Personally, I'm tempted to get Monster Hunter Stories 1 despite the missing content. The Last Campfire looks pretty alright too.
Thoughts?
Stop with the 4chan memes. Stop jerking each other off over how correct you are, and how wrong everyone on the left is. Stop saying we should get Kyle Rittenhouse on stream. Stop saying "there's an equal amount if misinformation coming from both the right and left." This shit is getting out of hand and I don't want this sub to go off the rails. Then again, when Destiny cultivates a community of supporters who obsess over correcting every single piece of misinformation from lefties, while simultaneously overlooking/ignoring a lot of the shit that the right does, I'm not really that surprised.
As a reminder:
A lot of Republicans think Donald Trump didn't lose the election. A lot of Republicans think that Democrats are a group of satan worshipping pedophiles. A lot of Republicans believe January 6 was just some boomers walking around the capitol. A lot of Republicans believe Alec Baldwin should be charged for what he did. A lot of Republicans think the vaccine doesn't work. A lot of Republicans believe Covid is a hoax. A lot of Republicans believe climate change is a hoax. And there's much, much, more...
But yeah, a lot of lefties said stuff that wasn't true about the Rittenhouse trial, so I guess it all cancels out right???
EDIT: for those of you straight up denying reality, saying "dgg never did this", I spent a out 5 minutes browsing the sub and went and collected some comments for you all. Here's some examples of people defending Rittenhouse, downplaying his dumbass actions, repeating right wing talking points (he killed a pedo, etc):
>What was reckless on Rittenhouseβs side? Wasnβt it reckless on the side of the aggressors (Rosenbaum, Huber, Grosskreutz, etc.)?
>But isnβt it reckless to be burning down businesses? Isnβt it reasonable that some people would try to defend that property?
>he brought the AR to defend his friend's business. After it was concluded he was carrying legally I don't know what you can use against the kid. I'm not going to make Clint Eastwood memes because everything that happened was sad, but I don't think Kyle was wrong to be there.
>You know what? No. Fuck that. I believe that he genuinely cared about this community which he was a part of and he had every right to be out there. He's not a hero but he's not stupid either for doing something he deeply cares about.
>It wasn't reckless, according to the laws and a jury of his land. Why are you trying to slander him? He was entitled to defend himself, whic
... keep reading on reddit β‘[SS] I mean, I know the answer, I just have to ask. One of the forensic investigators said about one of the videos on his computer that:
>"It's one of the most offensive videos that I'm familiar with throughout my whole career," Fottrell said in court, according to the outlet.
Is his proximity to Trump associates causing them to ignore the trial? spoiler >!Probably!<
Iβve always gotten the impression that in real life, prosecutors and defense lawyers are not just allowed to say ridiculous things or ask ridiculous questions to bias the jury, knowing that an objection will immediately be raised. This happens in the show a lot, but is that even allowed in real life? Iβd imagine a judge would lose their shit if that happened.
Any insight on this, or other unrealistic things from the showβs trial sections?
INTRO (feel free to skip)
In normal BR, I've killed people so fast from 50+ meters they don't even have a chance to react, and vice versa. For those who say "but the game won't be as casual", I've played apex for hundreds of hours strictly casually, 3-4 matches every day or so, the matches lasted longer (due to high TTK) and were more enjoyable. I spent less time in searching for a new match just because I got randomly 1 shot from some unknown window, or laser beamed in less than 0.5 seconds. My movements mattered, my gadgets mattered, my quick snaps mattered, but in warzone, once you've been locked on, you're usually insta dead.
SO....
Low HP + Laser Weapons = no chance to react = no FUN
Low HP + High Recoil / Bullet drop = Chance to react = Fair game
High HP + Laser Weapons = Chance to react = Fair game
With no travel time and no bullet drop, snipers are a 1 shot threat that forces players to camp literally out of fear of having their entire game shut down by 1 bullet from any 360 degree angle from 69 possible windows. Time to Kill (TTK) is incredibly low and makes whatever loot you've gathered from the start have truly low impact since they can't save you once you're caught. With the zone forcing us to travel through large terrain with little to no cover, it makes no sense that you don't have a chance to survive if you get caught out there. There is so much value gained from holding an angle rather than moving from area to area and actually play the game. Iron Trials has clearly shown us why our HP needs a buff in normal BR (at least in SOLO).
Advantages of buffing HP :
- More tactical gameplay (gadgets like Stim/Smoke get a chance to shine in the midst of heat)
- Time to react to campers and snipers gives a fighting chance and promotes moving location
- Movements play a greater role when kiting rather than getting downed almost immediately
- Reduces the power of aim assist since players get a chance to outmaneuver it
Disadvantages :
- More difficult to win outnumbered fights
- Nerfs hard to hit gadgets like Knives and Thermite grenade
- Unrewarding sniper headshots
Give me your thoughts below, I will add any good points to this list.
December 23, 2021 | Link to article
Jurors are still deciding Ghislaine Maxwell's fate, set to resume deliberations on Monday.
One juror question indicates they're scrutinizing the reliability of one accuser, Carolyn.
Another question is a clear-cut win for prosecutors trying to put Maxwell behind bars, an expert said.
On Wednesday afternoon, the twelve jurors deliberating Ghislaine Maxwell's fate gave everyone a surprise.
No, they hadn't come to a decision yet. And no, they wouldn't reach one before Christmas.
That the jurors needed more than two days to decide whether Maxwell would be found guilty or acquitted of six complicated counts wasn't necessarily unexpected. Maxwell, a child of the former British media baron Robert Maxwell, stands accused of trafficking girls to Jeffrey Epstein for sex, and sometimes participating in sexual abuse herself (she's denied the charges).
Jurors in other trials have taken longer for less complicated allegations. But the prosecutors and defense attorneys had both previously expected the jurors to want to go home before the US District Court in Manhattan closed its doors on Thursday, ahead of Maxwell's birthday on Christmas Day.
Alison Nathan, the judge overseeing the case, squeezed closing arguments and her charging conference into one marathon day on Monday, giving them a couple of hours to deliberate in the late afternoon before continuing on Tuesday and Wednesday. When she offered to keep the courthouse open for them Thursday, they responded with a note: "No, thank you."
The jurors are scheduled to resume deliberations Monday. So far, they've sent just a handful of juror notes with questions.
Three legal experts Insider interviewed cautioned that the information we have thus far is too limited to draw strong conclusions about what jurors may be thinking, except that they're taking the testimony from accusers seriously.
But Lisa Bloom, an attorney representing eight Epstein accusers, said it may be a bad sign for prosecutors that the jurors still haven't come to a unanimous conclusion.
"There may be at least one juror who has a reasonable doubt. Over the weekend that could grow," Bloom told Insider. "I've watched hundreds of juries and high-profile cases, and many in my own cases. And when they decide to break and take a long holiday weekend and come back, I think that's generally a
... keep reading on reddit β‘