The magnetic field expands outward in a loop from the north as south magnetic poles. Itβs my understanding that the magnetic field protects us from solar radiation (although does result in a problem in its own right from the van Allen belts here or why we canβt walk around on Europa for example). Does the magnetic field or ionizing radiation from the belts somehow concentrate around the magnetic poles to cause DNA damage? Would a person be subjected to direct solar radiation at these places?
The internet is giving me too much junk and Iβm just trying to figure out an answer.
I was watching a video that was going through information in hbo's chernobyl and showing what of it is and isn't true. At one point, he said that birds with black feathers were often killed more quickly because black absorbs more radiation.
I knew obviously that this is true for uv radiation, I've felt it first hand. But I was under the impression that this was not the case for beta gamma and alpha radiation. Am I incorrect?
My mom says 5g kills people because a nurse on FB said it, and an engineer said it. She said ''have you heard of non ionising radiation'' and i said yes, she said it kills cells and they're putting up masts and she says she saw a huge one today and she says ''this is mass genocide'' but i haven't been sick in years. she kept saying a town with a 5g mast has tons of cases.
Nuclear radiation is capable of ionizing the atoms it hits. But, does it ever knock out electrons from the 'source' atom ?
Hello, I am trying to find a magnetobiology study that shows the relationship between non-ionizing radiation and extracellular vesicle induction.
To my knowledge there are multiple studies of Ionizing Radiation and Exosome induction; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5029112/
Please post here if you have access to these studies.
https://www.agoravox.fr/tribune-libre/article/les-effets-sanitaires-du-230850
The health effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation: FIAT LUX
Diafoirus, AgoraVox, February 11, 2021Β (Google translation from French)
' Medicine without memory is the ruin of man'
A rat, a spoon and an ambassador have changed our perception of the health effects of electromagnetic radiation.
In the beginning there was light. After 9 months rocked by the earth's magnetic field in the mother's womb, light is the first electromagnetic radiation that welcomes us. And if we are what we are, it is because of or because of these natural electromagnetic fields. And all was for the best in the best of all possible worlds until in 1745 we were able to store static electricity in a bottle filled with salt water (1746 Leyden bottle). From there, technologies using electricity have multiplied: power line, lighting, telegraphy, radio, radar, screen, computer, mobile telephony, communicating meter, 5G and tomorrow the Internet of things.
Accompanying all this, we noted the appearance of a new pathology, described in 1869 by an American neurologist and which will change its name with technological developments: neurasthenia, telegraph disease, radio wave disease, radar operator disease, screens, telephony illness, syndrome of intolerance to electromagnetic fields or electrohypersensitivity (1).
We also noted the explosion of pathologies known for a long time, such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases including hypertension and cancer (2).
Caricaturedly, we can say that from the beginning of the 20th century, scientists were divided into two camps, on the one hand, physicists supported by the authorities and industrialists who asserted that non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation could not be harmful to the environment. man as long as an intensity limit is not exceeded, and on the other hand biologists, botanists, zoologists, veterinarians and physicians who see the effects of low doses of electromagnetic radiation well below the thermal threshold fixed by physicists (3,4,5,6).
In 1960 the US military imposed the physical standard of ten million microwatts per square meter, as the dose limit not to be exceeded for a thirty minute exposure. And since this standard, which takes neither chronic exposure nor biological effects into account, has been imposed on the Western world and govern
... keep reading on reddit β‘In fiction, particularly science fiction, we see and hear a lot about energy shields. From natural to artificial, they all share the same function: Protecting a person or vehicle from harm.
So that got me thinking: If energy shields can protect against blades, bullets and whatnot, could they protect against ionizing radiation, such as alpha, beta, gamma and neutron radiation? How would they do it? And has some fiction explored the concept?
Fiction that explores this concept is welcome, but they must come with a brief description or at least an educated guess on how they do it.
