Hall of Egress is one of my favorite episodes. And I feel like it's trying to share a message, like most good AT episodes do. Dungeon Train is about coping using addictive games and habits. Breezy deals with unrequited love and finding hope and purpose. Little People, Don't Look, etc, etc. All dealing with complex issues of growth and understanding.
But I am struggling to find the meaning of Hall of Egress.
Which is all kinds of ironic considering the story.
"Every map I make is wrong. All the signs point to traps."
I feel like there's a lesson here that I just can't wrap my head around.
Any ideas?
I was in a very dark place feeling utterly isolated from everyone,
but my friends found out and put aside their very busy lives and sought me out
but now they are busy yet again -- and I know they love me and all that -- and I realize
if I want to stay out of the darkness and in the light, I need to do more "light-welcoming things".
So, I restrict my news consumption to once a week, I take long walks, and my friends and I have arranged to visit online every Wednesday evening.
So, I invite discussion of what else one might do to be a candle for oneself and for others in this time of ugly politics and of self-righteous plague carriers who are willing to spread potentially lethal disease rather than wear a mask.
Located in the Pacific Northwest.
We purchased our 1947 brick home last year knowing that a lot of the vinyl windows would need to be replaced in the near future. Shortly after moving in we noticed that the egress windows in the basement were leaking when it rained and was windy.
The windows are south facing and we get fairly strong (sometimes gusting at 20 knots or more) winds in the winter. During light wind and rain conditions there is no leaking. They appear to be leaking at the center (meeting rail? Style?) where the windows slide back and forth (they are sliding and not sash windows).
My question is, if I replace these with new and properly installed windows will the wind still cause water intrusion? Or do I need to seriously consider new window wells with covers? It is the front of our home and I would prefer not to have giant plastic well covers in the front, but if needs must I will install them.
Do I put in new windows and pray they don’t leak? Or do I just assume I need to budget for more than just replacement windows (i.e. new wells/covers).
Would having the windows recessed in the well stop the water coming in?
Are there egress storm windows I should be considering?
Looking for a long term solution.
My initial short-term solution was to try and create some sort of lip for the water to run away from the window and down, so I put a piece of flashing over the edge (I know this is not the proper way to install the flashing, but it was meant to be a quick fix) and this seemed to help...until winter arrived. In the meantime I have just fashioned some temporary lean-to type shutters to help shed the water away from the windows and house. They are made with 1x2 and plastic sheeting from Home Depot. They are held in place with the improperly used flashing and some bricks, so they can be pushed out of the way if someone needs to get out the window.
Photos:
Thanks for the help!
Have a customer with a small 3rd floor club, they've had entrance lever handles on the egress doors for about 10 years but now the fire inspector wants crash bars, makes sense. Commercial steel door and frame, I did some marks 9900 panic bars with cylindrical trims, looks good, but a big problem is that the contractor did a piss poor job installing the steel frames and they have like 1/2 inch of lateral play, maybe more if you pull hard enough! I have never run into this. They store liquor in there so the doors have to be secure, low crime area and this is within a secure building but still, I dont like it! Spacered the strikes as much as possible, I couldnt pull the latch past the strike but 2 people might be able to.
So heres my question: My fire code book says that for auditoriums, "A" group(its just a big open dance floor with a bar on one side), occupancy of 300 or less, you can install a key operated lock on egress side as long as you have a sign next to it stating doors must be unlocked when room is occupied, signage format was very specific. Feels so wrong but apparently I can install a double deadbolt on a panic bar door? Have you done this? I feel like this is one of those things you could do but shouldnt.
So in short, I am trying to set up something where there is a "compute" instance(some variety of C or M instance, basically whatever is cheapest as a spot instance at the moment) that accesses my t4g instance that runs all the time via sshfs/SFTP for storage. My question is, will AWS route my data in a way where it doesn't leave the region if I just refer to the t4g instance by its forward facing IP? This would generally make my life easier but I'm wondering if i'll end up with a giant egress bill for it.
We have a mezzanine and my facility that we are going to use as a training area. There is only one staircase that leads in and out of this place and there is no other way in and out. Only 12 people will be up there max. Are there regs that require me to have more than one means of egress? Michigan
Pretty interesting stats from tweetstorm out of Shopify's Engineering twitter.
I'm a new-comer DE, any idea how they were able to achieve this?
I've tested downloading 20GB of data to my PC from GCE VM using a webserver (nginx).
However in the "Billing" section, it's not counted and there's no track record that I use their resources. So the cost is $0 USD.
I don't want to be trapped after the trial ends like paying excessive amount of dollars, because Google doesn't give me how much I should have to pay each month during the free trial.
**UPDATE**
I just found out that apparently the Billing > Reports > "Promotions & others" checkbox must be unticked, so it can reveal the real usage cost.
SOLD SOLD SOLD
This handlebar set up is in excellent condition. Used to test on a few day rides. Never on trip. No flaws. Includes the following:
- Revelate Egress Pocket
- Salsa EXP 15 liter Dry Bag
- Revelate Designs Mountain Feedbag
- Surly Tool Pouch
- Revelate Designs Extension Straps
Hi! I hope this is an ok place to post this, if not directing me to a better sub would be great!
I have a 28 acre parcel that has a road running through the middle of it. That road leads to my house, and then continues on to my neighbor's home. It then turns, crosses entirely into that neighbors land and connects back to a different road. I am Parcel 2 and neighbor is Parcel 1. In 2013, before either of us owned these parcels, a Shared Roadway agreement was written that said the owner of Parcel 1 granted an easement for ingress and egress TO the owners of Parcel 2. That easement in question is entirely in the boundary of Parcel 2 (I plotted it using Plat Plotter).
How can a Parcel 1 owner grant an easement to a Parcel 2 owner when that easement lies within Parcel 2? Future recordings of Warranty Deeds make no reference to this easement, but do spell out easements for both of our uses of that back road. Parcel 1 owner seems uninterested in helping pay for maintenance which I am fine with, provided the easement isn't valid or no longer exists.
I'm going to have a title report prepared, but I wanted to get some input before doing so.
I was kinda pigeonholed into egress I'm not like mad about it, very neutral. Seems like a very niche okay job with no civilian marketability but a good job while active duty. What do you think the odds are that I could reclass though? 18 months in? Or even on a re-enlistment? I'd like to do cyber eventually or something that can transfer to civilian life.
I want to preface by saying this isn't my favorite episode of the show. It makes my top 5 list, but I doubt it's even in my top 3 if I had to rank them. It's a great episode and I know it's a favorite, which is why I'm posting to try and have some discussion.
TL;DR, Tell me your thoughts on the episode if you don't read the post, this is gonna be a long one
If you've seen the episode, you can skip to the second paragraph, the first one is just gonna be a general summary with a few notes as I go. The episode starts on a familiar scene of a wooded mountain, and moves in to Finn and Jake walking through the woods. Jake mentions the last time they were there, right after Finn and FP split up and Finn found the dungeon train, hence the familiarity. Finn mentions how the dungeon train was awesome, and Jake basically just tells him no. Then they find an entrance to a temple, using a map, and Finn goes in while Jake looks for chalk. The entrance gets sealed, and Finn decides he has to move onward to find the exit. He then decides to leave string from his shirt, so he could find his way back, "bread-crumb style", but he falls down a short bit which pulls the string with him. After he falls, he walks into a room with an upside-down stone snowman and a door that says 'Hall of Egress'. He remembers PB telling him that egress means exit, so he gets super excited and tries to leave. After many failed attempts to open the door, including smashing part of the snowman against it, he leans against it with his eyes closed, falling through it. He opens his eyes on the ground and finds himself facing the door, noticing that the snowman statue is back together. He notes that it's a magic door, then discovers with his eyes closed he can pass through it. He opens his eyes again, finding himself facing the door again, still in the same room. A second attempt leads him to realize there's a maze on the other side, and he tries to navigate it after finding an errant thread, "bread-crumb style." The thread, however, leads him to a spike trap and he opens his eyes to go back to the original room. He starts to make a map, but immediately discovers it's wrong due to a left that ended up a wall. He finds exit signs, but they lead to traps as well, causing him to sit and rethink the maze for a while. He mentions a few other things to himself that aren't shown onscreen, and then he decides to just close his eyes and run without any strategy. This strategy, or lack thereof, works perfe
... keep reading on reddit ➡I've looked through docs briefly and couldn't find it anywhere.
Does it allow controlling egress traffic (pod -> external world, not just pod -> pod)?
I am under contract to purchase a property that is only accessible by crossing two other properties.. There is a trail that crosses the two properties that are owned by two different people. The 2nd owner has a gate. After this gate the trail splits into two with one trail leading to my potential property so apparently a previous owner used this trail before.
I have tried to make contact with the owner of the gate to ask for permission, but have yet to receive a response. The property broker mentioned the possibility of egress and regress applying to this situation, but he couldn't explain much about it. Does this mean I would possibly have a legal right to use this trail to access my property?
So I was just watching this episode again for the millionth time and, in all the times I’ve rewatched the season I always wondered what the hidden meaning of this episode is. It’s a super interesting episode and I want to know everyone’s take on it!
The best games are when you think all hope is lost but somehow your fourtunes turn around and you make it out alive. The year is 2381 and I'm still fighting this long war where a driven assimilator who conquered half the galaxy declared war on my comparatively feeble federation. Luckily I had started fortifying some systems in anticipation of a war with Aeternum, my relatively small combined fleets of 1.3 million was able to push back the tide and after some gains in the 2360s the Homolog was able to rebuild the fleet and by 2370 I'd lost most of my gains and even more.
This desperate war is back and forth and is the sort of thing I live for. My problem is that I have only 3 fleets strong enough to fight theirs and I'm playing whack a mole, I can gain local superiority but there are too many fronts. I've just researched attack moons and I'm restoring two that have been left in my sytsems, these attack moons are the hope of my people. Perhaps I can form a 4th fleet around these moons to get some breathing space . I'm also trying to delay Aeternum's awakening as much as possible during all this. The free biological people's of the galaxy will prevail!
For mod info I'm using Starnet AI on admiral, Gigastructures, NSC2 with +50% AI resources. A bunch of other smaller mods.
See the imgur album below for some beautiful screenshots:
So, Java 8u191 onwards is less bad when it comes to the Log4Shell log4j vulnerability. Here are the test results having scanned through network egress controls:
https://chasersystems.com/discrimiNAT/blog/log4shell-and-its-traces-in-a-network-egress-filter/
Hi all, just worked with some terraform code very briefly and have some questions. My first one is: where is the best resource for understanding what happens between terraform and aws? Like the exact mechanism? I have really tried to google and answer my own questions but I feel like I haven't found anything very clear.
My first question is about egress_rules & ingress_rules. In the code I was provided to look at and use, it had: egress_rules = ["all-all"] and same for ingress_rules. I have been trying to figure out what that "all-all" refers to. Ports and protocols? Ports in and ports out? My friend shared with me this code he found:
ingress_rules = ["https-443-tcp", "http-80-tcp", "ssh", "all-icmp"]
so protocol-port-tcp/udp? if anyone has any insight or place to find answers, let me know.
My second question is about key pair creation. In our school example we created a public key and put it in the resource = "aws_key_pair" block. Later we used that public key to SSH into the AWS instance. But according to this AWS site and also my experience in the AWS console, the public key should be created and stored on the instance, and a private key (a .pem file) should be generated and stored on your end. So what is happening with the aws_key_pair resource, and why does SSH-ing in with a public key work?
Appreciate your patience with a total newbie. I'm really interested in this stuff and have tried to find answers on my own.
I have multi-node public clusters in GKE and EKS. The services make a request to a third party so we have to give them the IPs of the nodes to whitelist. But if a node restarts or a new one is created, it's external IP is different. I tried to use a NAT Gateway in GKE but was unable to do so. I also found a tool called KubeIP but it's only for GKE. Is there a way to do this in the major providers (GKE, EKS, and maybe AKS)?
I basically want the external IP of the nodes in a public cluster to always be within a specific IP range
