I see a lot of "leftists" calling the pizzagate theory bizarre but after looking into it, I couldn't help but notice a lot of weird things.
Any business owner knows that the decor is very important to the atmosphere of the business. It has to tailor to the target audience. Here, it's supposed to be family, including kids. But no one (aside from the conspiracy theory enthusiasts) seems to question the disturbing artwork. So I found an article where the artist, Arrington De Dionyso, complains of the unwanted attention and the article says, "He was basically given full artistic license to paint whatever he wanted. And he did. He had no plan of what he was going to paint when he started —no sketches or anything like that."
Ummmm...I'm a children's book writer and when I choose illustrators, I am careful of who the illustrators are and I check their style, past artworks, and I never give them that much freedom. Of course, a mural is different, but if the result is provocative, you would naturally have the sense to tell them to re-do it.
But either way, I looked into the style of their artwork and it's just as gory, if not worse.
So, why? Why does no one see anything weird about this? If people can't believe the whole underground pedophilia, wouldn't it put some ideas in people's heads that maybe HE might be one at the very least?
https://preview.redd.it/12z5uzbkz5051.jpg?width=700&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=9b92c14458f54a2a5187a32e61231616317b3856
