Cuz damn
We're all buying from the same 1,100 movies so it obviously won't be THAT unique, but still..
I'm thinking Matewan or Breaker Morant from my own collection. I've seen them mentioned a few times in passing in comments only, and while I'm sure I've missed dozens of examples proving me wrong, I almost never see them posted on anybody's purchase haul or in whole collections.
I used to think Friends of Eddie Coyle but I see that more and more now I feel like. Maybe I'm just noticing it more now that I've seen (and loved) it.
That dream with the collector makes me either think the demon had something particular going on that made it standout or it could of practically been any being, human, demon or even a witch that can get transformed into a curse scroll. I wonder if it’s more the concept of trapping a living being inside another living being then anything in particular about the owl beast itself. What your guys thoughts?
So, instead of a king, the people wanted to rule themselves through a republic. They did so in part by because of a religious enlightenment. And instead of meddling in foreign affairs they were isolationist. Now, I wanted the aesthetics of the nation to be similar to early America, but politically it seems identical. I want some focus on the religious aspects, making it different from the Christian god but not sure how.
Any ideas would be appreciated.
I've been getting back into the game recently as a semi-noob who last played Conquerers and I feel like every game I go through this process of being like "oh nice, a big infantry bonus, they must be a good infantry civ!" only to find that they're missing armour upgrades or they don't get Champion, meaning their Two Handed Swordsmen are maybe as good as a Champion anyway. Is that adding anything to the civ, really? Maybe they don't have to research Champion but it's just saving a few gold. Seems like there's loads of examples of this. I'm sure it's for balance reasons, but I want unique techs to provide something actually unique!
I’d say about 80% of death songs follow this pattern:
-intro -verse -chorus -bridge -solo section -small bridge (optional) -verse -chorus
Despite following this pattern often, every single song still sound unique. Insane.
Like lots of unique and interesting teaching methods, field trips, or extremely powerful magic/inventions
Edit: if you choose to take this as a prompt, let us know :)
During the run up to world war 1 and the end of world war 2 weapons had a lot of very unique looks
Some had: Side loading stick mags, Side loading drum mags, Top loading mags, Stripper clip box hopper feeders, Top loading belts ,
And nowadays you basically have just some sort of magazine on the underside of the receiver (barring some standouts like the p90) and machine guns that load belts from the side.
Did these older weapons have some sort of distinct advantage that helped during their wars or was it a case of just figuring out what worked and what didn't work as quickly as possible during arguably the fastest pace of firearms development?
First off, they shouldn’t even be performing the Story of Baby Jesus in a public high school because it violates the separation of church and state law. Secondly, yes, Kitty wanted the role of the Virgin Mary in the play, but instead of just playing fair and trying out for the role like everyone else who wanted it did, she spent her time openly demeaning Unique, Marley, and Tina for trying out/performing the role themselves, then inexplicably got handed the role by Unique at the end of the episode for bitching about it and demanding it from her.
I’m just so annoyed by RIB rewarding bitchy and unprofessional diva behavior on this show. They’ve done the same thing with Rachel at times, too.
When attempting to go to www.reddit.com/create it will re direct you to r/TalkativePeople . This sub has no rules, no pattern of posting and just doesn’t make any sense why you should be redirected ,
The sub just seems to be taking snippets of what other users have said on reddit and posting it to r/TalkativePeople for no apparent reason and it just seems like this must be bot orientated.
Am I missing something or is this just a weirdly unique subreddit that just has an auto direct formed from the link.
When a TV show gets cancelled, that's it.
You have the memories, you have the original series, you have the references and memes and remixes.
And there's nothing more to worry about. It's over.
Game Grumps got cancelled when Jon left, but by some mystical force, episodes kept going up on youtube. So we're sitting here watching further seasons of [show we like], and they're just not good, and we don't understand what happened, and we just keep hoping it gets good again, but it's not going to, because [show we like] was cancelled.
They just brought it back without changing the name. But they changed the setting, the characters, their personalities, their dynamics, they added plot points and complexities that nobody needed to enjoy the original series, and they degraded the visual and audio quality in the process.
And we're stuck trying to enjoy it because our brains can't comprehend "It's over" when it just keeps going. One of the old directors fills in for a few episodes and there's resounding applause. This is it! We're finally getting more episodes! But then the existing characters continue being terrible caricatures of themselves and the illusion is shattered.
We're riding a motion simulator ride at a theme park, and the ride stopped, but the 3D video scenery is still playing, and we're afraid to get out of the spaceship, because clearly it's still moving. But it's not moving. It stopped. And we're too dumb to realize that the background movement doesn't mean the ride's still running.
It's safe to get off. But it's too hard.
:(
A little backstory to maybe help explain what I'm trying to do.
I have a large list of historical client financial data (monthly investment account contribution amounts). In the past, each client's contribution transaction activity has been reported out of one single account. Our firm now offers multiple "virtual" accounts per client, with new transactions for the overall client now being broken out into their separate accounts at varying percentages.
So, each client may now have anywhere from 1 to 20 separate "virtual" accounts, each account with a different allocation percentage.
For reporting and performance purposes, I need to go back and break out each of the individual, historical contribution transactions into their "virtual" accounts at the assigned contribution percentages. Each virtual account number will obviously be unique, and have a contribution percentage assigned to it.
I've created an simplified excel document with fake examples of the data I'm working with.
Sheet 1 contains the client contributions on specific dates that I will ultimately need to figure out how to breakout into individual contributions at the assigned percentage per account.
Sheet 2 contains a list of all "virtual" accounts that a client has, and the corresponding allocation percentage.
Below is an example of what I'm trying to achieve, except in reality I have tens of thousands of rows of individual contributions. An individual client could obviously have many contributions occurring on different dates.
In this format, I could then just do some simple multiplication to get the broken out amounts and use that to build a template and import them into our system.
I've been trying to wrap my head around this. Perhaps my limited understanding is making this more difficult than it needs to be, in addition to the data not being in an ideal format for this task, and clients not having the same exact number of accounts.
I found a very lengthy workaround using vlookups on sheet 1, and then doing "backwards" vlookups on sheet 2 off of the value pulled into sheet 1 from the original vlookup, and deleting off any matches on sheet 2, and repeating. But I feel there has to be a better way.
