Pro-gun explaining how guns can go against Bradley fighting vehicle

Listen, you fantastically retarded motherfucker. I’m going to try to explain this so that you can understand it.

You cannot control an entire country and its people with tanks, jets, battleships and drones or any of these things that you so stupidly believe trumps citizen ownership of firearms.

A fighter jet, tank, drone, battleship or whatever cannot stand on street corners. And enforce β€œno assembly” edicts. A fighter jet cannot kick down your door at 3AM and search your house for contraband.

None of these things can maintain the needed police state to completely subjugate and enslave the people of a nation. Those weapons are for decimating, flattening and glassing large areas and many people at once and fighting other state militaries. The government does not want to kill all of its people and blow up its own infrastructure. These are the very things they need to be tyrannical assholes in the first place. If they decided to turn everything outside of Washington D.C. into glowing green glass they would be the absolute rulers of a big, worthless, radioactive pile of shit. Police are needed to maintain a police state, boots on the ground. And no matter how many police you have on the ground they will always be vastly outnumbered by civilians which is why in a police state it is vital that your police have automatic weapons while the people have nothing but their limp dicks.

BUT when every random pedestrian could have a Glock in their waistband and every random homeowner an AR-15 all of that goes out the fucking window because now the police are out numbered and face the reality of bullets coming back at them.

If you want living examples of this look at every insurgency that the U.S. military has tried to destroy. They’re all still kicking with nothing but AK-47s, pick up trucks and improvised explosives because these big scary military monsters you keep alluding to are all but fucking useless for dealing with them.

Dumb. Fuck.

πŸ‘︎ 3
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ Dec 27 2021
🚨︎ report
Finished my second ever land vehicle and my 4th completed model to date, the Tamiya M2 Bradley fighting machine reddit.com/gallery/rcpul1
πŸ‘︎ 40
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/TDW-301
πŸ“…︎ Dec 09 2021
🚨︎ report
2 M3 Bradley Cavalry Fighting Vehicles of the 24th Infantry Division on a live fire exercise in Saudi Arabia, Operation Desert Shield, 19th December 1990 [879x588]
πŸ‘︎ 83
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/DecisionLivid
πŸ“…︎ Nov 08 2021
🚨︎ report
An Army Bradley Fighting Vehicle opens fire with its 25MM gun on anti-coalition forces during Operation Baton Rouge in Samarra, Iraq - 30 Sept, 2004
πŸ‘︎ 194
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/kingsaw100
πŸ“…︎ Aug 20 2021
🚨︎ report
Bradley Fighting Vehicle (BFV) with new suspension and track v.redd.it/rl9h55v4x8b71
πŸ‘︎ 660
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Enviicted
πŸ“…︎ Jul 14 2021
🚨︎ report
Anti-terror Forces (HAT) attend a Bradley Fighting Vehicle and mortar range hosted by Coalition forces in Hasakah Province, Syria, Sept. 29, 2021. Partner Forces continue to train with Coalition advisors to engage Daesh wherever they arise. #StrongerTogether twitter.com/SOJTF_LEVANT/…
πŸ‘︎ 13
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Ultrakurmanci
πŸ“…︎ Oct 02 2021
🚨︎ report
One of the many Bradley Fighting Vehicles (BFV) that I am working on.
πŸ‘︎ 494
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Enviicted
πŸ“…︎ Jun 16 2021
🚨︎ report
Redditor argues that the T-34 medium tank isn't a vehicle because "vehicles don't have weapons". I couldn't find anything to back up their claim so I'd wager it's an arbitrary definition that some organization uses. They're gonna be livid when they find out about the Bradley Fighting Vehicle.
πŸ‘︎ 39
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/AntarcticanSunSea
πŸ“…︎ Jun 17 2021
🚨︎ report
The griffin lll made by General Dynamics in order to replace the aging bradley infantry fighting vehicle
πŸ‘︎ 139
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/mypoophurts1
πŸ“…︎ Mar 12 2021
🚨︎ report
Bradley Fighting Vehicle Graveyard reddit.com/gallery/mrimj9
πŸ‘︎ 41
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/TimCreed
πŸ“…︎ Apr 15 2021
🚨︎ report
Military Engineering at its finest: The Evolution of the Bradley Fighting Vehicle youtube.com/watch?v=aXQ2l…
πŸ‘︎ 602
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/mouthofreason
πŸ“…︎ Sep 12 2020
🚨︎ report
For my third tank, I made the M2 Bradley, an American Infantry Fighting Vehicle. I hope you guys enjoy it :)
πŸ‘︎ 447
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Splodium
πŸ“…︎ Aug 31 2020
🚨︎ report
Pentagon Wars: A retrospective on the Bradley Fighting Vehicle.

And my title sounds like I'm the one doing the retrospective, but I'm most definitely not. I'm asking for people here to do the retrospective, preferably those with either deep knowledge or some kind of first hand experience using them.

This is the basis for the discussion.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXQ2lO3ieBA

And its easy to intuitively understand why the Bradley was so controversial.

So here's what I want to know.

#1 Can we know if the Bradley is a lemon (has it seen combat where it had a decent probability of being hit with something intended to take out a tank, are numbers available etc).

#2 If we can know if the Bradley is a lemon, is the Bradley a lemon?

#3 If the Bradley is not a lemon, would the advantages of the Bradley as pictured at the start of the video linked above outweigh the costs - the original version seems to be a hell of a lot cheaper.

#4 Was it worth the money? 5.6 billion, 3.2 mil per.

#5 Is it a Troop transport? What I mean by this is... do we actually ferry a large percentage of our troops in Bradleys, or do we use something else (Humvees, Trucks) that leaves our people more exposed.

#6 What was actually done following the controversy surrounding the Bradley to mitigate its perceived flaws? Were they mitigated, or did we just say fuck it and run with it?

I've had people tell me that the Pentagon Wars is a comedy not to be taken seriously... but I know its based on a book and as I said the claims made in it seem intuitive and obvious. The Bradley looks like a light tank - not a troop carrier.

I'm fairly jaded when it comes to military procurement, and I think that the Bradley is an interesting case because its got a deep rich history that came after significant controversy. Did it hold up? Did it get tested to the point where we'd know? Should it have been a much simpler design?

I'd have posted this in r/credibledefense but I think the mods there would balk, I'm guessing both subs have mostly the same userbase anyway though.

πŸ‘︎ 10
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/moses_the_red
πŸ“…︎ Oct 13 2020
🚨︎ report
Im going to once again point out Gaijins use of the wrong information on the M3 Bradley Calvary Fighting Vehicle.

U.S Army Video https://youtu.be/xqDgn-qXr0E?t=96
Note the M2 Bradley IFV is the current model we have in-game, and the WRONG MODEL, the M3 CFV does not have the Gun Pods on the side of the tank that the M2 has for the infantry to fire out of, and is missing 2 scouts as crew.

Picture of the M3 Bradley CFV https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/Two_M-3_Bradleys.jpg https://www.army-technology.com/projects/bradley-m2-m3/

πŸ‘︎ 5
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/deathshere
πŸ“…︎ Feb 03 2021
🚨︎ report
Hopesfall "Bradley Fighting Vehicle" youtube.com/watch?v=_tCap…
πŸ‘︎ 60
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ Nov 24 2020
🚨︎ report
A soldier sits in the gunner’s seat of an M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle while supporting Operation Inherent Resolve in Syria [5760x3840]
πŸ‘︎ 53
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/tankguy67
πŸ“…︎ Dec 26 2020
🚨︎ report
U.S. Army Soldiers field test the M-2A4 Bradley Fighting Vehicle in a series of maneuvers and engagements at Fort Hood, Texas, Oct. 24, 2020. Photo By: U.S. Army Sgt. Calab Franklin [6300 X 4200]
πŸ‘︎ 60
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/pwatts
πŸ“…︎ Nov 03 2020
🚨︎ report
U.S. Bradleys fighting vehicle reduces tensions with Russia in northeast Syria defence-blog.com/news/arm…
πŸ‘︎ 10
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Bojarow
πŸ“…︎ Nov 30 2020
🚨︎ report
UH Combat Mission Units: Bradley Fighting Vehicle youtube.com/watch?v=g0C-D…
πŸ‘︎ 29
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/OopsNotAgain
πŸ“…︎ Oct 09 2020
🚨︎ report
Bradley Fighting Vehicles sent to protect US troops in eastern Syria israeldefense.co.il/en/no…
πŸ‘︎ 15
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/straylittlelambs
πŸ“…︎ Sep 23 2020
🚨︎ report
Grafenwoehr, Germany. M2A2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle (960x668)
πŸ‘︎ 2
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ Mar 06 2021
🚨︎ report
This Is Why the U.S. Army Wants to Replace Bradley Fighting Vehicle youtube.com/watch?v=qrR1I…
πŸ‘︎ 29
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/teutonicnight99
πŸ“…︎ Jun 09 2020
🚨︎ report
US Bradley Fighting Vehicles being sent to DZ, going to be the heaviest armor asset the US has deployed to Syria so far. twitter.com/OIRSpox/statu…
πŸ‘︎ 60
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/LMR_Sahara
πŸ“…︎ Oct 31 2019
🚨︎ report
The US Army is trying to replace the Bradley Fighting Vehicle for the third time β€” again taskandpurpose.com/milita…
πŸ‘︎ 13
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Jurryaany
πŸ“…︎ Jul 20 2020
🚨︎ report
@CENTCOM confirms that Bradley Fighting Vehicles & Sentinel radar systems have been deployed to NE Syria "to help ensure the safety & security of Coalition forces." I suspect this may have more to do with Russia than ISIS. twitter.com/Charles_Liste…
πŸ‘︎ 10
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/TheFlood123
πŸ“…︎ Sep 19 2020
🚨︎ report
A combat dog of the U.S. Air Force taking a rest on a M2A3 Bradley Fighting Vehicle in Iraq, 2007
πŸ‘︎ 3k
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ Feb 13 2018
🚨︎ report

Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.