Obvious disclaimer that I’m not American (I’m brazilian), so I really don’t understand the US political world and structure so well, although I have some prior vague knowledge of the Electoral College and yadda yadda.
So, I’ve recently stumbled upon some articles saying that Former U.S President Donald Trump tried a coup d’etat following his 2020 electoral defeat. I saw the Jan. 6th Capitol Riot live on that day, and I thought that that riot could be considered as a coup attempt alone. However, some days ago I started noticing that many articles started talking about “fake electors” and how Trump used them allegedly to subvert his defeat. I don’t know exactly how the Electoral College really works, so I would like to know what exactly Trump did and what really “fake electors” mean in this context.
An example of article talking about fake electors: https://www.msnbc.com/american-voices/watch/-this-was-a-coup-d-etat-trump-planned-to-seize-power-using-military-fake-electors-131479621786
Towelliee, Taliestin & Evitel, Michelle Morrow & some other community figures have been stating on Twitter that Alex Afrasiabi had a personal vendetta against someone/something which made him ruin Sylvanas' story before he left the team.
Bellular: https://twitter.com/BellularGaming/status/1485090254017253379?s=20
Taliesin & Evitel: https://twitter.com/TaliesinEvitel/status/1485233446968598534?s=20
Towelliee: https://twitter.com/towelthetank/status/1485234713237327873
Redshirtguy: https://twitter.com/TheRedShirtGuy/status/1483964045787078660
Michelle Morrow: https://twitter.com/meg_emmy_james/status/1484214178235695105
Edit:
I found another tweet by Taliesin & Evitel saying the same: https://twitter.com/TaliesinEvitel/status/1484090094860607488
In a new interview with Dave from the Generation Zed podcast, Ross Coulthart brings up USAF nuclear technician Adrian Reister’s experience with the orbs and “shadow person” that somehow managed to enter the highly guarded Whiteman Air Force Base where he was stationed between 2003-2007.
>It’s worldwide. These are people that are basically saying anomalous phenomena, or even in some cases as Adrian Reister has kindly referred to in this morning’s story in the Liberation Times - Sun newspaper story, shadow people. Shadow people.
>Interestingly enough, I know immediately the debunkers roll their eyes and go “This is crazy shit. This is all tinfoil hat nonsense.” But we’re in an era now where people like Sir John Pendry, the developer of the notion of metamaterials, are talking about workable invisibility cloaks. We’re talking about technology that might allow individuals or craft to be made fully invisible.
>So why is it not a major national security issue? As we speak, a major story has gone out in a tabloid newspaper in the UK and an excellent webzine, the Liberation Times that I recommend to everybody, that isn’t being broken in the New York Times, the Washington Post, the LA Times, all of the world’s premiere newspapers.
>This is big. This is a guy on the record. Shadow people, presumably somebody who was partially invisible, in one of the most secure facilities in the United States. Now look, I just — devil’s advocate for a moment — why is that not a major story? I mean you tell me. I don’t get it, I really don’t get it. I don’t understand why there is this cognitive dissonance.
Dave screenshares this Lockheed Martin article titled “How The Fantasy Of Invisibility Becomes Reality In The Sky.”
Ross continues.
>I mean, how do we know? I know this is an issue of concern inside the Pentagon. I know because I’ve spoken to senior officials who have confirmed to me they’ve seen these sightings reports, they aware of these sightings reports. George Knapp, my superb, well-ahead colleague George Knapp who presents on his superb website and also on Coast to Coast, his findings. He’s reported on sha
... keep reading on reddit ➡Never forget the 2015 Daily Mail article:
An investment firm billionaire claims his wife wanted a clause in their prenuptial agreement allowing her to move their three children to New York or San Francisco after a divorce because she found Chicago 'unsophisticated'.
During divorce proceedings in Cook County Court in Illinois, it was revealed that Anne Dias, 44, claims Ken Griffin, 45, was so upset by their pre-nup argument that he removed a post from their bed and threw it at her.
Yesterday Griffin, the founder and chief executive of $20billion Chicago hedge fund Citadel, denied throwing the bedpost during the 2003 argument after he 'inadvertently' removed it,
The argument about the Chicago clause happened days before the couple's lavish marriage ceremony in Versailles, France, the Chicago Tribune reported.
Griffin said in his filing: 'Anne surfaced with a demand that the premarital agreement contain a provision permitting her, in the event of divorce, to take any children from Chicago and move them to either San Francisco or New York.
'She claimed she wanted this because she did not want to continue living in Chicago, which she considered to be unsophisticated.'
After Griffin balked at the demand, an argument ensued.
