He knew kids were dying and didn’t care n even encouraged “the wild ones” to sneak in and cause mayhem.
https://www.newsweek.com/alec-baldwin-could-charged-negligent-homicide-rust-shooting-nancy-grace-1643361
*I sourced these from differing law websites; I am not a legal professional
Negligent Homicide
Unlike other forms of homicide, negligent homicide can be a bit more complicated due to the large gray area for what can be considered negligent action and therefore more difficult to understand. While negligent homicide is the form of homicide that carries the lowest gravity, the criminal consequences associated with it can include two years in prison and fines up to $10,000.
Involuntary Manslaughter
Involuntary manslaughter is defined as an unintentional killing that results either from recklessness or criminal negligence or from the commission of a low-level criminal act such as a misdemeanor.
Involuntary manslaughter is distinguished from other forms of homicide because it does not require deliberation or premeditation, or even intent.
Since these mental states are not required, involuntary manslaughter is the lowest category of homicide.
The first type of involuntary manslaughter occurs when a defendant recklessly or negligently commits an act that results in the death of another person.
Recklessness usually means that the defendant was aware of the risk that they were creating, while negligence usually means that the defendant was not aware of the risk but reasonably should have been aware of it.
The level of negligence required for involuntary manslaughter is higher than normal civil negligence and requires that the defendant have acted in a very unreasonable manner.
The exact language used to describe this negligence standard varies by state, but many refer to it as “criminal negligence” or “gross negligence.”
Many states do not define involuntary manslaughter, or define it vaguely in common-law terms.
Some jurisdictions describe the amount of NEGLIGENCE necessary to constitute manslaughter with terms such as criminal negligence, gross negligence, and culpable negligence.
The only certainty that can be attached to these terms is that they require more than the ordinary negligence standard in a civil case.
With this approach the state does not have to prove that the defendant was aware of the risk.
Wanton Disregard
Wanton disregard is a legal term that denotes an individual's extreme lack of care for the well-being or rights of another individual. Wanton disregard is a serious accusation that indicates that a person behaved extremely recklessly and is most commonly used in an insurance context, where it refers to neg
... keep reading on reddit ➡Saw this in an AMA by an Australian nurse, somebody asked about the treatment protocol for covid:
>Oxygen therapy, dexamethasone and proning. If they meet the criteria Remdesivir, baricitinib and last resort tocilizumab.
If that's representative of all hospitals in this country, good luck to anybody being admitted the odds aren't on your side:
Remdesivir:
>Dr. Bryan Ardis makes an astounding revelation. He states that Dr. Fauci pushed the use of Veklury® (remdesivir) as a treatment for COVID-19 knowing that it would be unsafe and ineffective for patients.
>
>"Remdesivir was the only treatment to be used in hospitals....it was never FDA approved to be safe efficacious for any disease but on the NIH's website Anthony Fauci said every doctor in the country has to use Remdesivir only and there's these two research studies that prove Remdesivir is efficacious and warranted...the first study quoted on the website was the Ebola trials on 4 experimental drugs in 2018 and then there was a second study which was a study, it's called a cohort study which was actually sponsored by Gilead, the manufacturer of Remdesivir in March 2020 and they had 53 covid-19 patients from three countries- Japan, Canada and America, that they gave Remdesivir for 28 days.
>
>*Now, there were two links on the NIG website that Fauci was quoting.... When I clicked the link- anybody can go to it now- in that study there was four drugs- Remdesivir and NIH experimental drug that Fauci put in and then two other experimental antibodies. In the study, at 6 months of this one year study, the safety board for the study found that Remdesivir had the highest death rate of all four experimental drugs and pulled the drug from the study. It didn't even make it to the end of the study because it was so deadly. They also pulled Anthony Fauci's experimental drug he put in the trial because it was the second most deadly...well the second study he quoted on NIH's website which was the cohort study by Gilead,it actually published it's findings within 28 days of giving these 53 covid patients from three countries that figured out what the side effects were- 22% experienced these four lethal side effects- multiple organ failure, acute kidney failure, septic shock and hypotension, 8% had to be taken off the drug on day five or ten because they
Our government agencies along with the pharmaceutical companies know of all the deaths on VAERS and a million and a half horrific injuries, but keep maintaining those claims haven't been 'verified' by way of autopsies, yet they refuse to permit the autopsies even when doctors request them. This is negligent homicide: https://www.karenalexanderlaw.com/criminal-defense/articles/elements-of-negligent-homicide and those within our system standing in the way of these investigations need to be criminally charged. I have no doubt there are further felony charges that can be brought against them for the one million and a half horrendous injuries caused by the vaccine and pretending they don't even EXIST.
Our government along with the pharmaceutical companies know of all the deaths on VAERS and a million and a half horrific injuries, but keep maintaining those claims haven't been 'verified' by way of autopsies, yet they refuse to permit the autopsies even when doctors request them. This is negligent homicide: https://www.karenalexanderlaw.com/criminal-defense/articles/elements-of-negligent-homicide and those within our system standing in the way of these investigations need to be criminally charged. I have no doubt there are further felony charges that can be brought against them for the one million and a half horrendous injuries caused by the vaccine and pretending they don't even EXIST.
Our government agencies along with the pharmaceutical companies know of all the deaths on VAERS and a million and a half horrific injuries, but keep maintaining those claims haven't been 'verified' by way of autopsies, yet they refuse to permit the autopsies even when doctors request them. This is negligent homicide: https://www.karenalexanderlaw.com/criminal-defense/articles/elements-of-negligent-homicide and those within our system standing in the way of these investigations need to be criminally charged. I have no doubt there are further felony charges that can be brought against them for the one million and a half horrendous injuries caused by the vaccine and pretending they don't even EXIST.
