DONE NOW GUYS THANK YOU!
Can anyone (with high karma) help me mod my laser so that it has the beam splitter? None of my friends seem to have this mod, it must be very rare but I know its possible.
I can donate 5k fusion cells for anyone who would do it for me.
Can someone please tell me if the diffractive beam splitter & diffractive optical element (DOE) are the same thing? I ran a quick google search, and it seems like the diffractive beam splitter is one specific type of the DOE, but not all DOEs are diffractive beam splitters. For example, the splitter has specific requirements for the etching pattern and depth/size of the etching pattern. Am I correct? Thank you.
As said does the 40% boost also go to the extra two shot or no? So first beam splitter shot does 40% does the second shot also do the 40%?
I have two linear polarizers that are crossed to each other. Each polarizer has an extinction ratio of 100 000:1. I put a non-polarizing beam splitter cube in between the two polarizer and the extinction ration becomes 1000:1.
Could it be that the surface flatness is poor and is causing wavefront error?
Please recommend one (except hdfury which is too pricey. What about this one? https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1361283-REG/hdfury_splitpro_4k_uhd_pro_splitter.html). Setup is appletv, tv and beam. Need to make a direct sound connection between ATV and beam due to huge latency caused by TV when dolby digital 5.1 works (when stereo everything works fine). Just bough one really cheap HDMI splitter (here on local Russian market), but beam didn't recognize it, so it didn't work. Ps Also, will CEC work with this setup and i will still be able to control apple tv with TV remote? Thank you
I currently have a bunch of Google speakers, so I use a lot of casting.
I purchased a beam for my home cinema set up, and simply added the TV to an audio group, however it doesn't always work the way I want it to.
I have a Chromecast audio lying around, issue is that the beam has 1 HDMI port, I was wondering if I added a switch from the beam that would go to the TV then a Chromecast audio.
Would the beam be able to output though the switch or not?
I had a splitter around so tried it (but it's not arc) so guess that didn't work.
But seeing as I don't need to output to 2 sources at the same time, I should be able to use the active source? Or am I missing something
Thanks!
Apparently splitters cant go on gat lasers in 76, which is dumb, so change splitter to focuser lmao.
In thinking of getting a sonos beam gen 2, and the one downside to it is the lack of hdmi passthrough.
Has anyone tried using an hdmi splitter or switch? I want to do this as i have a tv that only has arc, not earc. It can still do dolby atmos over dd+, but in order to get uncompressed audio, arc is not enough. I can bypass this all together if a hdmi switch works.
I only really need 1 input for it (at the moment). I want to split the output of my nvidia shield, send the video to the tv, and the audio to the soundbar, completely bypassing arc.
Is this possible? Arc still needs to work however, so that non shield inputs like my pc still output through the soundbar.
Title.
According to PTS testers, the so-called NW scopes are being removed from the game, which means that weapons with such scopes (obtained from injection or glitching) are no longer endowed with game-breaking range and damage.
This is about 40 percent of the battle won against hacked weapons. I have a solution to win another 40 percent of it.
Remove the existing beam splitter mod from this game.
This mod corresponds to an erroneous calculation when it comes to explosive energy weapons. I have attached a link to Angry Turtle’s video that explains this issue - https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xBpMfmAUMbg . Many of the more common hacked weapons, such as the .50 cal machinegun that sprays explosive projectiles, are modded with an explosive-energy-weapon beam splitter.
If the existing beam splitter mod is removed from the game, and a new beam splitter mod with the proper explosive-energy damage calculations is reintroduced as a new mod, then hacked weapons relying on the aforementioned mod will be virtually useless. As a corollary, legitimate legacy explosive energy weapons will still retain their explosive effects, but they will no longer deal such an absurd amount of damage. For normal players, we might have to spend a bit of materials to reinstall the mods on our legitimate weapons. As for players with hacked weapons, they will not be able to do so for their weapons, since such mods were only installed through external programs, and I am reasonably certain that such programs no longer work.
The last 20% of the battle concerns hacked weapons with some other weird modifications, such as MIRV launchers and even gamma ray projectors. My take is the same. Remove these existing assets and reintroduce them as a new mod.
Hi all,
I'm an engineering student working on a laser system project. The system requires a few (50/50) beam splitters, of which I've decided to use a cube geometry (since that seems to be the most common and simplest way to do this). However, looking at the prices of beam splitters on Thorlabs, they seem to be very expensive. I can see how these prices would be fine for lab use, but what if I wanted to commercialize my device? It seems that this would cost 3x$200 = $600 for the beam splitters alone, which seems like a very high cost for such a relatively minor component of a commercial device. How do those of you who are more experienced suggest I deal with this if I wanted to build a commercial device?
There are plenty of relatively cheap beam splitters available – probably from China – but I worry about the quality of such components. After all, I don't want to sell a product with low-quality components to customers. Then again, my understanding is that the Thorlabs optics are scientific-grade, but my commercial device won't be used in scientific (or even engineering) applications, so it's totally possible that scientific-grade components are way overkill, and so, from an engineering perspective (since we have to consider the economics/cost), it may actually make sense to use these much cheaper beam splitters. What do you think?
I would appreciate any advice you could provide.
Searched around but all the info was a few years old
