A list of puns related to "Block (chess)"
First of all, *CLASSIC* Nothin short of it. Both KILLED IT. But two lines (to me) hit the hardest that battle let's be real.
CHESS: βEazy Come, Eazy Goβ (Round 1)
βLet's say it's me and bro, with heaters though
Waitin' for him to leave a show, he walk out *PAOW*, peta roll
I found him there, he dyin' there, 'fore he can run, Nina's blow
You can be here today and gone tomo-, where ever Eazy come, EAZY GO!β
EAZY THE BLOCK CAPTAIN: βDonβt Say Think About Itβ (Round 2)
βIf you threaten my life, then my thoughts is clouded
Disrespect me in public, then in public is where we talk about it
I will catch you on autopilot
Don't say "think about it", cause if Iβm at that point, I ALREADY THOUGHT ABOUT IT!β
Both had me shedding TEARS.
Who you got tho?
https://dood.la/e/l01j827jo9pkehmw81h7i9e22io4gq42
Writing down is needed to prove that the first player didn't change his mind after hearing the guess.
Craig Wright has cryptographically signed privately for many prominent people as Satoshi Nakamoto the creator of Bitcoin using the private key from Block 1 the very first mined Bitcoin block. But Craig has not yet signed publicly which has caused a lot of criticism from haters of him and his design for Bitcoin. More accurately they fear him and Bitcoin, and that fear manifests as hate.
If Craig had signed publicly as Satoshi, most of the haters would likely not have simply turned into supporters due to such an event. Instead they would've likely said that the key is not proof and was obtained some other way and they would push that narrative. By not signing Craig has forced the haters to commit to a different narrative of oh "he can't sign", pretending that it was some magician trick done on the brand new laptop that Gavin Andresen was convinced was not tampered with. The only way BSV-haters can commit to such a narrative is to also commit to the narrative of "signing is undeniable proof". Both narratives go hand-in-hand you can't really have one without the other without some serious mental gymnastics.
Its interesting to analyze the logic and game theoretics around this. Craig has refused to sign publicly for years now, leading to an accumulating effect where the haters continuously buy into and grow this narrative. By allowing this narrative to inflate by refusing to sign, it detracts away from the future narrative of "he stole the key" because they have already committed to the narrative that "signing is undeniable proof" as explained in the paragraph above. They have bought so hard into the "he can't sign" narrative that the "he stole the key or obtained it some other way" narrative will later look pretty silly. The haters will no longer be able to deny he is Satoshi without displaying a huge logical inconsistency which will make them look stupid to any outside observers.
Because their Queen never dies.
i think it might be useful
There's nothing worse than chess nuts boasting in an open foyer..
he starts on nights next week.
AITA for deleting my boyfriendβs Chess account?
My (23F) boyfriend (24M) is a massive chess buff. He will spend hours rambling about chess, days arguing on forums, and spend eternity on his online Chess account. Heβs spent around 10 years building up his account and loves to play. I on the other hand, can play, but am nothing compared to him.
However, he has recently been even more engrossed in his Chess addiction. Iβm talking all nighters spent on that goddamn site following dumb tournament streams and replaying other matches (why would you replay someone elseβs match btw?) Even more suspicious is the fact he is now using his phone for chess, something he previously swore to not do since according to him, βthe phone UI sucks.β
His phone now always keeps pinging with chess notifications, and the most suspicious part is that they are messages from someone on the site. The notifications donβt tell me who they are or what they are saying, just that βSomeone has sent you a message.β
The straw that broke the camelβs back was when he told me with 2 hrs notice that he would be leaving for a Chess tournament, but he told me at 5pm. Who holds a tournament at 7 in the night and stretches it to a night over? He told me it was a University event, and showed me an unrelated message that was apparently proof. He then got pissy when I told him he wasnβt to go because I was fed up with him treating me like a side table in his house. He told me that I canβt tell him what to do and then left early.
What I did after this was I did the βforgot your passwordβ option on his account, reset the password and logged into his account and deleted it.
An hour later my phone gets blown up with texts from him, which I say I will talk to you later, enjoy your βtournamentβ and blocked him.
AITA?
Update
So I posted this just before I went to bed. I hear sounds in the kitchen that wake me up and see my BF packing his things. We had a bit of fight but in the end, he admitted to using his Chess account to hookup with a girl from College. Even though he admitted, he is still furious about his account and how he was some really high 'FM' rank that is very hard to get. Judging by the comments, it seems like I went way to far by deleting his account, but it also seems like my suspicions were correct.
I just found out today that my Nervous System block director (Iβm in medical school) was also my first-round opponent in a 2018 tournament 100 miles away from our school. Anyone else have any examples of their chess world being pretty small?
Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.