Classification of demons Puns

I’m a guy (22). I’ve been sexually assaulted. And living on a college campus I’ve certainly been coerced into having sex went I didn’t want to. Never has it crossed my mind to consider myself a “survivor”. I think the term is appropriate for survivors of rape, because it’s such an awful, vile, and dangerous act. But for sexual assault? Which could be something like a guy/girl grabbing someone else’s ass, I don’t think it’s appropriate. In my opinion, it’s kind of narcissistic.

I know not all sexual assault is just ass grabbing, or inappropriate comments, or just unsolicited touching in general. I know sometimes it probably has dangerous context with it. But I just don’t think it’s appropriate for someone who has their shoulder stroked, or butt grabbed to take on the title of “survivor”.

I don't own a car or drive, they are not open to using taxis to arrive to or depart from work in this instance. I am genuinely concerned that I may pass on or present with Covid 19 to either my family, colleagues, or any at risk individual as I live in Dublin City centre. It seems so unnecessary and entirely avoidable.

Hey guys! I would have posted poems for the last 2 days, but something came up and I couldn't focus on poems. But the important thing is that I have a poem for today. I want to thank everyone here for being so accepting of me, I really feel like I can express my true feelings here. I decided to label the different parts of my poems so that they have more structure here on reddit. I did write it in a vague style, and I'd like constructive criticism on it. Hope you enjoy!

The maze of demons

1. I recovered so much.

I scaled mountains,

I crossed seas,

I defeated monsters.

2. But now I'm here.

Back at the maze.

The maze is doom,

but I don't have a choice.

3. Every corner leads

to something dark,

someone evil.

He is my torturer.

4. But I've prepared.

The journey here

allowed me to collect

my shattered self.

5. The torturer still hurts me;

he still has power,

but I've gained power

to defend myself.

6. All I can do

is pray that I win.

Hello marine biologists and marine life lovers!

This week the slideshow movie I'm making for the little ones is "ALL MARINE LIFE". And I'm a little at sea, as it were.

I like to have nice cards that separate categories so it clear and it was easy with domestic animals, farm animals, reptiles and insects but I'm having trouble with the sheer diversity of marine life.

Here is what I have and I'm sure I'm missing things. (Turtles and penguins were covered in previous movies about reptiles and birds).

I always put a PSA at the end telling kids that so many of these species are endangered because of humans and we are all responsible for protecting nature that can't protect itself against us.

I also include a few interesting videos at the very end that widen kid's horizons. For example in the farm one, I included a long section about amazing herding dogs and even some that run on sheeps backs. If anyone could suggest an appropriate end card for this video I'd be grateful. One thought was microscopic marine life and the other was marine plant life since I'm not covering those.

*******************

Original list with many mistakes is still below but here is the corrected list following comments' feedback:

>1) Mammals

>a) Whales
>
>b) Dolphins
>
>c) Seals
>
>d) Sea lions

>2) Fishes

>I. Boneless fishes
>
>a) Sharks
>
>b) Rays
>
>c) Skates
>
>
>
>II. Boney fishes

>3) Mollusks

>a) Octopus
>
>b) Squids
>
>c) Cuttlefish
>
>d) Bivalves
>
>e) Snails

>4) Cnidaria

>a) Jellyfish
>
>b) Corals
>
>c) Sea Anemones

>5) Arthropods

>a) Horseshoe crabs
>
>b) Sea spiders
>
>c) Lobsters
>
>d) Crabs
>
>e) Shrimp
>
>f) Barnacles

>6) Echinoderms

>a) Starfish
>
>b) Sea urchins
>
>c) Sand dollars

********************

1. Mammals

a) Whales

b) Dolphins

c) Seals and sea lions

d) Sharks

2. Fish

a collage of a large variety of the biggest, smallest, most colorful fish pics and videos I can find

3. Octopus and jellyfish

4. Arthropods

a) Horseshoe crabs

b) Sea spiders

c) Lobsters

d) Crabs

e) shrimp

6. Echinoderms

a) Starfish

b) sea urchins

c) sand dollars

Very much looking forward t

what are open source tools to classify point clouds in categories like:
Vegetation: trees, bush,
Urban Infrastructures: Roads, building Facade, etc

In the film The Lives of Others, a Stasi officer describes a personality classification of artists into five "types." The only specific type mentioned is Type 4, "hysterical anthropocentric," which refers to artists who thrive on interaction with other people. According to the film, the Stasi have particular methods of punishment for each type of artist. For instance, Type 4 artists are never allowed a public trial, since they would (apparently) thrive on the attention. Is this an actual classification? (If so, did the Stasi really use it?) If not, is there something similar?

If requests for resources aren’t appreciated, that’s fine, I’ll take this down, it just isn’t listed in the rules.

I’m doing my thesis in English on the >!disease model!< (don’t worry, the thesis is entirely against it). What sickens me, but doesn’t really surprise me, is that I can’t find anything other than some news sites which even HINT at the idea that >!autism!< isn’t a disease. Does anyone have any other kinds of sources, scholarly or not? I’d really appreciate it. I also am sure it’s technically an opinion, but I’m still disgusted that barely any sources even TOUCH on the idea, even to “discredit” it.

I’m also thinking of maybe having a survey of some kind concerning autistic people, their experiences (up and down), and their opinions on the matter. If you guys are interested, let me know (though it’ll probably be on a wider selection of people, since this one would have pretty biased results :P)

Thanks for reading! I really wanted to do my own reading, but I guess if there’s no reading to do…

Edit: So apparently what I’m looking for is the social model of disability. I had never known that there was a specific term for it until u/LilyoftheRally informed me. Maybe I just didn’t notice, maybe it wasn’t ever brought up around me (I’m betting on the latter). As much as I don’t consider being autistic to even be a disability on the face of it, this is definitely more relevant to my thesis.

Edit 2: Changed censored content to spoilers for ease of reading.

There are 3 types of humanoids in mope.io. They are the yeti, Bigfoot,and gorilla. The yeti has a lots of snow white hair with a blue skin face. The Bigfoot has brown hair with a more complex, yet similar, face. The gorilla is well, a gorilla.

The gorilla and Bigfoot share one huge quality, huge arms. This shows that both are built for the jungle. That is obvious but what is not so obvious is that both creatures are more related than the yeti(meaning they have a common ancestor that breaks off from the yeti). This also means that the yeti is possibly older than either creature.

The Bigfoot has much more complex face showing it has more social structure. It also has tools showing its intelligence and capacity for group behavior. The yeti however seems to be a rather anti-social(like me smh) that sticks to itself and scavenges the arctic for food. The blue tinge in the yetis skin is caused by lack of blood so it shows how the yetis face is constantly exposed to the arctic winds when it travels for food.

Although they all have differences the yeti and Bigfoot have very similar facial structure even if the Bigfoot has more adept facial structure. The gorilla has similar arms to Bigfoot showing their connection. So I can finally conclude they are all connected. I have named each creature accordingly.

Yeti: Hominid Arctica Bigfoot: Hominid Jungle Gorilla: Hominid Primitive

There is a visible group of people on Reddit who call themselves introverts and seem to all relate to each other, and there are other people who love talking and such and are called extroverts. I never understood this classification and feel like I can’t relate to either.

I know I am not an extrovert, because I love being alone. I spend the majority of my spare time in my room, either on my phone or reading a book. I can spend weeks or months without meeting friends and not feel anything wrong at all. I’ve never had a friend group, and I’ve never had anyone I meet regularly for social purposes, and I am completely fine with that.

But I also know I am not an introvert, and I can’t relate to most of the introvert posts. I love human interaction as well and especially like to talk to random strangers, both online and in real life. I am usually the person who start the conversation. I mostly travel alone, and just like talking to random people in my journey.

The problem is, I hate being with a large group of people, the more people, the less fun. Being with only one other person is the best, two or three is also fine, but higher than that I am starting to hate. This is probably because when there are many people, they usually just start talking about something I am completely uninterested in and can’t relate to. And even if the topic is relevant to me, it’s still difficult to make a focused conversation. The only exception is when everyone is playing the same board game (or other types of games) and follows the same sets of rules.

I hate parties and never understood why they are supposed to be fun. The few times I’ve been to one I just watch other people talk and dance and play games on my phone. They did invite me to join them, but I still found sudoku on my phone much better.

I know there are people who claim they’re introverts some of the time, extroverts at other times, but this doesn’t apply to me. I enjoy both being alone and talking with one other person but dislike conversation with a large group of people at any given time. So it’s always confusing to me why people seem to either hate human interaction or love it. Surely only a tiny proportion of people are like the textbook introverts or extroverts, and most are something like me, right? Or am I supposed to be the outlier?

I'm trying to classify a large number of products based on computer vision, and doing this manually is obviously time-consuming and expensive.

Are there any open-source libraries that would enable me to automatically classify my products into a particular type of product? e.g. Shoes, Sunglasses etc.

I am looking for a set of Image- and Scene-tags to label the images, and I want in particular a set of "segmentations" (e.g. "segment 1", "segment 2", "segment 3") for each image.

I know that the market place has an option to buy a set of labels, but I can find a way to get the set of images. I am considering buying the labels at about $2,500, but I am not sure where to buy them, etc....

https://preview.redd.it/w64s1gtvfga31.png?width=400&format=png&auto=webp&s=e7d4e79db8e3e13c6d39737b0d1b8db0c33f22d4

Link: https://github.com/benedekrozemberczki/awesome-graph-classification

The repository covers techniques such as deep learning, graph kernels, statistical fingerprints and factorization. I monthly update it with new papers when something comes out with code.

I’ve been working with class imbalance in other ML domains, such as images and one-hot data. These domains have tried and tested methods for dealing with imbalanced classes. For images, there’s methods that oversample the minority class using GANs trained on that class, or even zoom/crop in interesting ways to increase the size of the dataset. For simpler data, there’s a whole host of algorithms based on SMOTE that can create realistic “synthetic data” to balance datasets.

I’ve struggled to find these sorts of techniques in NLP. The best I’ve come across is something like “translate your sample into French using google translate, then translate back into English and add that to your training set”.

Have any of you come across better ways to deal with class imbalance in NLP?

Now that we've been introduced to Succubi & Incubi from Helluva Boss, what other forms of demons will show up next in Helluva Boss/Hazbin Hotel? I'm hoping we get to see more of the Ars Goetia demons or maybe even half-demons.

Material objects are, in general, composed of molecules, of which the building blocks are atoms. The periodic table gives a classification scheme for the kinds of atoms, called elements, which can occur. We have very probably a complete classification of all naturally occurring elements, although it is conceivable that we can make more.

Similarly, integers are built out of primes in a unique factorization. There are infinitely many prime "elements", but we don't know just exactly where the next one is going to show up. The prime number theorem does give us a sense of how they look if we squint and peer out over the horizon, and I believe the Riemann hypothesis would provide more clarity if proved.

Finite simple groups are another class of "atoms", and their classification is a monumental result in algebra that I probably will never understand. Abelian groups, on the other hand, are much easier to classify, even when infinite ones (that are nevertheless finitely generated) are allowed.

My question, then, is this: What are some other "periodic table" results in mathematics? Are there other subfields in which some important class of objects was largely or completely categorized?

We all know intersex and other sex variations that go against the male / female binary. But what other minority conditions exist for common categorizations in biology? For example are there any outliers in how we define a human being?

Id love to read as many examples as possible.

So my problem is, I have made a text classifier model, to predict if a part of the text, lets call it block, has information about the owner of a property. What happens is that the model performs good on a test environment, where each document is split manually into blocks, but in the production environment the document is sent to an OCR and is impossible to assemble the result into the blocks I want, and if the block is not built right the model doesn't get the prediction right.

I was thinking if there are any way to make this segmentation/split combined with the classifier, kind of like a CNN, where it classifies and gives the position where it found that information. Has anyone been through this problem?

https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-018-1908-3

.. essentially they’ve removed all the seperate categories, and have one overarching “PD” diagnosis, that then is further defined with reference to severity and the main symptoms.

I think it’s great. I think it’s less about labelling a person as “being” something, and more about describing what’s going on.

I think it recognises the complexity and individuality of humans, and I hope that it will help with stigma.

Hello everyone! I am an undergrad and I recently got a hang of machine learning and Python and I have developed a whatsapp bot (without the pro feature) using selenium. The xray classification is done using a pre-trained ResNet CNN. For beginners who want to know how to build Python whatsapp bot, I wrote a medium article on this very topic. The lung Xray classification code can be found on my Github here.

Disclaimer: The medical results from the code I have provided are just for the purpose of showcasing deep learning and python-based bot capabilities. It is still not considered as professional medical advice.