Lue Elizondo has spoken a few times about the possible energy sources of the craft he studied for so long. At least one time he mentioned that they may use the hydrogen from water as the source.
30Apr2021 https://youtu.be/emn6jozxHxU?t=583
I assumed, like most people, that they would extract the deuterium or tritium for nuclear fusion. However, after reviewing older videos, one of his comments REALLY caught my attention.
22Dec2020 https://youtu.be/odP4dBo-54M?t=1660
Did he say that they have reason to believe that they are breaking the proton for energy production?
Breaking the STRONG NUCLEAR FORCE?
By current mainstream understanding of physics this is not possible. The strong nuclear force is orders of magnitude stronger than the other forces.
Additionally, the further you move quarks apart, the apparent force between them grows exponentially!
That would be enough energy to power the planet for a century or destroy the world with the amount of matter found in a cup of water.
This is a huge development! How would this be possible? Why would he suspect that they are using the strong force? Are there any theoretical underpinnings on how that would be possible? Why didn't the interviewer pull that thread?
Is this one of the reasons why disclosure has been suppressed for so long?
For those unfamiliar with the Lue:
Luis Elizondo is the former head of a Pentagon office tasked with investigating craft that seem to have time manipulation capabilities and some form of quantum mechanical propulsion system. He still retains a TS clearance and is involved with the public disclosures regarding the topic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Elizondo
Edit:spelling
https://www.sciencefacts.net/weak-nuclear-force.html
There's a definition of time from the Oxford dictionary that states " Time is the indefinite continued progress of existence and events in the past, present and future regarded as a whole. "
The progress of existence and events is causality. This definition is saying that time is responsible for causality.
Causality is things influencing other things. Interaction is defined as " Reciprocal action or influemce " meaning that causality is a result of Interactions.
So if causality is a result of interactions and the 4 fundamental forces are responsible for all interactions then isn't it these 4 forces that are responsible for causality rather than time ?
In addition as fundamental is defined as core or foundation, this means that there cannot be any other underlying layer for time to play a part.
Time merely tracks and measures events, it's the 4 forces of nature that sets them in motion.
After carefull examimation of the forces and their operations, I have come to the conclusion that tje 5th force is Chuck Norris.
Title
Gravity and electromagnetism seem quite similar in that they are forces based on the mass and charge, respectively, of the objects involved. Do the strong and weak nuclear forces have similar properties that the interactions are based around?
So the Strong Nuclear force is like the Weak force with a short range,
The range of the strong force is about 1x10^-15 meters, (so quite a short range)
The weak force has a low range as it's communicated by massive particles, that are so massive they can't actually be created so they have to interact with a virtual W-boson ,
The electromagnetic force has effectively infinite range because photons are massless
but the strong force is communicated by gluons, gluons too are massless. So why (like the electromagnetic force) doesn't the strong force have an infinite range?
Would a person safely behind a building be okay, but a person at the same distance from detonation while in the open be vaporized? Are all the "Nuclear shadows at Hiroshima" pictures at a specific limited window of distance from detonation?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXg2P9dx-GM I associate nuclear explosions with obliteration of their surroundings, like this. Is this inaccurate?
What goes further, the burn/vaporization distance or the shockwave/explosion distance?
Watched a documentary on atoms last night and it was going about the strong nuclear force that holds atoms together. This we know this is the basis for the bondsmith powers. Does the cosmere have a name for strong nuclear force?
Fair warning, I am a layman and do not really understand the strong nuclear force, apart from the most basic wiki descriptions.
That said, I recently read Liu Cixin's excellent "Remembrance of Earth's Past" series, in which he explores ideas of technology relying on breakthroughs in fundamental physics. In that vane, I'm curious what sorts of technologies or applications are being imagined as possible with a greater understanding of something like the strong nuclear force.
just out of curiosity but will the binding energy within the nucleus be the same as the energy required to overcome the strong force?
I thought the net force had to be 0 in a stable nucleus so that they stay together, but some textbooks suggest that strong attractive force actually overcomes the electrostatic?
Long ago, the four forces existed in harmony.... ...but everything changed when supersymmetry collapsed
I'll show myself out.
I know that the strong nuclear force only acts on things at the quantum level, but if we were to figure out how to magnify its interaction to a macroscopic level, what would be the outcome? Would it be like gravity except magnitude stronger? Could we use it as a propulsion method?
Lue Elizondo has spoken a few times about the possible energy sources of the craft he studied for so long. At least one time he mentioned that they may use the hydrogen from water as the source.
30Apr2021 https://youtu.be/emn6jozxHxU?t=583
I assumed, like most people, that they would extract the deuterium or tritium for nuclear fusion. However, after reviewing older videos, one of his comments REALLY caught my attention.
22Dec2020 https://youtu.be/odP4dBo-54M?t=1660
Did he say that they have reason to believe that they are breaking the proton for energy production?
Breaking the STRONG NUCLEAR FORCE?
By current mainstream understanding of physics this is not possible. The strong nuclear force is orders of magnitude stronger than the other forces.
Additionally, the further you move quarks apart, the apparent force between them grows exponentially!
That would be enough energy to power the planet for a century or destroy the world with the amount of matter found in a cup of water.
This is a huge development! How would this be possible? Why would he suspect that they are using the strong force? Are there any theoretical underpinnings on how that would be possible? Why didn't the interviewer pull that thread?
Is this one of the reasons why disclosure has been suppressed for so long?
For those unfamiliar with the Lue:
Luis Elizondo is the former head of a Pentagon office tasked with investigating craft that seem to have time manipulation capabilities and some form of quantum mechanical propulsion system. He still retains a TS clearance and is involved with the public disclosures regarding the topic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luis_Elizondo
Edit: spelling
Title
