Edit/add: I’m in the states. BA in Fine Arts. Currently work for a new home builder. I work on the sales side. I get paid well, and it’s just my income so I am concerned a out leaving to start the M.Arch path. Currently, 48. I was thinking of waiting a couple of years before pursuing so I could put some money aside for the program. Hence, starting at 50. Also, would really love to do some of the work online-is that even possible? If so, then I could get started sooner. Anyone have suggestions for schools? Suggestions even to my pseudo-plan? Thank you in advance!
I should rephrase. How much DWAC MC? 10 billion DWAC
I think for people to develop a healthy mind they need to have some level of trust in the people and authorities around them. The idea that authorities are corrupt beyond repair is being pushed all the time in order to make people develop an unhealthy egotism. I think even the conspiracy movement serves this purpose in a large extend.
Children should be taught to value truth since they are small, be it through mathematics, history and learning about ethics in general. The current Post-Modern state, in which extreme nihilism and irrationality dominate many places is a result of the ruling class destroying meaningful authorities.
I need some assistance with this question please, I'm completely clueless
Let P(x) and Q(x) be two predicates and suppose D is the domain of x. For the statement forms in each pair, determine whether they have the same truth value for every choice of p(x), Q(x) and D, or not.
i. ∀x ∈ D,(P(x) ∧ Q(x)), and (∀x ∈ D, P(x)) ∧ (∀x ∈ D, Q(x))
ii. ∀x ∈ D,(P(x) ∨ Q(x)), and (∀x ∈ D, P(x)) ∨ (∀x ∈ D, Q(x))
Basically what the title says. Do you think that there is one (or more) true epistemology?
This is something I had never thought about before, but it seems to me that they wouldn't.
Like, do foundationalism and skepticism have truth value (I recognize that skeptical scenarios do)? Or is epistemology more of a tool than a theory akin to a metaphysical theory?
I guess my intuition would be that it would be something analogous to grips in drumming. Some might prefer matched over traditional, or traditional over french, but there isn't a true grip.
I'm interested to hear your thoughts. I don't know wether this is something that is discussed in epistemology, or wether I'm just missing the obvious answer.
Like all of 2D geometry is based on points, which can't exist irl. They are zero dimensional so they can only have meaning when an outside observer is pointing to them. That's perspective.
All of math, geometry, and architecture is based on this "lie". If you really want to live in a world without subjective truths, you need another damn brain my man. It's about acting as if it was true, then it becomes your truth. You must first believe in order to see, that's the "leap of faith."
Heaven and hell might be real in the sense that moment you hurt someone consciously you become the devil, because remember, as a 3d point moving through 4d space, the pain seems gone but it's still there. Reincarnation can be real too, it's just a different way to conceptualize the same idea. It doesn't matter if it's a human invention, the result of Darwinian processes, given to us by space aliens, or whatever. The specifics don't matter, they're just different routes to arrive at the same destination.
Looking at it from an outside perspective, it's a real eternal hell of your own creation. That's the point of faith, it's a way to live as if you could see four dimensionally. Again, It doesn't matter if it's really divine, the point is to act as if it. Even though I know morals aren't objective I choose to act as if they are. The problem is that it's near impossible to communicate this without these advanced concepts that we share (if you get me, that is).
So religion really is just is a story that your parents tell you to get you to behave as if you had the perspective that you will one day acquire. It doesn't matter if you use the story you were given, or a different one, or one you created, it just matters that you behave somehow.
My ex-girlfriend would always say "But I don´t want to hurt you" when tough talks had to be had. She would keep feelings of herself and mine as a higher value than being truthful about harsh realities.
I hurt her but there was never a logical conclusion that I never meant it and would make it better, because the feeling of hurt was more important than the want to fix what had been done.
If you were dumped out of nowhere, if you were told comforting things by your dumper, they were and probably still are afraid of the truth and how it affects others.
She stopped caring about my feelings as soon as it ended. She tried to befriend my friends, she got a rebound and told her lies about the ashes of our break up. To people who value feelings the most (often people pleasers), they often never care about how their actions affect others out of their life by butterfly effect, because being seen as good is of value to them. They´ll never understand their cruelty because no one in their life will risk telling the truth since it hurts and that is the higher value.
Attempt not to mourn people who wouldn´t tell the truth. They are weak and you are better than them.
For some kind of civilization to exist there must be some kind of authority figures or a people with a certain common historical background and traditions. I think there is a value in preserving truth itself in order to fight against the nihilism present in society.
There's a lot of effort to make people forget about their own history and destroy the idea of facts all together. Nihilism is one of the most dangerous weapons the evil groups in power and Intelligence groups can use to destroy values.
As much as people may not like it and run away from it, I believe in an almost superstitious way that truth has to be defended, all the more when it comes to the people that want to corrupt the idea of it for their own ends.
This is not financial advice and don’t take my word - validate it all on your own. I am not advocating for anything. My only goal is to ensure that you have good information to make YOUR INDIVIDUAL DECISION. Don't trust a video. Don't trust a screenshot. Validate EVERYTHING!
TL;DR - the control of your shares flow like this: retail broker -> street name -> Cede and Company -> DTC -> Hedgies
As many people already know, when you buy a share through a retail broker, the share is held in “street name”, not your name. Here are two sources to validate this fact:
“When you buy securities through a brokerage firm, most firms will automatically put your securities into "street name." This means your brokerage firm will hold your securities in its name or another nominee and not in your name”
“There's a staple of modern-day investing that surprises even savvy investors: If you own stocks, but you don't have any paper stock certificates, then chances are that those stocks aren’t being held under your name. Rather, most stocks these days are held in the “street name” of the broker, rather than under the name of any particular investor.”
https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/its-your-stock-just-not-your-name-explaining-street-names
But, what and who is “Street Name”? Its actually an alias for “Cede and Company”. Here are two sources for you to validate that fact:
“The vast majority of publicly traded shares in the United States are registered on companies' books not in the name of beneficial owners (i.e., those investors who paid for, and have the right to vote and dispose of, the shares), but rather in the name of "Cede & Co.," the name used by The Depository Trust Company ("DTC"). Shares registered in this manner are commonly referred to as being held in "street name."
https://www.sec.gov/comments/4-537/4537-25.pdf
“In the US, Cede & Co., a nominee of [Depository Trust Company](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Depository_Trust_Compan
... keep reading on reddit ➡
I think for people to develop a healthy mind they need to have some level of trust in the people and authorities around them. The idea that authorities are corrupt beyond repair is being pushed all the time in order to make people develop an unhealthy egotism. I think even the conspiracy movement serves this purpose in a large extend.
Children should be taught to value truth since they are small, be it through mathematics, history and learning about ethics in general. The current Post-Modern state, in which extreme nihilism and irrationality dominate many places is a result of the ruling class destroying meaningful authorities.
