A list of puns related to "John Templeton Jr."
Hi all, Greetings from London.
I am reposting this post of mine from months ago to lift some spirits today.
Sir John Templeton: In 1939, at the outbreak of WWII and conflict in Europe; the stock market sunk. Sir John Templeton seized the opportunity of the uncertainty & fear in the markets. He bought 100 shares of every stock selling less than a dollar. He held all the stocks (even the ones facing bankruptcy); and when life returned back to normal: he made 400% in four years!
Holding stocks that are declining feels very counter-intuitive, uncomfortable & depressing.
(1) Focus on the business value - and leave anxieties about news updates & headlines, future outlook and trends to other investors. The daily churn of gloomy/downcast media front page headlines can be overwhelming. But, Baba is buying back $15B in stock, spending billions of dollars buying businesses for years; expanding & reinvesting into their business. They got their huge $2B fine and a much smaller one recently. As someone mentioned on a different thread, Didi was a listing that should never have happened. China is bringing in regulations - they are not going to unwind their own tech empire and return to the halcyon days of farming.
(2) Think differently to the crowds - If you want superior returns and performance, you must think differently to the crowds. This is why following trends and reacting to speculative news items and commentary is futile. For that reason, I think technical analysis provides such a limiting bounded view. Instead, look to buying stocks below some concept of their intrinsic value. Ask yourself - objectively - whether the Chinese state really intends to divorce itself from international capitalism? And how much of that is hysterics - such as the education sector.
(3) Sunny weather tomorrow - In one year, the news and everyone will forget what's happening today and the stock will move up. In 2008, everyone was thinking that US is totally doomed and the world financial system was collapsing - but it very quickly recovered. It can sometimes seem like End-of-Days but life goes on and everything returns to normal. The Stock Market Crash 2020 must have seemed like the end-of-the-world.
John Templeton was among the greatest investors and investment managers of the 20th century. He passed away in 2008 at the age of 95. He became known for rather contrarian views, which included not following the crowd and buying after major market declines.
βIf you want to have a better performance than the crowd, you must do things differently from the crowd,β Templeton once stated. Since there are superior performers in the market, it means that there are plenty of underperformers at the same time. But unlike short-term trading, which is a zero-sum game (one gains at the expense of the other), when it comes to investing, many participants benefit from rising markets. Still, following the crowd brings mediocre results. At times, following the hype a crowd has bought can lead to financial ruin.
βFocus on value because most investors focus on outlooks and trendsβ is one of Templetonβs maxims. Watching trends can be profitable, especially for experienced traders and investors. Technical analysis, which includes looking at past trends, is one of the tools. However, if everyone follows the same rules (such as buying at support and selling at resistance), it becomes very had to make profits. Also, looking at trends can lead to speculative mania and buying at the top just before the downfall. On the other hand, looking to buy stocks and other assets below their intrinsic values can be a very profitable strategy for those who are patient and have skills at finding out what the value is. One of the ways of finding it is with fundamental analysis...
Excerpt from The Educated Investor's Handbook: What You Need to Know First
Found this list online (credit to https://monevator.com/). This list is similar (though more about stock picking) to the earlier post on John Bogle's 12 Pillars of Investing.
For all long-term investors, there is only one objective: βmaximum total real return after taxes.β
Achieving a good record takes much study and work, and is a lot harder than most people think.
It is impossible to produce a superior performance unless you do something different from the majority.
The time of maximum pessimism is the best time to buy, and the time of maximum optimism is the best time to sell.
To put βMaxim 4β in somewhat different terms, in the stock market the only way to get a bargain is to buy what most investors are selling.
To buy when others are despondently selling and to sell what others are greedily buying requires the greatest fortitude, even while offering the greatest reward.
Bear markets have always been temporary. Share prices turn upward from one to twelve months before the bottom of the business cycle.
If a particular industry or type of security becomes popular with investors, that popularity will always prove temporary and, when lost, wonβt return for many years.
In the long run, the stock market indexes fluctuate around the long-term upward trend of earnings per share.
In free-enterprise nations, the earnings on stock market indexes fluctuate around the book value of the shares of the index.
If you buy the same securities as other people, you will have the same results as other people.
The time to buy a stock is when the short-term owners have finished their selling, and the time to sell a stock is often when the short-term owners have finished their buying.
Share prices fluctuate more widely than values. Therefore, index funds will never produce the best total return performance.
Too many investors focus on βoutlookβ and βtrendβ. Therefore, more profit is made by focusing on value.
If you search worldwide, you will find more bargains and better bargains than by studying only one nation. Also, you gain the safety of diversification.
The fluctuation of share prices is roughly proportional to the square root of the price.
The time to sell an asset is when you have found a much better bargain to replace it.
When any method for selecting stocks becomes popular, then switch to unpopular
Most people are no doubt somewhat familiar with the Pew Research Center, which claims to be a βnonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the worldβ. Moreover, the Pew Research Center claims to be agnostic with respect to public policy, not taking a position on public policy at all. In this debate, I will argue that these claims by the Pew Research Center are misleading, that it is deeply rooted in Evangelical Christianity, and that its religious orientation biases not only its choice in what to research, but how it conducts its research, and what findings it hopes to elucidate.
But first, a history lesson (or two). The Pew Research Center began life as a legitimate research organization β the Times Mirror Center for the People & the Press β in 1990. The goal of the organization was to conduct opinion polls and to make their findings available to the press so they could report on how well (or how poorly) government policies aligned with the will of the people. While one might question how apolitical an opinion polling organization can really be when its primary funding source is a media organization, this isnβt the subject of the present debate. In 1996, and for reasons that are not entirely clear, the Times Mirror Center for the People & the Press came under new management by The Pew Charitable Trusts, which among other things, funds The Gospel and Our Culture Network (source). The Gospel and Our Culture Network describes itself as βa network to provide useful research regarding the encounter between the gospel and our culture, and to encourage local action for transformation in the life and witness of the churchβ (source). That Pew Charitable Trusts would provide funding for an overtly religious organization is consistent with the history of the organization. Joseph Newton Pew, who began the familyβs fortune after having founded the Sun Oil Company, was a member of the Presbyterian Church and the Republican Party (source). The Sun Oil Company is today known as Peoples Natural Gas and does not appear to be a part of the familyβs portfolio of holdings. Moreover, The Pew Charitable Trusts has expressed great concern over the environmental impact of fossil fuels, as well as oil
... keep reading on reddit β‘https://twitter.com/ShamsCharania/status/1477506675288514562?t=tTg3HGKUWM5vXXMkWJYkLg&s=19
Wtf is going on in Houston?
DNA Doe Project has identified the Twinsburg Ohio John Doe 1982 as Frank "Frankie" Little, Jr., a member of the R&B group the O'Jays. His remains were found February 18, 1982 in a shallow grave in the woods behind a machine shop on Cannon Road, with evidence of stabbing, blunt force trauma, and postmortem burning. It was theorized he had been deceased for 1-2 years before his discovery.
Not a lot of information seems to be available about his disappearance or when exactly his family lost contact, but he was believed to have been alive into the mid-1970s. Summit County Medical Examiner Lisa Kohler says she plans to rule his death a homicide.
Thanks to the DNA Doe Project and the City of Twinsburg Police Department, Little's family has some closure.
(I didn't see this posted yet, or any posts about this in general. If anyone knows of a write-up on him that I missed, please let me know!)
EDIT 2: The O'Jays sent a statement to Rolling Stone that said:
> Frankie was a guitarist and songwriter in the very early OβJays [...] He came with us when we first ventured out of Cleveland and traveled to Los Angeles, but he also was in love with a woman in Cleveland that he missed so much that he soon returned back to Cleveland after a short amount of time. That was in the mid 1960s and we had not heard from him after then. Although this sounds like a tragic ending, we wish his family and friends closure to what appears to be a very sad story.
EDIT 3: /u/Basic_Bichette pointed out this composition he did for the O'Jays on YouTube, if anyone wants to hear his work. Thank you!
ETA: What state. So
... keep reading on reddit β‘Hi all, Greetings from London.
Holding onto stocks that are declining feels very counter-intuitive and uncomfortable (if not depressing). But you need to focus on value and leave anxieties about news updates & headlines, future outlook and trends to other investors. The daily churn of gloomy/downcast media front page headlines can be overwhelming. Sure, I've have been muttering to myself : "President Xi Jinping .... Stop making speeches!!!".
But don't forget that if you want superior returns and performance, you must think differently to the crowds. This is why following trends and reacting to speculative news items and commentary is futile. For that reason, I think technical analysis provides such a limiting bounded view. Instead, look to buying stocks below some concept of their intrinsic value. Ask yourself - objectively - whether the Chinese state really intends to divorce itself from international capitalism? And how much of that is conspiracy theory / hysterics .
It can sometimes seem like End-of-Days but life goes on and everything returns to normal. The Stock Market Crash 2020 must have seemed like the end-of-the-world.
To illustrate this: In 1939, at the outbreak of WWII and conflict in Europe; the stock market sunk. Sir John Templeton seized the opportunity of the uncertainty & fear in the markets. He bought 100 shares of every stock selling less than a dollar. He held all the stocks (even the ones facing bankruptcy); and when life returned back to normal: he made 400% in four years!
Most people are no doubt somewhat familiar with the Pew Research Center, with Sam often citing figures from Pew studies as though they were gospel truths. The Pew Research Center claims to be a βnonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the worldβ. Moreover, the Pew Research Center claims to be agnostic with respect to public policy, not taking a position on public policy at all. However, I will argue that these claims by the Pew Research Center are misleading, that it is deeply rooted in Evangelical Christianity, and that its religious orientation biases not only its choice in what to research, but how it conducts its research, and what findings it hopes to elucidate.
But first, a history lesson (or two). The Pew Research Center began life as a legitimate research organization β the Times Mirror Center for the People & the Press β in 1990. The goal of the organization was to conduct opinion polls and to make their findings available to the press so they could report on how well (or how poorly) government policies aligned with the will of the people. While one might question how apolitical an opinion polling organization can really be when its primary funding source is a media organization, this isnβt the subject of the present debate. In 1996, and for reasons that are not entirely clear, the Times Mirror Center for the People & the Press came under new management by The Pew Charitable Trusts, which among other things, funds The Gospel and Our Culture Network (source). The Gospel and Our Culture Network describes itself as βa network to provide useful research regarding the encounter between the gospel and our culture, and to encourage local action for transformation in the life and witness of the churchβ (source). That Pew Charitable Trusts would provide funding for an overtly religious organization is consistent with the history of the organization. Joseph Newton Pew, who began the familyβs fortune after having founded the Sun Oil Company, was a member of the Presbyterian Church and the Republican Party (source). The Sun Oil Company is today known as Peoples Natural Gas and does not appear to be a part of the familyβs portfolio of holdings. Moreover, The Pew Charitable Trust
... keep reading on reddit β‘Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.