Predications Puns

honestly don’t want anymore content we already have so many arena, 2v2, raids, lab and etc.. MORE 2A units. maybe grinds for crit rate/damage, accuracy and resistances being added? new runes sets? (obvi added into giants,nerco or dragons) 4* devilmons.. ? should’ve already been in the game tho lmao. increased lightning for ld(slightly maybe by 1-2% more since most ld4 are hoh at this point) tbh idk it’s com2us they might just add increased rate of rune upgrade by 1% and call it an update but what y’all think might be added?

1. Avatar: The Way of the Water
   • $2 Billion
2. Jurassic World: Dominion
   • $1.8 Billon
3. Black Panther: Wakanda Forever
   • $1.3 Billion
4. Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness
   • $1.15 Billion
5. Water Gate Bridge (水门桥)
   • $1.1 Billion
6. Minion: The Rise of Gru
   • $1 Billion
7. Thor: Love and Thunder
   • $950 Million
8. The Batman
   • $880 Million
9. Lightyear
   • $800 Million
10. Mission: Impossible 7
    • $750 Million

These number might be high but we’ve seen how No Way Home preformed and I think these movies could preform extremely well. I didn’t include Aquaman 2 because I think it’ll be moved to 2023. What is your thoughts on my predication and what is your predications?

I’m curious what people think NVAX share price will be after FDA approval and Q4 revenues are reported. I’m hoping for $330 again but feel like NVAX should be valued closer to $400-$450. Last year I thought we could have easily hit $500-$700 but was a little too ambitious. Maybe in the future with other vaccines approved. Disclosure I’m long and waiting for future dividends. Good luck everyone!

Just rewatched episodes 1-8 and there is so much you catch the 2nd time around. Here are some thoughts/observations.

Blackmailer: It 100% HAS TO BE JEFF. Shortly in to episode 1, when Jeff is leaving Jackies house, he runs off in a goofy way while “you walk through clouds of glitter” plays on Shauna’s car radio. The person who received the duffle-bag is a male and runs in a similar goofy way.

Jeff: I don’t think he’s cheating. I also don’t think he’s acting alone as the blackmailer. But why? And who? Obvious money troubles ($60 Uber ride) and inventory issues (sketchy). But who? I think he’s using the $50K and Shauna’s journals for a book deal. Blonde at the hotel is writer/publisher.

Adam: Is he Javi? Love the theory. But there has to be a reason Shauna doesn’t recognize him or even have a hunch that it could be someone she should be a little more cautious about. If Javi is alive, why isn’t he mentioned or brought up at all, especially when Travis “dies” and his bank account is emptied. Wouldn’t he be Misty and Nat’s first thought if he was alive? I think Adam is a hired hand or co-conspirator with Jeff. He’s in the same location as Jeff on multiple occasions. Showing up at Shauna’s the night of the ransom exchange feels like a cover/distraction for Jeff.. who shows up the next morning and immediately showers. Ultimately, I think he gets killed somehow. Too pretty of an actor to keep on the payroll next season (even if he turns out to be Javi).

Travis: He obviously didn’t kill himself. I’m not even sure he’s actually dead. There was a weird scene at his house where the camera pans to Misty putting his check stub into her pocket. Misty SAYS he works at the Willowbrook Ranch, but Nat never verifies that. They just go. The whole suicide scene looks staged. Misty obviously knows and is in on that. Also, why would police be coming for a suicide? Who called?

Kevyn: He’s a “detective”. He is randomly at the bar Misty and Nat are at the night they go through Misty’s clues. Ep. 4 Misty somehow knows him and Nat are meeting at that restaurant for dinner. Ultimately, I think he’s working with/for Misty.

Misty: Known sociopath. I think she is pulling all the strings (wires?) behind the scenes both in 1996 and 2021. There is a scene where she almost eats a poisonous mushroom and then later uses that on Ben. I think she slowly poisons the group into madness. I think she is continuing to poison or even kill people (and possibly feed them to the elders) in 2021. T

so i have worked in mental health for many years and i an constantly thinking about behavioral health to a fault. that being said,

re: sam and her visual hallucinations

i went into this thinking way too hard apparently. my prediction was more of it being a shutter island-type film where sam had a stress-induced/predisposed psychotic break after finding out about her biological father, using drugs heavily, etc. i assumed that her "leaving town at 18 and not being in contact" was an allusion to being hospitalized. i also suspected that her relationship with richie was part of her delusion, and richie was actually a counselor or a care team staff member because he constantly advocated for her, checked in on her mental wellbeing, was aware of her mental health challenges without it being discussed on screen, and seemed to have nothing better to do than just leave his job and spend x amount of days in this jarring experience.

that being said, i called sam and tara's mom being ghostface, in sam's alternate reality (being explored in the movie) where her mom "kills" or revalues the parts of sam's past that she doesn't want to be associated with after learning who she truly is, or parts she feels she can't have. also we never see her mom, who is conveniently away - perhaps compartmentalized. her mom is one of the largest pieces of trauma in her trauma story, interpersonally abandoning her and emotionally neglecting her/shame and blame for the broken family. it would make sense for her mom to take a "leading role" in her disorganized thoughts.

continuing down my confirmation bias journey, my alternate ending (lol) was sam herself actually being ghostface, killing and attacking components of her own life. finally, my dramatic ass connected her notable affirmation of knowing who gale was specifically to maybe sam writing all of this while inpatient in a psychiatric facility, perhaps also dissatisfied with the previous movie and wanting to write a more appropriate ending that was cathartic to her healing. she found out about her father via journals, which says her mom enjoyed thorough journaling - writing could be an inherited trait. also gale wrote the book - so i made an ass out of you and me yet again (!!) and assumed perhaps she knew gale by being a reader.

the wheels started falling off the wagon once richie, tara and sam left the hospital together. i changed my prediction once it became obvious that the killer(s) were toxic reddit gatekeepers around the p

I don't know about you guys, but this season was a lot of fun. I know, we only won 3 games (and tied another) but I saw growth and potential. No, I am not sipping any Kool-Aid and I will not be fully sold until we play in a playoff game, but I can't help but feel like we are trending in a positive direction.

To me, it starts with Dan Campbell. He is transparent, he's not stubborn/stuck in his ways, and his players play very hard. Another positive I have noticed is player progression, which is a good indicator of a coaching staff.

Not only am I happy with HCDC so far, but the same can be said about Brad Holmes. I like what he has done so far. I feel like the moves he makes make sense given where we are as a franchise. I also like his drafting philosophy and was pretty satisfied with what we wound up with in the 21 draft. Penei Sewell and Amon Ra St. Brown alone makes for a solid haul. Those are two young corner stone pieces at crucial positions. Aside from them Barnes, Alim McNeill, and Milifonwu have all shown flashes as well.

With all of that said here is my offensive position breakdown. I will be including some predictions about FA and the draft. I am not going to get too-too deep into the depth chart because that'll take a week. I am going to mostly stick with starters and potential active rotational players.

QB:

• Jared Goff

The fact that we likely got 2 first round picks in the Stafford trade because we were willing to take on Goff's contract makes the trade that much sweeter. We needed an experienced bridge QB to lead us into a full rebuild and Stafford wanted to move on. I am not totally sold on Goff being the guy who leads us on playoff runs for years to come, but right now he's playing well and I see no need to force it and draft a project QB. If we win 2 games again next season and Goff struggles, then the conversation will be different, but I'd like to see Goff back next year.

RB:

• De'Andre Swift, Jamal Williams, Craig Reynolds

I like what we have at RB and I like what each guy brings. Swift is a playmaker and can be used in the passing game. He's the type of weapon we need and I am happy he's a Lion.

Jamal Williams, in my opinion, is his perfect complement. He is a good blocker in pass-pro, he has never fumbled, and he is very strong and physical and I think he is a good guy to have for those 4th-and-inches and goal line situations.

Lastly, Craig Reynolds has some potential. I feel totally comfortable with having h

Cryptocompare reports the closing price of LTO/USDT at 0.3241

Check the closing price for the 15th via the cryptocompare API: https://min-api.cryptocompare.com/data/pricehistorical?fsym=LTO&tsyms=USDT&ts=1639596646

Congratulations to the winner! /u/Relevant_Presence707 (now maybe use that reddit account a little bit more actively and start spreading the LTO gospel 😉😅)

https://preview.redd.it/243cy5bq92681.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9caa179c67b394a576f99d53686d7a2a90c2b542

Keep an eye on our social channels for more community activities.

Anyone think she's going to be an important character in S3 and later? Like I'm just wondering.

This is not a post about mods, this also not a post about "the good ole days", this is a post about the direction where this sub will head toward in the coming days.

As the number of members grows, the active number of members at any given time is about 400. That is a lot of active users in a group in Nepal. We have also started getting some mainstream attraction with some politicians, media personalities, entrepreneurs and some thought leaders posting in this sub.

Some time soon, this sub will explode into mainstream media and mainstream Nepali youths. Not old people, but youths will increase participation here. Especially, folks 15-25 will be more active on this sub. The mods are going to be active and there are going to be some issues with paid partnerships, some power tripping and ultimately fringe groups being formed. All in all, this place will become RONB or Entrepreneurs for Nepal or some other bullshit clout chasing platform. I will tell you this, even then, I would rather upvote a shitpost than a mainstream post. But its getting harder to figure out which is which.

I hate those mainstream clout chasing groups and online forums. Mods are power-trippers in those platforms because they are chasing clout. At least, here you get to be anonymous, even that is going to be some sort of status symbol for those clout chasers. I really don't know, why they chase clout. Does it make them feel better about themselves? Is it a pride thing? I don't understand it and I loathe these phony ass clout chasers powertripping on everyone's business.

My heart breaks for pretzel

I think Jess will come to realize the jeopardy she put murphy in by killing Nina when everyone gets a call that Murphy gets jumped by Sam in the cell I see it happening and will come clean next season

Max will go back to Murphy because Leslie sucks asshole

White:

Drogskol Infantry: 2/2, 2-drop with card advantage in the late-game. I think this will be a solid card in any white decks, and especially good when put on flyer of lifelinker

Traveling Minister: Helps activate training cards, triggers gaining life matters synergy, allows smaller creatures to attack up, gives you a couple points of life

Gryff Rider: Almost a wind drake that can threaten to grow. I don't think there will be many 1/1 spirits lying around to threaten to block this, and even if there are, it can grow to 3/2 and attack through

Blue:

Lantern bearer: A 1/1 flyer is a relevant threat in the early game . And the backside is arcane flight for 3, which isn't a horrible rate.

Binding geist: This is going to be able to attack through any 2 attack creatures, and it gives you another spell when it dies.

Cruel witness: 3/3 flyer is a decent rate, and when you get to surveil everytime you cast a noncreature spell, it puts it over the edge

Black:

Doom dissenter: This will be the premium 2 drop as it gives you a 1/1 creature to sac with a 2/2 creature put onto the battlefield immediately, so you don't lose tempo

Desperate farmer: 2/2 lifelink is a pretty bad rate, but the threat of activation to a 4/3 lifelink will be very difficult to race/swing into. I also think for UB decks that might be a little bit more controlling, this extra life will be extremely valuable

Courier bat: 2/2 wind drake at it's worse, but has upside to draw you a card. I think there will be any incidental life gain triggers and life link creatures around to make this a good card.

Green:

Spore Crawler: if green is good in this set, this will be the best common of the set. It replaces it's (although not immediately), and has a decent sized body (compared to generous stray from GNR)

Dawnhart disciple: Can attack as a 3/3 and can help trigger training on other creatures, which is exactly what W/G want to do.

Wolf strike: Bite spell that let's your small creatures punch through higher toughness creatures. I think this should be used as soon as your opponents are tapped out to take any good trades

Red:

Abrade: Cheap, efficient removal spell, not much more to add.

Flame blessed bolt: Also cheap, efficient removal spell. The exile clause is nice against disturb creatures that can usually get 2 for 1, but not against this card.

Lacerate flesh: I think you are the most happy when this can kill a 3 mana 3/

Since we now know who makes Clayton’s F4, who do you predict will be F1, F2, F3 and F4?

I have purchased all the volumes and have recently started my journey and am loving it so far. I don't typically read a huge amount of romance centered stories. I like romance based stuff, but I primarily read fantasy light novels, so the romance is more of a side thing. I think the author is a genius for not making it known who the guy is going to end up with as usually one is able to tell. With that being the case, the information I have has lead to predict the following

Order of who I think is most likely to end up with Fuutarou:

1. My best guess is whichever one of the siblings is the one who was in the picture with him as a child. It seems that girl changed him and he would have the best connection with her. (Assuming it actually was one of them in the picture). Without knowing who is the other half in that picture is, my guesses would be:
2. Itsuki: With what I have seen so far, I think Itsuki is the most likely. Itsuki shares a class with Fuutarou which is a huge help. Plus, she knows already about his situation and the debt. In addition, she has agreed to eat over at his house and Rahia seems to really like her. They may not get along currently, but they have so many connections (could be a trap by the author though)
3. Yotsuba: The reason why I think Yotsuba is the most likely after Itsuki is her outgoing nature and positivity. She is so nice and is someone that is just a joy to be around. Fuutarou also seems to get along with her pretty easily. Also, the time she had with Raiha was very productive for her chances imo. A way to that man's heart is through his sister.
4. Ichika: I rate Ichika 3rd as I think she would be the most likely to actually try and make a move and actually ask Fuutarou out.
5. Miku: He did win her trust with the whole Warlord saga and the piggyback ride and ankle tapping were sweet and wholesome, but it is hard for me to determine how much they have in common. Plus, Miku seems pretty laid back and with Fuutarou's personality it is a bit harder for me to see
6. Nino: The drugging of him sure didn't help her matters, but I am basing this primarily on her not recognizing the picture. (RIP)

Order in my heart (for now):

1. Yotsuba: I just think she is so sweet. This is the one I am currently rooting for
2. Itsuki: I really like Itsuki too. I get her reactions with the way they first met. Plus, I think she is just the right amount of tsun
3. Miku: They have some sweet moments together. She would also be fun to hang with if y

According to Wikipedia,

>Gilles Deleuze maintained that predication is not attribution since substance is not a subject of attribute.[17] In his description of the schema of attribution, Deleuze maintained that the predicate is above all relation and event, not attribute.[18] He drew from Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz' conceptualization of the event, which holds that "the predicate is a verb, and that the verb is irreducible to the copula and to the attribute."[17] The thinker posited that "the world itself is an event and, as an incorporeal (=virtual) predicate, the world must be included in every subject."[19] He maintained that everything has a reason, examining causality by identifying an event that which happens to a thing with or without cause or reason.[20]

I can't make heads nor tails of this. I'm guessing this means that Deleuze is a monist, and that that substance can't have attributes means to Deleuze that anything that is reducible to that substance also can't have attributes? Does Deleuze then suppose there are things which are NOT reducible to substance? Otherwise, why does he make predication distinct from attribution, rather than saying that attribution NEVER does what we think it does? And what's the relation between predication and substance that is created by predication, as opposed to making the substance the subject of an attribute, as would occur in attribution if it was possible? And aren't predicates always incorporeal (which makes them predicates, as opposed to bearers of predicates)? So how is the "world" in any sense more incorporeal than any other predicate (let alone how it is incorporeal, or an event, in the first place)?

What would be a comprehensive reformulation of his thesis, or where could I find such?

Hi All,

One winner will be announced next month on Oct. 7th for the Nobel Prize in Literature. I'd like to hear everyone's predictions and, alternatively, who do you think deserves the prize (assuming the answer to the latter is different than the former)?

** As a preface because I have the sense that certain individuals will complain about extra-literary factors (i.e. each author's ideology, race, gender, and geography) being taken into consideration. This is NOT an endorsement nor a condemnation of that fact - it's merely an acknowledgement of the Nobel Committee's thought-process.

With that said, last year's winner was Louise Gluck -- a female poet from North America. Make of that what you will. My thoughts below:

The Impact of Gluck's Selection

• With Gluck's inclusion, I think it's safe to say that we likely won't be seeing a winner from the United States this year (sorry, Pynchon/McCarthy);
• Broadening the point above, a North American selection is out, so no Anne Carson nor Atwood (thank goodness for the latter);
• It's highly unlikely a poet will be selected -- the last time back-to-back poets had been in contention was 1995. Unfortunately, that means Adonis is once again tragically passed over...; and
• The Nobel has never had back-to-back women win the prize. Certainly not impossible, but I do think this tilts us in favor of a male winner.

The Nobel Library

The authors and novels checked out in the Nobel library has historically been the best predictor of success. The more novels checked out, the more likely the winner. A huge shout to WordLiteratureForum member Salixcaena for posting it there. Here it is below.

1. Homero Aridjis (Mexican Poet) - 6 books
2. Can Xue (Chinese Novelist) - 6 books
3. Anne Carson (Canadian Poet) - 4 books
4. Mia Couto (Mozambican Novelist) - 11 books
5. Helene Cixous (French Philosopher) - 3 books
6. Inger Edelfeldt (Swedish Children’s Author) - 3 books
7. Annie Ernaux (French Novelist) - 18 books
8. Jon Fosse (Norwegian Novelist/Dramatist) - 11 books
9. David Grossman (Israeli Novelist) - 3 books
10. Anna Hallberg (Swedish Poet) - 5 books
11. Ann Jäderlund (Swedish Poet) - 3 books
12. Karl One Knausgard (Norwegian Writer) - 5 books
13. Michel Houellebecq (French Novelist) - 8 books
14. Peter Nadas (Hungarian Novelist) - 4 books
15. Malte Persson (Swedish Novelist) - 3 Books
16. Jila Mossaed (Swedish Academy Member) - 3 books
17. Marilynne Robinson (American Author) - 3 books
18. Steve Sem-S

GULC: when do you guys think we will hear? Did anyone group interview recently and hear back? I haven't heard of any acceptances this week so I'm nervous!

We need mama Cruikshank on the pod ASAP!! I need to hear her pop culture predictions for 2022. I think she did this years ago but she’s always on point 💁🏽‍♀️🔮

First time posted, long time Wow player ( Private server sadly :x)

Been doing lot of World of Warcraft logos for 3 years now, mostly using the BFA base logo and make ideas with it , though why not to share one of the recent ones I did ( First ones I did quite bad)

With the status of SL being more or less a miss, there are few things floating on hinting the next expansion. On the shop with The Dragon Pack , might hint with on a dragon expansion, so I decided to do a logo for a dragon themed expansion ( Dragon Isles).

The Idea is mostly that Dragons were part of the Horde back in Warcraft 2, why not some deciding to join the Alliance side to make it even, and to help Wrathion uncover the true secrets of the Dragon Isles

https://preview.redd.it/d3iqntv106781.png?width=4500&format=png&auto=webp&s=bb17eec13f2dd88e498e7d081f2fc94d91daeb1e

https://imgur.com/JaNu420

If You want to see the old ideas I did back then, let me know to post a link to an album where I posted older logos and an old version of the logo I did back then ( Quite bad )

Just curious, what do you believe the outcome will be for this upcoming ER and 10-Q filing?

Good or bad — both need to be considered

Hi,

I'm not quite through The God is Not Willing, however, I really wanted to voice some thoughts in case I forget them before I am done with the book.

First observation: although I still have a few dozen pages left, I think Elade Tharos is faking it. He is not interested in saving anyone's life. For example, before the first engagement with the Malazans, a scout was informing him about the unusual formation being employed by the Malazans. It seemed like Elade seemed uninterested, all he wanted to do was charge into battle and couldn't care less about the outcome. Also, later, he met with Spindle and Oams in which Spindle sanctioned their migration into the south so long as they didn't raid. However, the way Elade was overly emotional, albeit warranted, seemed uncharacteristic for someone his position. He was overly emotional (once again warranted) and easily gave in to the promises. What I mean is, it seems to me he is pulling off a lot of theatrics (which reminds me of Hannan Mosag in some ways). Oh! Let's not mention Spindle and Oams being jumped in the woods, although perhaps that was actually ill fortune considering Balk ordered them away and Balk does seem genuinely interested in the well-being of his mercs and stays true to his word. Still thinking that one through tbh.

Second observation: Elade is really opposed to Rant because he is the son of Karsa which he voices over and over again in their initial meeting. I wonder if his real ambition is to kill Karsa considering their destination is to drive south until they are at the walls of Darujhistan. If so, I have no clue how the hell he would pull that off but perhaps given his wreckless behavior, he is just suicidal. I think the scouts during the first engagement might have figured that out because they were observed to be suddenly scared after seeing his response in regards to the Malazan formation.

Final Observation (for now): Rant reminds me a lot of Onos T'oolan. He was able to break off from the Teblor tribe much like T'oolan was able to avoid the ritual of Tellann. Rant was faced with a choice, either commit to his tribe against their fruitless war against the "Children" or choose his own path in discovering the fate of his mother. I thought Veloc expressed the sentiment well and that he was freed from slavery only to be bound by chains of vegengence which dragged him into a field of slaughter. I am probably fucking this up and invite scrutiny.

Oh, Final Final Observation. Bengar and

I'm a 40k player that is in constant envy of the models that AoS gets with its new releases. I've been toying with the idea of getting into the game but depending on the faction I get very turned off by their aging battleline. I would love to get into the game with a compelling new battleline.

1. With the new edition, what factions are rumored for a refresh?

2. Are there any Dark Mechanicum/ World Eaters/ Emperor's Children- equivalents in AoS? i.e. Factions/ sub-factions in the lore without their own battletome?

Bonus Question: Are the older Skaven, Seraphon, Beastmen, etc WHFB models ranges just painted in an older style in the official art, or are they actually not great models?

wh