SO is getting serious about getting engaged this year (reaching out to ring companies to design/size/talked with SS9,etc.) I want to do premarital counseling and have some discussions to make sure we’re on the same page. I’m wondering what conversations or agreements you had or wish you had around family,boundaries, etc. with SK and BM
I and my partner are about to get married and I was wondering about the prenup agreement. We're not rich but we want to be realistic and want to each of us to keep the assets, funds, savings, earnings, properties, debts acquired before and after marriage in the case of an unlikely separation.
If you could give me a rough estimate on timelines and price I'd really appreciate it.
And please recommend a good but inexpensive lawyer/firm.
Thanks.
The pressure of a fluid increases the deeper you go, and the pressure of a fluid acts in all directions. In fact, this idea is of great importance in discussing buoyancy.
If the pressure of the fluid acts in all directions*—even above—*shouldn't the higher-pressure, deeper parts of the ocean put pressure on the lower-pressure, higher parts of the ocean; thus, causing the pressure of the ocean to be uniform?
So there are bills currently in legislation that among other things, ban non-competition agreements and implement the Uniformed Trade Secrets Act in Massachusetts.I'd like to hear what you think because I'm a bit torn. I'm studying law and I like to hear other's opinions on matters. I have no more stake in this claim as any other employee residing in Massachusetts.
For those not educated in law, in laymen terms, the Acts (H. 4082 and H.4045), one of which is sponsored by Governor Deval Patrick, would ban companies from obstructing an employee's opportunity to look for work if they leave their current employer. In almost all companies currently, when you are first employed you sign an agreement that says "you will not be employed by any competitor of 'Current Employer' within X amount of months or X amount of miles in relation to HQ".
Furthermore, the current legislation protecting Massachusett's employers trade secrets' is the ability to punish individuals that knowingly leaked private information that was only known to a limited amount of people in the company. This protects, primarily small businesses from having employees go around telling competitors, in particular, about recipes, techniques, negotiation strategies, etc. So joining the other 48 states that currently implement the Uniformed Trade Secrets Act is something of an insurance policy from employees leaving companies and using unqiue information that was given to them from their past employer for the benefit of their employer and the demise of their past employer.
Governor Deval Patrick looks to create an environment that would increase competition in the workforce, and subsequently attract a more talented workpool. States like California limit the degree of which non-competition agreements are allowed, as would Massachusetts. California is constatnly referenced as a barometer for entrepreunership and job growth. However, the current legislation in Massachusetts may make it uniquely diverse in its ability to maintain job stability and "sorta" competitive company creation.
https://reddit.com/r/fundiesnark/comments/hw0lri
https://r.go1dfish.me/r/fundiesnark/comments/hw0lri/
S.1 The law decrees that photos of children in school uniforms must only be taken with said children stood before the front entrance of a dwelling with the aforementioned door in the closed position.
S.2(a). In the event that inclement weather prohibits the photographing to take place outside, one must substitute the front door for a location inside the dwelling.
S.2(b). The substituted location must be that of the door of the living room leading directly to the exit door at the front of the dwelling.
S.3 The penalties for breaking sections 1 and 2 of the act shall be no more than a snubbing from the other parents at the school gates and/or a series of tuts not exceeding the amount of three.
