When a state's statute of limitations on "fraud" is 10 years, what kinds of fraud/cases does that cover? For example, if a landlord fraudulently evicts you after complaining about the safety conditions, etc. of an apartment, is that a 10 year statute of limitations? If a conservator fraudulently settled a $1,000,000+ case for $5,000, despite the objections of the person they are caring for? Does it cover only fraud in regards to monetary activity or is it any kind of fraud in relation to anything?
Thanks.
The statute of limitations for medical malpractice is anywhere from two to six years. But the effects of a circumcision performed on a baby boy cannot be fully known until he is 30, or 40 years old. If the statute of limitations were to be extended to 40 years, victims of circumcision could at least get some kind of compensation for their pain and suffering. If the health industry decided to take it to court, the victims would also be able to tell their story, in a court of law, under oath and it would become part of a public record. Circumcision litigation would be so lucrative that ambulance chasing law firms would put ads on TV about it. Which would increase the public's awareness of the dangers, physical and economic, of circumcision. it would completely eliminate the money motive that the health industry has towards circumcision. Finally, it would change America's attitude toward circumcision.
Here is the format for proposing amendments:
- No amendments/[amendment]
The amendment stages are for the following:
This is a perfect example of why it is so important that states either eliminate the statute of limitations on CSA cases or at a minimum, create windows of opportunity for once excluded cases to come forward.
And the next step is to get the word out and make it visible to the public as broad as possible. So victims long since silenced know they have the opportunity to seek justice.
Look forward to the day the org shares a similar headline. As we know they have a list at least twice the size as the one mentioned in this case.
βMany of the lawsuits followed the Los Angeles Timesβ publication in 2012 of internal Scout records involving about 5,000 men on a blacklist known as the βperversion files,β a closely guarded trove of documents that details sexual abuse allegations against troop leaders and others dating back a century.β
Boy Scouts seek bankruptcy under wave of new sex abuse lawsuits
Their 14 amendment rights to due process were also violated by Kratz's press conference professing guilt before either individual ever stepped in a court room, under the US constitution, you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Steven and Brendan's 14 amendment rights were violated once again by LE not allowing a coroner on the Avery property to properly assess, document and recover the supposed human remains found in Steven's fire pit, a civil right that is afforded by law to every other in the US
The 14 amendment violation continue to grow in Steven and Brendan's cases along with numerous brady violations(6), When will they be treated as equal US citizens and qualify for due process US law, the same law afforded to everyone else in the US,the same law Wisconsin fails to recognize and obey.
I received a parking ticket in October 2017 which I planned to contest in court and submitted the request for review form by email to the parking enforcements. I had some correspondence with the ticket reviewer who told me that to contest the ticket I would need to plead my case to the court judge and issuing officer when I received summons. They said the usual time is about 60 days after to receive summons, but, I never got any. I did follow up with them and they said that because my licence plate is in two people's names, it might not have been picked up in their system.
It's not been over 2 years and I have sent another email asking them about it's status, but am applying to schools outside of NS don't know if I get the summons later how hard it will be to come back for them. Is there a limit to how long summons should be issued after a ticket? Or is it something that could come at any time and still be viable?
Okay, a bit of background on this; when my was a kid visiting some relatives in Japan, some maniac shot him with an arrow that turned out to be able to grant certain people the power to control spirits or something called "Stands" or something. Because he survived, he got powers... but he and his Pureblood wife had no idea how these powers worked so they kept them secret. And because my mom was a Witch and my dad's a Stand-user, I inherited both.
Well, I was on Winter Break when I realized that there was another Stand-user killing No-Majes in my small, rural town. Now, most other Stand-users are exclusively No-Maj so they don't even know about Wizards, and those who do know about Wizards do not trust Aurors for being overzealous.
So, I had to... handle things myself. Now, I didn't use my Wizard's Magic (they don't let Ilvernormy students keep their wands outside of school) but my Stand's powers are very close to the untrained eye.
Should I just be blunt with them about my Stand or risk prosecution?
