I understand we use radio waves, microwaves, visible light and other radiation that falls on the electromagnetic spectrum. Beyond this what else can we use to detect / observe the happenings in space.
I understand that there is a whole lot of vacuum in space so we can't really use audio, but what other sensory information is / can be used.
Hello. English is not my native language so if something is not understandable just tell me.
I was thinking about the velocity and maneuvers of UAPs as described by its witnesses. It exceeds any known human technology in performance, so UAPs can't be human aircraft. However, what if UAPs are just projections of electromagnetic spectrum as light, infrared, etc.? We could generate images and signals that violate physics if they were real objects, like in a movie. But in real 3D space, not on a 2D screen. There could be a more plausible human technology explanation if this is the case. Please take a look at this 2018 video, then after it continue reading: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YRZMdQOMPNQ
Maybe someone developed lasers, holograms and other forms of emission (volumetric images) that can be used to generate these UAPs in the air. They could serve as decoys for military tactics, sensor jamming, etc. Maybe they even can make holograms not of just light, but of any frequency of wave (infrared, ultraviolet, microwave) to also mess with military sensors. Recently we had news about someone targeting USA personal with microwave to mess with their brains, so it could be the same perpetrator with similar technology, or maybe it is a well known technology already in the top-secret level among countries.
These volumetric images are probably delivered with help of stealth submarine drones, they could be nuclear-powered, very compact and silent, traveling slowing by the seabed, so sonar can't detect it. Maybe they act in conjunction with military satellites or even some kind of stealth sub-orbital drone, this could explain why these UAPs are detected from space to sea level, but not underwater (no sonar data as we know until now).
Would like to know what you guys think about this theory.
For those physics enthusiasts or students out there, check out this interesting, multi-purpose, graphical, educational, scientific, interactive, online, multimedia presentation! Learn, calculate and visualise everything around the electromagnetic spectrum.
https://preview.redd.it/3ulgau5uact61.png?width=778&format=png&auto=webp&s=16338eb7c6008cb30d7b20aba1e82410854d8e38
This is just a minor nitpick of Kyle's "Autism is my superpower" video.
I think this analogy is flawed and leads to some big misconceptions about autism. When people hear the word spectrum they think of a 1 dimentional spectrum, electromagnetic, audio etc but this doesn't capture the complexity of the autistic spectrum.
Autism isn't a 1 dimensional spectrum between "normal" and completely autistic. Using analogies which treat autism as 1 dimensional leads teachers, parents, bosses etc to think "Well Billy is only a little bit autistic so he shouldn't have any problems if we force him to do what everyone else is doing".
Autistic people can have very low levels of presentation in certain autistic traits but have profound difficulty in others. They could for example have learned to communicate effectively enough to appear neurotypical or even gifted but have extreme difficulties processing emotions, recognizing expressions and dealing with sensory input for example. Autism is a many dimensional spectrum, a much better representation IMO would be something like a radar chart.
Introduced: Sponsor: Rep. David βMadisonβ Cawthorn [R-NC11]
This bill was referred to the House Committee on Agriculture and House Committee on Energy and Commerce which will consider it before sending it to the House floor for consideration.
1 cosponsor is on those committees.
My faivorite colour is microwave btw Β―_(γ)_/Β―
My understanding of physics is not very good but wouldnβt it have been better to evolve to see with say radio waves instead of visible light since they travel much further and go through objects easier
Need some help! Iβm certified in bio, but took a long term sub position (probably permanent) where Iβm also teaching a very low-level general science for juniors and seniors (in addition to the bio classes). The teacher that I took over for left the school high and dry- didnβt leave any materials, he didnβt use a textbook, locked out his accounts and Google classrooms, etc., so I have no resources, and Iβm the only one teaching this course... the other teachers who cover physics/chemistry only teach AP/IB, teach from the book, and donβt have any online resources.
Weβve spent the past few weeks learning about waves, and I wanted to do something with the electromagnetic spectrum. The majority of my students are online-only, so any activities I do need to be virtual. The other big problem Iβm having is the whole Adobe flash issue... most simulations Iβm finding were flash-based, so they no longer work.
Hit me with your best EMS resources, videos, and simulations, because Iβve now spent 4 hours scouring the internet for ideas and have found very little. Thanks in advance!!
How can we navigate the finte electromagnetic spectrum problem?
I'm interested to understand how we can navigate the electromagnetic spectrum. I'm imagining a world where everyone has a phone and other devices in the future which require EM waves. What happens if we run out of frequencys?
If for example we did and we had to change to a different frequency would we need perhaps a larger aerial? or how would this change the designs of our devices currently?
Also do aerials work by allowing you to use larger aerials for low frequency waves on phones rather than UHF or SHF?
