A list of puns related to "Hecataeus Of Miletus"
I'm trying to learn as much as possible about Thales of Miletus, and the society of Miletus in general during the time of Thales and the Lydian Croessus/Cyrus conflict. I'm really struggling to find sources - any suggestion of where to start in order to learn more?
Solid, liquid and gas
Decided to call it Lay Techs.
It Taurus apart
No one told me life was gonna be this way.
Listen you retards. I will explain the logic of why GME needs AMC and AMC needs GME.
GME feels like a late ship for many. GME is not attractive to many people out there at this levels, just the commited ones. AMC is the second most shorted stock here with big hedge funds on the other side. Chartwise, they moved the same.
For GME to rocket, it needs AMC hype. People will want to get in at 15$/share now that the company is not bankrupt anymore and feels like a realistic fair valued company which was kept to the ground with shorts.
GME needs to hold it's own a bit until AMC loads up on people.
GME is WSB short squeeze. AMC is the rest of dumb retail short squeeze.
They both need the fomo and hype of each other to pull this through.
AMC might have even more support if you think about Hollywood and stuff like that and that it might get boomers interested in saving their memories from AMC.
TLDR:. AMC NEEDS GME, GME NEEDS AMC.
BB, NOK are not short squeezes . End of story
Edit: if AMC was a diversion, they would have not limited the share at 1 as well. They are both fucking the shorts now that's why they limited both of them.
Edit: DONT FUCKING PULL OUT OF GME FOR AMC, WE NEED TO GET AMC GOING TO GET GME GOING, THATS WHAT I SAY
44.3m shares shorted last time was disclosed.
37% tutes ownership
That leaves around 60m float on market
44 out of 60 is over 70% short.
If they doubled down last week, we will see big moves coming
AMC HAS A STRONG BUY RATING,PT 23$, SO THIS IS BOTTOM
When they grow up, two of them becomes adult knees
Here is a quote from a Benzinga article released Friday, "PLTR shares are trading higher on above-average volume amid continued volatility in the name stemming from increased popularity amongst traders on Reddit's Wall Street Bets community."
This is one of the most concise points made in an article I've read in a while, and they simply don't list any of the other catalysts for the stock. No mention of Cathie Woods accumulating shares, no mention of demo day on the horizon. No mention of the float structure and Mithril potentially buying the locked up shares.
Seriously, who writes this stuff? It's almost like the chief editors of every financial publication agency are telling people to only write about WSB. This is really weird and it gives me the heebie jeebies. How can someone claiming to be a professional financial publication simply omits so many key facts about PLTR? Stuff seems borderline criminal. Anyone reading their article to get investment advice or info on PLTR got literally nothing. All they get is go check out r/wallstreetbets. Who the fuck is paying these writers?
Because they got in a fight once and 21
In case I got a hole in one
We went out and had beers. Cool guy, very driven, wants to be a web designer.
Saturday and Sunday...the rest are weekdays.