I've been struggling with a problematic trustee of a trust fund in my name for several years. It (and my personal financial situation) finally got to the point where I hired my own attorney! Yay!
My attorney reached out to the trustee in the first week of March making a request from the trust, and investigating if the trustee is still interested in doing his job. For context, he has likely been making discriminatory judgments based on his personal politics which do not align with mine, and he has a direct conflict of interest with the trust (his children benefit if I receive less money), and he has been denying requests that my attorney has explained are more than reasonable. For example, when I was temporarily homeless, he made it extremely difficult for me to use the money to find housing, and demanded I include him in my therapy recovery process.
Two weeks later, the trustee texted my brother in law (stupid, irrelevant, shot down) about the situation -- which we, and my attorney, thought was funny. He was investigating something that seemed/was illegal, which he then rescinded. On April 4th, my attorney said the trustee called her saying she would be hearing from his attorney shortly. On April 16th, the trustee's attorney called my attorney saying she would be receiving his response shortly. It's now April 24th, and we still have not heard their response.
I trust (pun unintended) my attorney, but I'm just curious what this actually means. Does it look bad on him from a legal standpoint, if this were to get beyond the point of casual conversational litigation and go to court to remove him as trustee? Is this as sketchy as it feels like it is, to be waiting two months to hear back? This guy is notoriously slimy, and as impatient as I am, I'm also just not sure what to make of this situation.
Location: WI, USA
But I know I can trust molecules, we have chemistry.
Palpatine voice Ionic...
They make up everything.
I was proud.
All they say is proper gander. Goose news!
I decided I had enough of a few people trying to claim that "In God We Trust" was always on our money.
https://imgur.com/gallery/DD9VVeU
I'm guessing they will probably try to say it's fake when I show it to them.
The truth is that I get a lot of restitution. As a kid, I was molested by this guy and he took a lot of videos and pictures. He traded with some other guy who ended up getting caught when he started sharing with more and more people. My abuser was caught afterwards.
Because of the "nature" of the videos and pics, I'm like this most "popular" child porn victim" (for boys) so almost every time they arrest someone for CP and they like boys, they always have stuff of me. All over the world. The guys in the US end up having to pay a fine and I get a portion of that in the form of restitution. I get letters from the DOJ and from other states notifying me that someone was convicted of something and I am eligible for restitution. I fill out a form and get a check. I get these notices every week. Last year, I got close to 70K in restitution.
YouTube is a business. Think of all the financial gurus on there that tell you a bunch of crap and only a few of them are honest about YouTube being their main source of income.
These new channels rising up over GME and others stocks are in it for building up an audience quickly and to get more views. You should not put your faith and trust in them nor watch what they do during the MOASS. They also can be bought. This is what Cramer's career on Television is. This is what they do.
Edit: Obviously not everyone on YouTube is this way. I'm just saying be careful and don't trust blindly just because someone says things you want to hear.
Edit2:. Oh shit Warden Elite.... Lmao just got his AdSense and that's all he was wanting
Never trust hairdressers. They are always talking behind your back!
-
I don't know them.
-
I know them.
Good Morning Everyone,
a supposed 13-F filing from Fidelity was posted today:
So after i saw that no link was provided, i checked it for myself. This filing doesn't exist (at the time i was writing this post).
So i inspected the screenshot and compared it to Fidelity's last filing in February.
(https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/315066/000031506621000776/xslForm13F_X01/20210216_FMRLLC.xml)
This is the filing from February 16th 2021.
This is the supposed filing from May 14th.
If you look closely you can see that no position changed but for Gamestop, which is odd. Because if you look at Fidelitys prior filing from November 2020, you can clearly see that Fidelity is buying/selling shares from different companies.
(https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/315066/000031506620001924/xslForm13F_X01/20201116_FMRLLC.xml)
I wouldn't trust every post on here, especially those which doesn't provide a form of source to look up.
These kind of Screenshots can be easily manipulated :
Changing the number of shares in Chrome.
🚀
Because they are always up to something
They are always up to something.
They’re always up to something
They make up everything.
