There are numerous scientific studies done where normal people lied to psychiatrists and were diagnosed with serious mental disorders. This proves that psychiatrists can’t tell the difference between someone that does and does not have a serious mental health disorder. Strapping people to beds and holding them down to forcefully inject them with dopamine antagonists is essentially torture and should not be a legal medical practice. There are better ways to keep people from hurting themselves and others. If a normal person experiences psychosis and can heal from it they are given no chance to heal in today’s hospitals. Medications especially dopamine antagonists maim people and their ability to live a happy life. I firmly believe they are proven to reduce overall brain mass despite the claims by big pharma that it is likely mental illness causing brains to shrink. They also cause serious fertility and sexual side effects and the people who are forced to take them are expected to not worry about it. Weight gain and hunger is also a serious side effect that these people are often told is their own fault. Better more moral solutions to medication non-adherence is jail sentences and/or treatment where people are not forced to take medications. There are many other commonly prescribed mental health medications besides dopamine antagonists that cause serious long term problems. For instance, there is a strong link between the use of antidepressants and violence.
Psychiatrists have no truly scientific definitions of mental illnesses and believing in their practice is along the lines of believing in a religion or a conspiracy theory. One of the most commonly diagnosed mental illnesses throughout history, hysteria, isn’t even a diagnosis anymore. The astonishing word play in the practice of psychiatry is obviously designed to strip patients of credibility and assume infallibility of treatment methods while ignoring the fallibility of the doctors.
People’s bodies should be left alone by doctors if patients don’t accept their treatment. For a very long time people with dementia and Alzheimers where forced to take antipsychotics that killed many of them. This death toll and complication is ignored by psychiatrists treating younger patients who fail to see the fallibility of what they call a “science”.
Edit: I think a lot of people are misunderstanding my title which is understandable. What I don’t think should be legal is the forced administra
... keep reading on reddit ➡All over Facebook I'm seeing breeders freak out about government forced sterilization. I'm curious about my childfree community's opinion on the matter.
If we begin with the understanding that compulsory sterilization is a crime against humanity, we can extrapolate motives for this crime through rational choice theory.
I have hypothesized three potential motives for compulsory sterilization and contraception in mass detention facilities:
-
Systematic neglect - Providers over-prescribe sterilization procedures and contraception in an effort to stem demand for routine care.
-
Systematic sexual violence - Providers employ sterilization and contraception in order to facilitate systematic rape.
-
Eugenics - Providers are compelled by population planning and genocide.
Which hypothesis is most sound? Are there other potential motives I may have overlooked? What are your thoughts?
i was thinking how much better will a system were you actually had to pay something to have a child not much but enough to make you think about it long and hard before you just poop someone out
one problem people will probably still have children and give some stupid reason why, so what i was thinking was if we had a compulsory sterilization thing to make sure you can't that way people are not having children willy nilly and were can finally stop the abortion problem because if you fall pregnant you did that knowing full well what the fuck you where doing and you cannot blame anyone but yourself
Imagine first what a [SERIOUS] tag on this sub would mean, and then imagine that this has one.
I intend no flaming, controversy or trolling from this. I want to know more about something that did not occur in a vacuum.
Now, as to the question:
It seems to me that those sterilization laws fell into disfavor rather definitively when their logical end was made manifest in Hitler's Germany. I could be wrong about that, as I haven't done even more homework. But I was surprised to learn today that the origins of ideas about racial purity did not originate with The Nazis, but were a shared pool of the investigations and pronouncements of worldwide academia, and that the US had created what became a model law that the Germans government emulated in 1933.
Is that conversation over, or was it simply put on hold? Did the US and other countries abandon eugenics and sterilization after WWII? If so, was it because of Hitler's pogroms? Was the body of those beliefs held accountable in any way for the development of Nazi policies?
If we begin with the understanding that compulsory sterilization is a crime against humanity, we can extrapolate motives for this crime through rational choice theory.
I have hypothesized three potential motives for compulsory sterilization and contraception in mass detention facilities:
-
Systematic neglect - Providers over-prescribe sterilization procedures and contraception in an effort to stem demand for routine care.
-
Systematic sexual violence - Providers employ sterilization and contraception in order to facilitate systematic rape.
-
Eugenics - Providers are compelled by population planning and genocide.
Which hypothesis is most sound? Are there other potential motives I may have overlooked? What are your thoughts?
