https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oaI3fXeC8gI
i've got to say, i like several things about this hearing.
- Boyce seemed to take actual charge. He talked substantially right at the start making it clear what the purpose of the hearing was, and designating who got to talk when.
- Archibald got straight to the points that he wanted to make. Primarily that he would prefer a chance to meet with Lori since she may not even ahve known Means had been disqualified.
- Archibald seemed far more collaborative than either prior or means. Said he was prepared to proceed immediately if the court chose to do that. Also said that he's open to working with the two LDS lawyers to see if any of the issues can be resolved without needing a hearing.
- He says openly that she 'has a mental illness' and / or 'is mentally ill'.
- Doesn't seem to be a person who argues from an emotional point of view.
Hello, I just rcvd a notice from my internet provider regarding copyright infringement for a something and that my ISP is being subpoenaed for my personal information.
Given the below options.
- Do nothing: See if I get lucky.
- Fight: Send a objection letter with some documents to the court
- Surrender: Try to contact the plaintiff for Settle with paying.
What is the best option? Could anyone please advise me if that's my correct choice or if there is something else I have to do.
Hello! What documents need to be submitted for a subpoena dices tecum in DC? I know for Maryland we need to submit a subpoena, notice of intention, certificate of service, schedule A, notice of compliance, and business records form?
The subpoena may be found HERE.
Sounds like KZ wants to subpoena Barb? If true, that is huge.
The subpoena may be found here :)
Hello,
I received a subpoena to appear and produce documents to a plaintiff's attorney. I am non-party and out of state (Michigan). The subpoena states I must serve an objection within 21 days after the day of service, but the date to appear was only 16 days from date of service. Do I need to respond?
I'm currently unemployed and take care of my partially disabled elderly father who has stage 4 cancer, so traveling the 600 miles from MI to another state is not an option. I also do not have any documents they are requesting.
I'm not sure what to do, any advice would be appreciated.
thanks
Opposing counsel requested and was granted an expedited telephonic hearing for spousal support. Hearing is on Wednesday. My boss wants me to send out a Subpoena Duces Tecum to opposing party's new boyfriend. I've never issued a subpoena with request for documents for a telephonic hearing. Has anyone ever done this before? Ideally we want to get this guy in-person at our office, but I'm not sure that we can even require that given that the hearing is telephonic.
I was thinking of drafting something along the lines of "
You are hereby commanded to appear telephonically before the Circuit Court for the County of XXXXX, State of Oregon, on April 8, 2020 at XXX p.m., as a witness on behalf of the Petitioner in the above-captioned matter.
You are commanded to produce for inspection on or before the above time and date at the (Law Firm Address), each and every document or paper in your possession or control including, but not limited to...XXX).
Thoughts? Thanks for anyone who replies on such short notice. :)
Having pro se appealed a J&DR custody case in Roanoke, Virginia to circuit court, I subpoenaed the local DSS for their records regarding their interviews with me as well as their separate interviews with my 9yo son. The city attorney has filed a motion to quash, citing confidentiality rules. Am I entitled to their notes of these specific interviews? If so, how do I properly respond to the motion to quash? Should I expect an answer from the court before trial?
Trying to find out whether a party has an obligation to share documents obtained by subpoena with other parties.
Obligatory Throwaway. Located in Ohio.
I have done some amount of work as an expert witness, which primarily consists of producing an expert report after reviewing relevant documents and evidence. Occasionally a deposition follows. Not my primary business, but an enjoyable, paying add-on to my existing business.
On very rare occasion, I receive an incredibly broad subpoena requesting every financial and business detail a person could possibly have for the last 3, 5, or 10 years. Normally a phone call or two sorts this out and I provide just the relevant documentation to the particular case. Occasionally I draft a letter rejecting those items which are completely irrelevant, providing those which are relevant, and summarizing financial details which may be interesting to that lawyer in the aggregate but which providing in an itemized fashion would be unnecessary. I've never received a follow-up from the sender of the original subpoena to this sort of objection on my part. I had a lawyer draft a version of the letter which I use as a template each time.
I've recently received a version of this request via mail that asked for everything under the sun, and requested compliance by the very next day after receipt of the letter (e.g. letter dated on the 1st, received on the 6th, deadline of the 7th). My question is this:
TL;DR: Can a third-party/expert witness object to a subpoena for documents on the basis of inadequate time to comply and retain the right to object on different grounds once you've had proper time to consider the request? Or is it vital that you object for every conceivable reason up front so that all possible objections are noted by the initial deadline? Any other general advice for dealing with these dragnet-style subpoenas?
Hello!
I come to my fellow redditors for help in preparing a SDT against an apartment complex my father and I currently reside in.
Quick context: My dad is 100% disabled (two horribly mangled feet) following a forklift accident 13 years ago. He requires service dogs. He was a homeowner before the crash about 8 years ago. His last dog is passing away and we had certified a new dog.
Upon reading up on the fair housing act, we found out them charging my father a pet deposit and monthly pet surcharges were unlawful- we had made them aware at the time the dog was certified before moving in, so no attempted cash-in here.
He attempted to talk to the property managers- they stated his lease agreement did NOT show he had a pet yet they charged him for a pet anyway.
In any case, he fell ill several months ago and was unable to pay the rent on a timely manner- he had contacted the property manager again and said that, given the circumstances, he had grossly overpaid. While he was in the hospital, they conducted an inspection of the unit's carpets, stating the condition would determine if we were eligible for a return on the deposit.
As you can imagine, the carpets were not in the best of shape. They then served us for unlawful detainer for the rent that was not paid. We have responded, claiming we have overpaid.
As it stands now, my dad has gone back to the hospital with an infection that could very well take his life. I have taken time off of work (I'm a CDL truckdriver) and am currently doing a life-style change so that I can be closer to home and help him through these difficult times.
I have already contacted Project Sentinel, but that's a separate matter.
As it stands, I'm looking at the SDT form and my next step is to subpoena the records of our lease. I've already attended a workshop for our reply so I know where to put the names, where to put the case number, etc but what is my next step in this?
TL;DR My dad is dying, and cannot defend himself against the unlawful detainer notice- his intuitive son needs guidance to make sure he doesn't fuck up his defense. Please help.
As the title says. I was mailed a letter to my workplace and not my personal address. The thing is though. I don't know who that person is under the case name. I'm actually really confused about this because I've never heard of someone being sent this letter. The form is CR-125/JV -525. The only thing checked off is "Attend the hearing. Jury Trial"
I would be greatful if anyone could share a template.
Edit: Crap, i got the date wrong. it's not the 28th as stated in the title, it's the 29th which is wednesday. her'es the notice of the hearing: https://coi.isc.idaho.gov/docs/case/CR22211624/120821%20Notice%20of%20Remote%20Hearing%20-%20AmendedRedacted.pdf
Nothing else is going on, so this is the most 'exciting' thing on the near horizon. for those unaware, early in december mark means issued an subpoena duces tecum to the lds church. he was asking them to produce 'any and all' information and documentation pertaining to chad's excommunication and/or his membership activities while in the church. the church has pushed back and filed an application to have the court either quash the subpoena outright, or limit the scope of what they have to produce. that's the purpose of the intended hearing.
[meanwhile, or perhaps simultaneously: the state responded very strongly and asked for the court to impose actual sanctions on means. prior jumped on the drama wagon and filed his own demand for information out of the state. means filed a reply to the state's response that was practically incoherent . . . but none of that is officially on the agenda for this prospective hearing. i just mention it to fill in backdrop].
main reason this hearing is of interesting to me is pure lookie-loo-ing. IF the hearing takes place and IF he shows up, it will be the first chance to get a look at mark means since he raised all this drama about lori allegedly calling the church. since then he's been fundamentally spanked in the responses by both state and church, and the last thing he filed was . . . bizarre. since then he's put nothing new on the official record, and he hasn't filed any response to this motion to quash. i'm very curious to know how or even whether he'll defend this demand for information about chad's church-related history.
flaired as speculation. so have at it. is anyone planning to watch? i believe the 28th is tuesday and i will not have to work so i sure have my calendar set \o/ edited: it's actually 10am on the 29th, so i can't.
When heโs fired up, the whole team is fired up. I love him. Who Dat!
What the hell is this?
