Hi everyone; I have about 27 codes that need redeeming for Tox, if possible I'd like to combo them with pikas. I understand the time is running out so I am not pressing anyone to complete!
I am looking for Z/C codes and Dada codes right now. I can offer the 2018 legends or gf Keldeo/Jirachi on my sheet for redeems currently.
I'm heavily considering doing a Dada lang set, for which I will need codes. Once I have that I will create an edit on my post (should I decide to go through with lang sets on dada) to ask for more help on redeeems.
For Milc codes (1 star, 1 ribbon) and JPN Pc Pika (ENG tagged) I'm looking for other events or a very nice rate for Z/C.
Sorry if I missed anything, and I hope to strike a deal with you guys :)
Hi everyone, pretty self explanatory here! I only have HOME and Shield unfortunately so trades will have to happen there.
Please either drop a sheet or offer something along with what you want in exchange!
Only comment if you have pokeball flair or higher, and please make sure to provide all necessary info when offering event Pokémon :)
Hi All,
Just want your opinions on whether this is wise / a cheesy strat.
I'm playing the Jays from their foundation, I am a new player and admittedly TRASH at the game. But I am enjoying the trial and error and finding things out.
This year my minor leagues suck, lots of potential but very little in the way of current ability I could call up reliably if needs be.
One 'pro strat' I have used just prior to Spring Training is going through all of the 2.5 star + ability FAs and offering ALL of them MiLC.
Of course, the majority are in their 30s but still have some big league potential if they needed to fill and now my AAA team is stacked with older players with higher ability than the team before.
Will this strat damage me in the long run? Will I regret it? Or Can I use these old timers to help me out along this season (and maybe longer if they've still got juice left) to plug the gaps until my prospects are ready?
Any insight appreciated, many thanks!
I am brainstorming and looking for ideas on how to improve established digital camera systems that are for still and motion picture photographers. I learned that lowering downstream electrical noise will improve low light performance and dynamic range more than anything else. From a technical perspective, a camera with a high base ISO is superior. The problem is not everyone wants to use optical ND filters (on sensor or on lens) to fix the issue of too much light. Many photographers, especially still ones, think larger recording areas always mean less noise because the fluctuations are not magnified as much. For film, that's true. For digital, larger sensors alone don't affect noise. It's mostly about electrical design.
With current cameras, you must make a choice between a focal plane shutter, a leaf shutter, or a rolling electronic shutter. These all create problems when trying to use a wide aperture, a flash, and a broad daylight environment. Leaf shutters enable faster flash sync and expose the whole frame. The problems with leaf shutter lenses include higher weight, complexity, price, and less freedom for optical corrections. With focal plane shutters, the shutter does not expose the whole frame at once. With HSS flash sync, it lowers the flash power and raises the burden on the batteries. This is because shorter low power bursts are used to mimic continuous light. Rolling electronic shutters have similar problems.
With the Organic CMOS sensor idea from Panasonic, I read that the gain can be adjusted to produce step free ND filter characteristics without the optical ND filters. Ideally, I would want the sensor to have a high base ISO (like 800 or higher) and have ND filter like characteristics to enable more light to hit it when you want a low ISO like 100. This way, the sensor can have an ISO of 100 or 800 or anything in between all while having equal image quality when exposed properly (for example: get 16 stops of dynamic range at ISO 100 or 800). Is this technically feasible? I know with Panasonic cinema cameras, exposing for 100 will cause clipping in many circumstances while many cameras start at ISO 100 and won't clip as fast.
To enable fast flash sync speed without HSS or leaf shutters, my idea to have the whole sensor start and stop the photon collection process at the exact same time. This is to enable only one burst for flash at a shutter speed of 1/8000.
Other ideas include a hardware based hot pixel detector. If the sensor det
... keep reading on reddit ➡For background, I am a college student working on a BBA in Management at Houston Baptist University. I do photography on the side. I have many side interests and look for problems to solve, brainstorm, and seek ideas for solutions. I took an astronomy class too. The sketch and write up is in the link below.
I'm aware that the sketch is oversimplified. This one page sketch and description took 40 minutes.
An Asus phone with an a periscope enabled optical zoom is part of my inspiration; the device was still thin. The Light L16 uses and array of small lenses and sensors to in theory create the forerunner of one large sensor and lens. The problem is there is no optical zoom. The only ways to narrow the angle of view is to either change arrays or crop after capture. Cropping is destructive to the output. Changing arrays is a hassle.
I know visible light telescopes on Earth keep the image sensor still while the mirrors are repositioned to cope with Earth rotation and vibrations. Likewise, I'm concerned implementing an optical zoom in the array without proper corrections will create overlap deviation. Precise overlap is needed in the array help prevent stitching errors. What optical principles will help maintain precise overlap regardless of focal length? I know with refraction of visible light, shorter wavelengths (violet) get refracted more, causing purple fringing. What optical principles and elements will help correct for this problem to make this and other aberrations undetectable by the sensor? The lenses will have adjustable nominal aperture for depth of field control. I'd like to produce the forerunner of having the depth of field of the f/2.8-f/16 range of full frame DSLRs. Will it be okay to include an element that takes the light and concentrates it onto the sensor? This is to raise the effective aperture with the same iris opening. The periscope principle is to eliminate protruding parts from the thin device.
What are some resources and research articles worth reading for this idea? I'm thinking about working with some physics students at HBU to make it happen. I'll go to a mixer for physics students this Friday evening. I'm thinking about connecting with people in Rice and or UH in Houston. Who and what are some other ways to connect with people I can work with to make it happen? What feedback do you have? What other advice do you have? Thanks in advance.
I am thinking about either getting the Nikon D5200, Sony a5100, Sony a6000, or the Fujifilm x-e1, x-m1, x-pro1, or x-t1.
My current camera is the Nikon Coolpix P330. I have used every type of manual control on it. I have changed the focusing mode and AE metering mode to work around problems. I save in RAW format on my camera. I have changed the startup focal length in 35 mm equivalent form to get a specific focal length. I have switched to full manual mode to gain full control and take long exposures. I have used shutter priority and aperture priority.
I like to take pictures of activities on Boy Scout trips and school events. I take pictures of my sister's sporting events inside a gym. I like to take landscape photos and light painting. I sometimes use it for self portraits (selfies).
I am also interested in photographing fireworks, star filled nights, and star trails. When shooting sports in a gym, I would like to use full manual controls to get the same exposure level in every photo. I sometimes photograph animals too.
With all of this in mind, which camera should I get?
https://preview.redd.it/bbxzklhfh6211.jpg?width=185&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5eaa7b6709240694deea0d2b348a9b4eb69dd092
About WdW MILC
Welt der Wunder TV is a substantial part of the media industry for more than 20 years. As a broadcast network we feature and produce docutainment TV-Shows and Channels on German, Austrian and Swiss TV. We are planning a completely new blockchain-managed license, trading and sales platform offering high-quality video content for the international broadcasting, VOD and online video publishing sectors.
The distribution platform is developed and used together with our partners Swisscom Blockchain and Swiss TXT. With decades of experience, we don’t enter a new market, but solve pain points by offering a sophisticated solution - with ongoing trading and good supply and demand.
The MILC token (MIcro Licensing Coin) is a utility token and the payment medium within the platform.
Bounty terms & conditions
Up to 450 000 Micro Licensing Coin tokens (MILC) are allocated for the bounty campaign.
The final amount will be determined by: (sold amount / 20 800 000 MILC) * 450 000 MILC tokens.
1 MILC token equals €4.79 EUR / $5.54 USD
Bounty pools
Content: Articles, YouTube videos, Infographics - 55%
Twitter - 20%
Contests - 5%
Community Feedback - 5%
Translations - 5%
Bonus - 10%
For more information go to ===> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4393971.0
