I know that the earth is a giant electro magnet , and the magnetic field helps protect us from radiation from space among other things, but doesn't it also give off Electromagnetic Radiation? I would think that with all that's going on in the core that at least some Electromagnetic Radiation would be emitted, right? I tried looking this up, but the search terms confuse Google.
When an atom have some kinetic energy how that energy transform inform of electromagnetic radiation, do the protons constantly radiate?, but many people say that electron won't radiate with some certain energy but if the energy is quantized it does radiate, Since changing in magnetic field changes the magnetic field oscillating back and forth, Why electrons don't radiate with every energy that atom has since the atom is moving.
Edit: THANK YOU ALL FOR THE AMAZING RESPONSES!
I didnβt expect this to blow up this much! I guess some other people had a similar question in their head always!
A TL;DR version is basically the title. Also, there's an extra "be more harmful" in the title, but I can't find an option to fix it.
Now onto the original post:
For example, visible light (a light bulb) is "above" radio waves and microwaves (5G) in the electromagnetic spectrum, meaning it has a shorter wavelength and higher energy and frequency. A TV remote uses infrared radiation which is also "above" radio waves and microwaves. Obviously, a TV remote and a light bulb are completely harmless despite having higher energy and frequency than radio waves and microwaves. Now, here is what I'm wondering. Is there more to it than just the "position" in the electromagnetic spectrum when it comes to potential health risks to humans? I know that 5G is harmless, but is it necessarily less harmful than a light bulb just because it's "lower" in the electromagnetic spectrum or are there more factors that determine how harmful certain radiation is to humans? If there is more to it, what is it? What would make 5G more harmful than a light bulb, despite visible light being much "higher" in the electromagnetic spectrum than radio waves and microwaves, assuming that is the case? Government websites just state that there are currently no known health concerns related to 5G and that it is still being studied whether there could be any health concerns, but why would they say that if we know that light bulbs are harmless and they are "higher" in the electromagnetic spectrum? Is it just a formality?
I couldn't think of any better example than 5G, so please forgive me about that, I'm not a stupid conspiracy theorist and I'm all for better network, I am absolutely not worries about any kind of safety risks because there are not any, but I'm just curious about how radiation works.
They surround locations with electromagnetic radiation, it's used for lighting. You can see it subtly all around you and if you start to record it, they'll move the radiation focal point. They use EMF waves for brain and body imaging. Radio frequencies support V2K. My perps (who are deranged black men and women serving a few pedophilic and sociopathic white men) attempted to condition me to only admiring black men, they made every guy I dated abuse me psychologically. This business seems to be a lot of pervy old men doing pervy old shit. There's no depth to it besides them using it to spy on people physically, etc.
I've been looking at the history of virology and I've seen a few things about the first rabies vaccine. Attenuation (making the viruse weak enough to not be a threat) can be done via passaging them through unrelated animals cells, drying them, exposure to oxygen, and heat.
Question. I've heard that you can hit them with X-rays and uv radiation to deattenuate them, but how useful is the success rate? I've heard that the UV radiation simply denatures the proteins so badly that they're point less for usage in vaccination.
P.s. how do they ensure the proteins are still useful after heating? Do they just heat them 'just right'?
