https://twitter.com/JoeyColeman/status/1455579766854234114?s=20
Some screenshots from the ruling are in the tweet.
Hello
Ex wife is bringing a motion of contempt on an endorsement that I don't have a copy of or I have lost it. How can I ask the courts for a copy of the endorsement? All I have is the judge's name.
Anyone know a good place to park downtown for jury duty? I’ll probably just Uber but wanted to see if there were any lots or anything people can recommend. Thank you!
Arraignment proceedings for Paul and Ruben Flores at San Luis Obispo Superior Court.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
October 20, 2021
- The men accused of murdering Cal Poly student Kristin Smart and hiding her body pleaded not guilty to the charges against them on Wednesday morning in San Luis Obispo Superior Court. Paul and Ruben Flores entered their pleas in person during a pre-trial arraignment. (SLO Tribune)
- Paul Flores, 44, of San Pedro pleaded not guilty to murder and his 80-year-old father, Arroyo Grande resident Ruben Flores, pleaded not guilty to accessory in the second arraignment in Smart’s alleged killing. (SLO Tribune)
- Paul and Ruben Flores both plead not guilty, the trial date is set for April 25, 2022. (Ava Kershner, Mustang News)
- After a 10-minute hearing this morning, the trial of Paul and Ruben Flores is scheduled to begin on April 25, 2022. (Chris Lambert, YOB)
- During an arraignment Wednesday morning, defendant Paul Flores entered a plea of not guilty and his attorney said he denies all allegations. (Dave Alley, KEYT)
- Both men entered not guilty pleas, for a second time, at Wednesday's arraignment. Lawyers for the two men deny all of the allegation made by prosecutors. (KEYT)
- Sanger also announced he intends to file a 995 motion, which will ask the court to consider dismissing the case. The motion will be filed sometime before Dec. 17, 2021, and will be heard at a separate hearing in early 2022. (KEYT)
- Paul Flores is charged with the murder of Kristin Smart. According to the District Attorney, they believe that murder was committed while Flores was in engaged or attempting to commit rape. (KSBY)
- Conviction of the above offense will require Paul Flores to register as a sex offender. (KSBY)
- The prosecution announced that they now plan to admit evidence in the trial of prior alleged sexual acts done by Paul Flores. Those acts include incidents described in previous police reports and digital evidence. (KSBY)
- Superior Court Judge Craig van Rooyen set a trial date of April 25 after conferring with attorneys earlier Wednesday morning in chambers. Paul and Ruben Flores both acknowledged their right to a trial within 60 days and waived their right to delay the case to April. (SLO Tribune)
- A closed in-chambers conference between the judge, attorneys and t
Haven't done jury duty in 10+ years.
Got a summons for midweek, did the online check in, and it says I'll get told if I need to go in or "do things:", it's on the 18th.
How is it working now? What's the procedure? Zoom? In person? How much heads/advance notice?
ActiBlizz allege that because of ethical violations by the State of CA and the DFEH the lawsuit and investigation must be thrown out because they're now contaminated. Judges on the Superior Court of LA County ruled that the lawsuit and investigation will continue through the courts as it has and ActiBlizz must pursue any ethical violations that they claim happened on their own and bring it up in court.
TLDR - The lawsuit and investigation are going no where anytime soon and ActiBlizz are going to settle out of court or go to trial, judges are not going to throw any of it out.
Does anyone else have concerns with Tammy Stokes running for Chatham County Superior Court Judge? I was in her court room years ago and got the chance to see her rule on several traffic violation cases, and I was not impressed. Maybe she was just having a bad day, but from what I witnessed, she lets her personal feelings and biases influence her decision making. She was incredibly condescending and unprofessional in her courtroom. Like I said, maybe she was having a bad day, but I would like to hear what other people's experiences with her have been.
I had a landlord years ago who owned several properties throughout Toronto - I found this out after moving out. He keeps all of his properties under a holding company name, not his name/id.
Received my judgement in superior court in 2019.
Enforcement has been incredibly difficult and costly. I can’t afford to keep moving forward with a lawyer at this point. I have a lien and writ on all the properties I could find under his “company”, but no address for him in order to have the sheriff enforce.
