A list of puns related to "Surface energy"
In some sources I read, it is written that surface energy can't be negative. However, this doesn't really make sense since surface energy should be negative if molecules on interphase have lower potential energy compared to the bulk.
If molecules on the surface experience interactions or bonds more favourable compared to bulk, surface energy should be negative. This doesn't happen often though, so surface energy is positive for most interphases.
What makes it harder for electrons to resonate in smaller particle sizes?
As a graphic designer and artists, my laptop is the most expensive thing I own. I have lost so many computers to wayward energy drinks, especially since my son was born.
A few years ago I made a policy for myself that I NEVER set a drink on the same surface as my electronics. This lead me to get side tables everywhere that I work. There is always a comfortable place for me to put my drink, and when my son flies by on his tricycle and knocks into my desk my drink spills on the floor.
I am interested in the possibility of increasing the radiative cooling of large ice masses (glaciers and polar ice), for obvious reasons. It seems clear that accelerating the migration of heat energy to the surface during cold periods would accelerate radiative cooling to space during night/dark/cold periods. Non-wicking heat pipes should accomplish this and act has highly conductive thermal diodes.
What I am not equipped to estimate is the rate of energy transfer. This is required for estimating the costs and benefits for such a system. If you are qualified to model these systems, I would love to hear your thoughts and explore the viability of a heat pipe-based system for the preservation of glacial and polar ice.
Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.