Interrogatories Puns

INTERROGATORY NO. 2: Describe each instance in which Samsung or any of its affiliates ignored, denied, reduced, limited, restricted, or declined to fulfill Netlist’s requests or orders for NAND and DRAM Products since November 12, 2015, including the reasons why such requests or orders were not fulfilled.

Link Below

https://1drv.ms/u/s!AmM5yQyuRYhlhacxat6nRLkpfhFO9Q?e=b8JxDC

Jason Sheasby Interrogatories 1 and 2 that were posted by HAP from the Court Document dated 6/10/21

1. For very type of Memory Module that Google has purchased, made, used, installed, operated, sold or offered to sell in the United States for the period of November 17, 2008 through February 7, 2021, provide information to fully describe:

-The category of the Memory Module (e.g. FB DIMM) and the category of the DRAM on the module (e.g. DDR2, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5).

-The design and operation of all memory and/or storage devices and circuit and/or logic elements on the Memory Modules.

-The begin and end dates for the Memory Module.

-The extent the design has changed, how it has changed and when the change was made.

-The date of the first commercial use of the Memory Module.

-To the extent any portion of the Memory module complies with a JEDEC Standard identify the relevant portion of the Standard.

-The date (s) of purchase, manufacture, and/or sale of the Memory Module and

-The supplier of each of the components in the Memory Module and the assembler of the Memory Module.

2. For every type of Memory Module that Google has purchased, made, used, installed, operated sold or offered to sell in the United States as of February 8, 2021 and through the present provide information sufficient to fully describe:

-The category of the Memory Module (e.g. FB DIMM) and the category of DRASM on the module (e.g. DDR2, DDR3, DDR4, DDR5).

-The design and operation of all memory and/or storage devices and circuit and/or logic elements on the Memory Modules.

-The begin and end date for the Memory Module.

-The extent the design has changed how it has changed, and when such change was made.

-The date of the first commercial use of the Memory Module.

-To the extent a Memory Module complies with a JEDEC Standard identify the relevant portion of the Standard.

-The date (s) of purchase ,manufacture, installment,and/or sale of the Memory Module and

-The suppliers of each of the components in the Memory Module and the assembler of the Memory Module.

'

My wife and I agree on all division of property and debt. She doesn’t really understand the process, and hired an attorney because she thought she was supposed to. Didn’t realize there were simpler options for an uncontested dissolution. I am self represented.

She has not been in contact with her attorney and he just served me with an Interrogatories form requesting a ton of documents, up to current date, when our agreed separation date it in 2020.

Is it normal to have to complete this with this in an uncontested divorce? I get that much of this might need to be listed in the agreement my wife and I sign. I am mostly worried that he is providing extra services that my wife (or both of us) may need to pay when it’s necessary.

Advice, pointers, all info appreciated.

I wasn’t sure how else to word this for title. Short version is we just received word from the judge we won our civil case for ~$8k. We did this because this person offered to invest our money for us, promised to return it, and has yet to do so with an insane amount of excuses. He’s continued communication with us but claims our money is tied up.

Now that we’ve won our civil case against him I told him we’d begin interrogatories and garnishment. He said he can start by giving us a few hundred each month to start and possibly more as time goes on.

Is there any reason why I shouldn’t delay interrogatories and garnishment so long as he does in fact start paying us back? The judgment is good for 5 years. So the month he doesn’t I can always move forward with it.

I live in Colorado.

Obviously, I'll answer all the questions but also, I feel like including some context.

Specially, my law school (I'm aware of the irony) sold my debt to a lawyer who got a judgment against me when I was mentally incapacitated due to mold-triggered illnesses (I was literally re-learning the alphabet when I got sued and don't remember it even happening).

Fast-forward to now, he wants to know about my bank accounts (I own $6.23 in a savings account bc I'm too poor to have a checking account), etc. I was thinking of including screenshots of my dozens of medical diagnoses according to two hospital systems and a letter from my Chronic Fatigue dr about how I shouldn't move, stress or even think too much bc it can cause "crashes" which have a cumulative negative impact on my health. I also was going to explain that I didn't know the alphabet when I was being sued.

I thought this might make him not waste his resources and my time (which as a spoonie is even more precious) in the future and that if we ever get in front of a judge, it could substantiate my claims and that the lawyer should have been on notice about my health /inability to pay.

Idk what good that does really, I did borrow the money and go to school but I haven't been able to work since 2018 and as the saying goes, "you can't squeeze blood from a spoon."

The only litigation I ever studied was civpro -which was easily my least favorite class in law school (I wrote contracts for artists in my day). Any insight would be great!

Thank you!!

I am not a tech guy. I understand the basics so I would love to hear from the techs specifically in Regard to how these Interrogatories 1 and 2 might have come up in the Samsung case?(Remember these are from the Google case)and for any legal eagles out there Interrogatory #4.

Interrogatory #3 we all know has been ordered to be answered "Fully" by Judge Spero as a separate order from the court. I have focused a lot on #3 but after Jason Shaesby "Notice of Appearance" in the Samsung case I think the answer is here in the other 3 Interrogatories. Legal Eagles look closely at 4 It asks specifically for legal advice pertaining to the 912 and during the "Interparties Review" (IPR) at the PTAB. Discovery is going back to 2008 in Rogs 1 and 2.

Excerpt From court Order: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO BRIEF THE ISSUE OF INTERVENING RIGHTS (Local Rule 6-1 and 6-2) [Document image below]

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant are currently engaged in discovery related to intervening rights; WHEREAS, the "Court ruled that ROG #3 must be answered in full," Dkt. 145; WHEREAS, Defendant has committed to provide a complete response to Netlist's contention interrogatory on intervening rights on July 2, (as to absolute intervening rights) and on July 16 ( as to equitable intervening rights);
WHEREAS, Defendant has committed to a complete document production based on a reasonable investigation relevant to absolute intervening rights by July 13; WHEREAS, Defendant has committed to a complete document production based on a reasonable investigation relevant to equitable intervening rights by July 30;

Points of Note: We asked for "Contention Interrogatory" upfront!!! Much of this should have already happened.

Explanation of Contention Interrogatory : “[T]here is considerable support for deferring contention interrogatories until the end of the discovery period.” B. Braun Med., 155 F.R.D. at 527(citing In re Convergent Technologies Securities Litig., 108 F.R.D. 328, 336 (N.D. Cal. 1985)); accord McCrink v. Peoples Benefit Life Ins. Co., No. CIV. A. 2:04CV01068LDD, 2004 WL 2743420, at *4 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2004); Fischer & Porter Co., 143 F.R.D. at 95; Connecticut Indem. Co. v. Markman, No. 93-799, 1993 WL 452104, at *4 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 28, 1993). This is because “[t]o force [a party] to respond at this stage in the litigation would require [the party] to “

My attorney gave me an example of the information requested in the interrogatories.

The income/tax/property sections were expected.

What I was surprised to see was the request for social media login information; profile, photo and posts. It asks for all websites visited and the login info. It also asks for a list of all people my STBXH has had sex with and their contact information.

He is going to be livid when he gets served with divorce papers. (He wants for us to live permanently separated because it is better for him financially.) When he gets a demand for all this personal information, I can't imagine how angry he will be and his reaction concerns me a bit. I am several states away, but I now have a worry about my safety. (Maybe I need to back off on watching ID channel.)

Is it normal in interrogatories to ask for so much personal information? My attorney says he can be held in contempt if he doesn't answer.

EDIT: I found the answer via a simple legal look up. 943.0585.(6) very clearly states:

(b) The person who is the subject of a criminal history record that is expunged under this section or under other provisions of law, including former ss. 893.14, 901.33, and 943.058, may lawfully deny or fail to acknowledge the arrests covered by the expunged record, except when the subject of the record: [FOLLOWED BY LIST OF EXCEPTIONS INCLUDING "DEFENDANT IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL" BUT NOT INCLUDING "DEFENDANT IN A CIVIL TRIAL"].

(c) Subject to the exceptions in paragraph (b), a person who has been granted an expunction under this section, former s. 893.14, former s. 901.33, or former s. 943.058 may not be held under any provision of law of this state to commit perjury or to be otherwise liable for giving a false statement by reason of such person’s failure to recite or acknowledge an expunged criminal history record.

There's a bunch of exceptions to the denial rule, including being a defendant in a criminal case. Being a defendant in a civil case is not listed as an exception. Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude that it is legal to deny an arrest in as civil case. This is true in Florida, but not necessarily true in other states.

So she has insurance, and her lawyer, the lawyer assigned by her insurance company, sent to her a list of "interrogatories" for her to answer. The lawyer will then prepare her answers and send them back to the plaintiff's lawyer. One of the questions is about her criminal history.

Also to note, she was not driving her car at the time of the accident. She had let her brother drive her car, and her brother was also listed as an approved driver on the insurance. Both her and her brother are older adults.

As I understand it, Florida has a Denial Rule which allows one to deny and not divulge an arrest covered under a sealed or expunged incident. Here is an excerpt of Florida Law taken from a Florida Lawyer's website:

> [Expungement] The person who is the subject of a criminal history record that is expunged under this section or under other pro

I have an assignment in which I have to draft interrogatories for defendants using FRCP and another using TRCP for any Enron case. I reviewed some of the civil cases and I am just overwhelmed on where to start. I have the form there’s just so much information I don’t know where to start research. Any advice is very much appreciated!

“Please set out and state where you were located from 8 AM February 25 2014 through 8 AM February 28th 2014.”

Day of gun day through the day after of Christian’s murder. Will they submit an answer to the question?

The Judge ordered Google over the weekend to fully answer Interrogatory #3! That should be coming out shortly and is in regard in part to claim 16 for which there is most likely no intervening rights and that is probably why the Judge wanted that answered. With that said, where is Googles answer or do they just intend to cut to the chase and settle?

Can my stbxw ask for photos and videos I have taken with a girl I started dating after she filed for divorce that are intimate in nature?

Wouldn't the girl in the videos and photos need to give permission to release them?

What actions can I take to prevent her from getting these photos?

There was no infidelity before she filed so I'm unsure as to what relevance it has.

Any feedback would help. Thanks.

Starting a thread here! WG and JM had until Jan 15 2021 to respond to interrogatories set out by the Defendants, since June 2020. They've had a pretty hectic life these last few weeks, I am not sure if they even made it to their court date this past Friday! Nonetheless, I'm eager to hear the outcome from Friday's ruling!

I recently received a Letter of Interrogatory Illegal Drug Use, asking me a handful of questions asking for more detailed information about drug use and about certain possible conflicting statements I made during my security interview. I have been reaching out to attorneys inquiring about how to respond, but I wanted to ask here if anyone has any experience with this and what ended up happening. Recommendations for attorneys that have expertise on this matter are also very much appreciated! Thank you! (Some additional information: I have been working at my new federal job for a few months now and this is for a public trust.)

Hello everyone, Virginia here, Virginia Beach specifically.

So I own my own lawn care service company. I have a client who hasn't paid his bill and I took him to small claims court and won (he didn't show up).

He has yet to pay, so I filed a summons of interrogatories.

I understand this is so I can ask him questions that he will have to answer, other than his job information (place of employment, address, phone number, etc) what other types of questions should I/am I able to ask him?

I tried to look for some samples online but everything was either for divorces or in deeply legal terms that I couldn't understand.

Also, do these questions need to be on a sheet that I give to him so he can write the answers down? Or is it all verbal?

Thanks in advance friends!!!

I have received an Interrogatory from DODCAF asking for additional information to supplement my SF-86 and BI phone interview, both of which occurred months ago.

I have been perusing the 2020 Industrial Security Clearance Adjudications site and I am aware of the Adjudicative Desk Reference, so I have some idea of what the outcome of this process will look like, but I am unsure how I should respond to the Interrogatory.

My main question is: should I get legal counsel to assist me with responding to the Interrogatory, or can I simply answer the questions myself? And, more broadly, are there any "gotchas" with Interrogatories that I should be aware of? My concern is that, because I have not applied for clearance before, my naiveté will harm my chances of getting a favorable decision.

Obviously I want to be completely candid in my responses, but I know that, for example, with the SOR they don't tell you that you can submit additional evidence to attest to your good character. In other words, I just want to know what I don't know about this step of the process.

I'm doing a mock trial for class and need a little nudge in the right direction. I feel a little lost. It's McNamara v. Energy dynamics.

State how many times you went to Christian Andreacchio's between Feb 20, 2014 and March 1, 2014 and describe what you did there each time.

t]he party serving contention interrogatories bears the burden of proving how an earlier response assists the goals of discovery” by showing that “early answers `will contribute meaningfully to clarifying the issues in the case, narrowing the scope of the dispute, or setting up early settlement discussions, or that such answers are likely to expose a substantial basis for a motion under Rule 11 or Rule 56

Rule 11 did not seem to pertain unless I read it wrong because it says it does not deal with Discovery. Rule 56 does pertain and it is in place to prevent unnecessary, Costs, and delays. Judge Spero asked for Googles Full answer to Rog 3 remember?

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_56