It’s not what it sounds like.
It’s not what it sounds like.
Let me start off by saying that we live in the US. The reason why I'm mentioning that will make more sense. Because it might not be applicable to other countries. I had some recent hospital tests done for kidney stones (no fun). While visiting my parents I was talking about all the tests they had to do, and my mother said something about a test she had to do in the past.
"I didn't even talk to them but to interpret the scan they sent me a $30 bill"
My dad, "I don't think they've ever made a $30 bill"
The bartender gives them both water because he is able to distinguish the boundary tones that dictate the grammatical function of homonyms in coda position, as well as pragmatic context.
They're just like cinnamon rolls. Only spelled different.
Is it an Ad Homonym attack?
I think that's called an ad homonym attack.
Just like my dear old Grammar used to make...
You are committing the logical fallacy of argument ad homonym.
"I'll have H2O," says the 1st. "I'll have H2O, too," says the 2nd. The bartender gives them both water because he is able to distinguish the boundary tones that dictate the grammatical function of homonyms in coda position, as well as pragmatic context.
