I am currently a law student in Australia and working on a paper in reference to my questions above but I am honestly stuck on what each one means and which one is more appropriate. I am finding mixed meanings to each one and very mixed reasons as it which one is 'better'. I have searched on this topic but a lot of the explanations I am finding are 15 page long research papers.
Any explanation/help would be greatly appreciated.
I thought about official or legislatorial, but they seem not specific enough and too related to law.
Ordaining is another I thought of, but it's too authoritative. I'm hoping to describe a conversation that is not related to law, but uses a very formal and polite tune, but is not authoritative in nature, rather it's the result of two very polite people having a friendly conversation.
I've noticed that in most of the legal documents they have very formal language. Is there any particular reason for such language. For instance, (All of the Undersigned participants shall henceforth .....) Instead of that couldn't they just say (all of the participants listed below should ... immediately).
Edward Snowden “Today Bitcoin was formally recognized as legal tender in its first country. Beyond the headlines, there is now pressure on competing nations to acquire Bitcoin—even if only as a reserve asset—as its design massively incentivizes early adoption. Latecomers may regret hesitating”
Link to the source: https://twitter.com/Snowden/status/1435320690404700168?s=20
This is a revolutionary moment. I'm proud to be part of the history. We are living in exciting times! Bullish on future of the Crypto!
I half-heartedly buy the black suits (I’m female, but men’s too, since I have swimmer shoulders, think Princess Charlene, and women’s blazers are too narrow mostly), but I cannot get used to blouses, shirts to be ironed, little scarves, pussybows (horror) and the like. It’s so difficult to dress in a way that still somehow resembles my freedom-loving personality and casual style (jeans, tshirt, boots, leather jacket). Do you have any tips? Thank you!
Citadel Securities filed its intention to sue IEX in October, which was shortly after Ryan Cohen made the first step towards revolutionizing global finance and dethroning Amazon by investing in Gamestop.
CNN: February 4, 2021
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/04/investing/wall-street-robinhood-citadel-iex/index.html
On the same day that Senator Elizabeth Warren demanded answers on Robinhood's ties to Citadel Securities and its affiliated hedge fund, the Chicago-based firm officially launched a legal war Tuesday against the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In previously unreported court documents, Citadel Securities asked a court to overturn the SEC's bipartisan approval of a trading method launched by IEX Group, the exchange made famous by Michael Lewis' book "Flash Boys."
The timing of Citadel's 77-page court filing Tuesday was unrelated to the recent market turbulence. Citadel Securities filed its intention to sue in October and the two sides agreed last fall to a February 2 deadline for a brief.
My Aunt is in the process of selling her property in England.
A neighbour has recently approached her claiming that part of my aunt’s courtyard that abuts the wall of the neighbours property partly belongs to them.
They have no physical access to this courtyard other than via my aunt's property. There is a line on the title plan approximately one metre from the neighbours wall, which the neighbour claims is the boundary.
My aunt has refused to engage with them on this without any further formal/official activity (edit, to prevent confusion after a few comments, this has all been through verbal discussion or passive-aggressive notes being put through the front door, rather than anything officially lodging a dispute.)
Her understanding is that the line on the plan does not denote a legal boundary, and access is adequately provided via the covenants.
My aunt has suggested the neighbour engages a boundary surveyor and would not obstruct a survey being done, as she is confident that the situation is as she understands it.
The neighbour has now written to say that as my aunt has not engaged with them further, they will tell the Estate Agent that is selling her property that there is a boundary dispute - despite them not having presented any evidence or a solicitor’s letter in writing to my aunt.
She's asked what their motivations are for pursuing this with her, and has been told it's because the neighbours want to put their bins in her courtyard. She doesn't understand how this behaviour is being amped up to the point where they want to get the Estate Agent involved.
What recourse does my aunt have, should the neighbour approach the estate agent? She is now terrified this will blow up the chance of selling her house.
So Luis is obviously trash and Devoin is a busboy/waiter but what is the down side to briana requesting formal child support? I understand child support payments would come with the fathers getting some type of visitation rights however any child case worker would look at their living conditions and award briana full custody? I also get Florida is a totally different state so just curious what anyone else things
Hi there, thanks for reading my post! My mom is currently in a sticky situation with a family member who she allowed to live in her house rent-free while my mom was living with my grandparents and acting as their caregiver in their old age. They lived in the house for 6 years and during their time they did a number of changes to the house, including adding an outdoor outlet, an extra spigot for a hose, tore down some drywall to expose a sealed-up window, and put numerous bird feeders around the property which attracted rats and caused an infestation that was never dealt with (they never took down the bird feeders). I need to add that the electrical and plumbing additions were NOT done by a plumber/electrician, they were done by one of the family members living in the house. He may have done them up to code but the fact is that now my mom either has to pay to have them removed or have an inspector come and approve them to prevent her house insurance being void.
My question is whether my mom is able to make a claim with the tenancy board to recoup the cost of repairs that need to be made to the drywall and for either an inspector to come approve the plumbing/electrical changes or to have them removed completely. There was never a tenancy agreement or any kind of documentation signed when they moved in so I'm unsure if tenancy laws would apply in this situation. Has my mom learned a costly lesson and is SOL?
https://www.letstalkhemp.com/california-cbd-gets-ok/
Having a suite of cannabinoids for when the legislators can get out of their own way should play well.
So this is probably a bit of a weird one, but here goes.
I was once a part of a high demand religion that compiles and stores exhaustive personal information records about each person who is a member of the religion (including all addresses going back years, phone and email, names of all family members and their phone and email, etc). This religion also keeps a tally of how often/the last time you attended church services, and they use personal records to conscript other church members to call you/text you/show up at your door in an effort to convince you to come back to church. Formally requesting that they cease contact with you is not an effective means to stop contact, because the centralized leadership of this church constantly exerts pressure on the rank-and-file to initiate contact with all "inactive" church members on file in the membership records at the local level. Even if you can get one person to stop contacting you, it is really a whack-a-mole game with everyone else who is convinced their salvation requires them to continue to contact others despite requests to cease contact.
The only way to stop unwanted contact is to get the religion to formally remove your records from their membership files. But, this religion has made it very procedurally difficult to have these records removed. Requesting removal without legal representation often results in the request being ignored and/or being stonewalled. Thus, getting these records removed often requires some form of legal process.
There is a legal nonprofit that offers its services for free for those that wish to have their records removed from this religion. I am considering using the services of this legal nonprofit, but wonder (1) if I will have to flag this on my bar application, and (2) what I should say about it. My state's application asks a very broad question about whether you have ever been a party to a civil matter, and while using this nonprofit's services does not result in a formal lawsuit, it is, in the broadest sense, a civil matter.
Is this something I need to self-report on the application, and if so, what should I plan to say about it? It's ridiculous that one needs to enlist legal services to get a religion to stop contacting you and compiling your personal information, but here we are.
