I've got lots of Disney 4K not currently on Disney+. Tons of other titles below, too.
Certain HD iTunes codes should port to 4K and are marked accordingly, but are not guaranteed.
Check 4K Sheet to be sure.
PayPal F&F preferred. Codes are checked before posting and double-checked before sending.
SPECIALS
- X-MEN ORIGINAL TRILOGY 4K (MA, VUDU) $20 (X-MEN, X2, X3)
- JACK RYAN 5-FILM COLLECTION 4K (iTunes, VUDU) $25
- FAST & FURIOUS 1-6 HD (MA, VUDU, iTunes) $25
- MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE 1-6 HD (iTunes [Should Port to 4K], Vudu) $30
MOVIES
PRIORITY TITLES/4K TITLES
ALIEN (1979) 4K (MA, VUDU, iTunes) $7
ANT-MAN AND THE WASP 4K (MA, VUDU) HD (iTunes, GP) $7 SOLD
AVENGERS: ENDGAME 4K (MA, VUDU) HD (iTunes, GP) $7
AVENGERS: INFINITY WAR 4K (MA, VUDU) HD (iTunes, GP) $7
BAD TIMES AT THE EL ROYALE 4K (MA, VUDU) $7
BLADE RUNNER 2049 HD (MA, VUDU) $5
THE BOURNE IDENTITY 4K (iTunes) $7
THE BOURNE ULTIMATUM 4K (MA, VUDU, iTunes) $7
CAPTAIN MARVEL 4K (MA, VUDU) HD (iTunes, GP) $7
COCO 4K (MA, VUDU) HD (iTunes, GP) $7
DEADPOOL 2 4K (MA, VUDU, GP [GooglePlay does not redeem 4K]) $7
THE FAST AND THE FURIOUS 4K (MA, VUDU) $7
THE FATE OF THE FURIOUS (THEATRICAL) 4K (MA, VUDU, iTunes) $7
THE FATE OF THE FURIOUS (EXTENDED DIRECTOR’S CUT) 4K (MA, VUDU) $7
FIELD OF DREAMS 4K (MA, VUDU) $7
FIRST MAN 4K (MA, VUDU) $7
THE GRINCH (2018) HD (MA, VUDU) $5
JUSTICE LEAGUE 4K (MA, VUDU) $7
JUSTICE LEAGUE HD (MA, VUDU) $5
MARY POPPINS RETURNS 4K (MA, VUDU) HD (iTunes, GP) $7
MAZE RUNNER: THE DEATH CURE HD (MA, VUDU) $5
MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE: ROGUE NATION 4K (iTunes, VUDU) $7
THE NUTCRACKER AND THE FOUR REALMS 4K (MA, VUDU) HD (iTunes, GP) $7
PACIFIC RIM UPRISING 4K (MA, VUDU) $7
PET SEMATARY (2019) 4K (iTunes, VUDU) $7
PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES 4K (MA, VUDU) HD (iTunes, GP) $7
RALPH BREAKS THE INTERNET 4K (MA, VUDU) HD (iTunes, GP) $7
SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY 4K (MA, VUDU) HD (iTunes, GP) $7 SOLD
SPIDER-MAN: HOMECOMING HD (MA, VUDU) $5
STAR TREK (2009) HD (VUDU) $5
~~STAR WARS: THE LAST
... keep reading on reddit ➡Watch Pet Sematary official trailer:
Pet Sematary is a 2019 American supernatural horror film directed by Kevin Kölsch and Dennis Widmyer.
Starring Jason Clarke, Amy Seimetz, John Lithgow, Jeté Laurence, Sonia Maria Chirila, Lucas Lavoie, Obssa Ahmed, Alyssa Brooke Levine, Maria Herrera, Jacob Lemieux and others.
#PetSematary, #KevinKolsch, #DennisWidmyer, #JasonClarke, #AmySeimetz, #JohnLithgow, #JeteLaurence, #SoniaMariaChirila, #LucasLavoie, #ObssaAhmed, #AlyssaBrookeLevine, #MariaHerrera, #JacobLemieux, #MaverickFortin, #HugoLavoie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jn7g75NOGrQ&list=PLfpwAx09K77mHmBBErhFXwkijN2gXdan7
I just finished creating a series of videos looking at how the 2019 Pet Sematary is a better film than a lot of folk give it credit for. I basically felt reviewers gave it a really hard time, and missed a lot of what made it a really great horror film. I'd love to hear people's thoughts as I'm really new to making videos, but I love horror and want to make more of these long-form horror movie reviews.
All feedback welcome - especially whether or not you agree with me on Pet Sematary!
I thought the movie was really good. Sure it deviates from the book a bit and is kinda short, but for what it was I actually quite liked it.
I liked how they have some time with post resurrection Ellie and Louis, giving her descent into evil a little more time as she came into bearings after being dead. Like it wasn’t just that something evil was in her, but like a descent into madness after everything she went through that let it take over.
I also liked they included the wendigo because it’s one of my favorite mythological monsters.
I kinda thought that it ended on a much bleaker note than the book, as the now resurrected Louis looks into the car at Gage. Making it so that they all died, and not just Ellie and Rachel.
My one gripe is that it needed about 30 more minutes to really flesh out the suspense and character building. If it were adapted into a miniseries of like 5 one hour episodes and kept the changes they made to the book I think it would have been fantastic.
What do y’all think?
Hunger Games (Vudu.)
Hunger Games (Itunes) X2
Twilight Breaking Dawn PT2 (Vudu.)
Fast and Furious 6 (MA.)
Insurgent (Vudu.)
Pet Sematary 2019 (Vudu.) (HD)
Mission Impossible (Vudu.) (HD.)
Mission Impossible 3 (HD) (Vudu.)
Mission Impossible Ghost Protocol (HD) (Vudu.)
Mission Impossible Rouge Nation (HD) (Vudu.)
Rocketman (HD) (Vudu.)
The mission Impossible films are redeemed through paramountmovies.com which gives you the choice of ITunes,Vudu or Fandango now
I’ll try my best to respond to everyone but if I don’t it means I’m not interested.
Especially interested in any James Bond movie that isn’t Spectre of Skyfall.
I will send Itunes first because I can’t confirm it works.
ISO list
https://www.reddit.com/user/EthanGr20/comments/eudtzf/permanent_iso_list/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
Hi there, so I read the book today and promptly proceeded to watch the 2019 film adaptation. How did you guys feel about the movie? The ending was sure alternative huh? I was not expecting that but it seemed quite an interesting ending nonetheless.
I'm sure this adaptation is just another name on the long list of movies Del Toro wants to make, but never will make, but I can't help but get excited thinking about what he could do with the novel. The original flick was well intentioned by hampered by some really bad acting and cutting out of a lot of the most horrifying parts of the novel. The newer adaptation is a hot mess with no real redeeming value.
If Del Torro went all in, gave us a scary Gage, gave us the Wendigo, gave us that overwhelming sense of dread and grief... Just thinking about the possibility gives me goosebumps. Sort of like those loons down by Prospect...
I’ve just finished reading Pet Sematary, and I really want to watch the film however I am unsure whether to watch the 1989 original, or the 2019 remake. I am not a huge fan of major jump scares or anything that would be visually terrifying to watch (so I am unsure why I am even considering a film) but the book has stuck with me so much I just want to watch it play out on screen.
I know there are differences between the two films, but was hoping someone can give me some answers! Thanks!
I needed a few moments to gather my thoughts after I set this book down. I have just turned the last page, and I can already feel Stephen King's prose haunting at me and taking root.
Spoilers below.
Stephen King's strong point was never in his endings. However, that is not true for this novel. There is something so incredibly masterful about Pet Sematary: it builds and builds and builds at that grief and at that fear.
What is experienced with this novel was a peculiar kind of horror. Not horror at gore, at spooky things that hide in the woods (though these spooky wood creatures are present), but at something that is instead so human and relatable.
What Stephen King showed me here is the horror of love. Love, present in Louis's every thought and action. Even in his resentment there is a deep love. For Rachel, for his children, for stupid little cat Winston Churchill. Then he showed us the capacity of that love, the depths it dragged Louis down to. The worst part is that now we have seen the depth of Louis's love, and instead of anger at his actions, we just feel a tragic understanding.
There was no way, once he had been introduced to the true power of the Pet Sematary, that Louis would not have done what he did. There was no world where he would not have made that first perilous and horrible journey to bury cat, and then the even worse one to bury Gage. There is also no worlds where he would not have done the same with Rachel's body, and waited patiently for her to return.
The thing about Louis's love is that it is desperate. It makes excuses. It clings, and it clings so hard that there is no choice but to climb that downfall with a corpse in his arms.
Bravo, King. King and death go hand in hand- the thoughts he has surrounding it, the conclusions he comes to. Pet Sematary, I believe, is King's thesis on death, love, and grief.
Slow clap
I'm just sitting here both upset and a bit... Tired. So bleak. I never thought it would be bleaker than revival, but I now fully believe that this should be listed as his best work.
I'm off to try and read Salem's Lot now, and imagining a world where Rachel had turned the car over the Jerusalem's Lot instead.
I just finished pet sematary and that ending was fucking chilling. Like Jesus Christ man.
It was the mid-80s and I was a junior in HS and a huge Stephen King fan. One day, I just fell terribly ill and things just got progressively worse from there. After a couple days of being really, really sick, my parents took me to the hospital, where I was quickly admitted and examined.
The doctors who were examining me happened to be from another country, and were speaking to each other in a foreign language, so I had no idea what was being said until I heard two words of English: “spinal meningitis”.
My parents showed no recognition, but I had read Pet Sematary. I knew nothing about the disease except how terrible King made it sound when describing Rachel’s sister. So I immediately panicked and told my mom that I was going to die, because I had a sickness I’d read about in a Stephen King book, and it was BAD. She tried to calm me down by pointing out that his books were fiction, but I explained that it wasn’t like some supernatural fictional situation in the book. It wasn’t even a main character in the book. It was a traumatic story about a relative whose sickness was so bad it disturbed the main character for life.
Suddenly, my mom got the point and went into panic mode, babbling to the doctors about Stephen King and pet cemeteries…the doctors thought she was a complete lunatic. 🤣🤣
Spoiler alert: I lived, and while it definitely wasn’t fun, it wasn’t quite as bad an experience as Mr King made it sound. I’m just glad the movie hadn’t come out yet at the time, or I’d have been even more freaked out.
Hi all, just joined this page so I hope I’m bringing a fresh theory to the table. I literally just thought of this as my fiancé and I were discussing book to movie adaptations.
My theory is that Jud is the bad guy. He’s portrayed as the helpful old neighbor next door, but let’s be honest here: he knew exactly what can of worms he was opening when he told Louis what to do with Church. He had seen what happened when things were buried at the burial ground. He knew what terrible things could come from it, and he suggested it anyway. Over a dead cat. I think Jud was some sort of protector of the burial grounds, placed there to ensure that the burial ground continued to get fresh bodies.
Specifically with Rachel - do you think Louis was right in assuming he waited too long with Gage? Do you think Rachel came back pretty much herself, or do you think she was "wrong"?
I completed the book recently.Then I watched the original movie. I thought the orginal sucked. Imo the acting was terrible there.They tried to copy the novel and as it was a movie ,a few important parts also had to be cut. The special effects didn't age well. From the reviews the new movie got ,I thought it was even worse than the original and wasn't gonna check it out.But am glad I saw it. In the new one ,I loved the fact that they tried different things as a straight adaptation of a book rarely results well on screen. The last few scenes were pretty good and the I thought the death of Ellie was much better and emotional than the orginal. A lot of people are fans of the orginal but I thought the new one was much better.
And what a roller coaster. I’ve seen the 80’s version a few times, so I new most of the big beats going in, but you know how things change when they get adapted (or are buried in tainted land). I was fascinated by the descriptions of the pets not being quite right after they came back, and how Judd’s parents immediately knew what he had done.
I’d have liked to get a historical story of someone else being brought back, as a lead in to the direct experience Judd shared.
I know some people hate ambiguity, but I loved not knowing caused Victors spirit to be bound to Lewis and Ellie. Or how he had knowledge of the burial ground and how it would twist what it brought back.
I also feel the book ending is better than either of the movies. The cliff hanger just hits better than seeing Rachel with the knife, or the zombie family.
I know the new one is very hit or miss, I thought it was ok but haven't seen the original in a while. I remember the changes they made but don't fully remember which one I would consider "scarier". My girlfriend hasn't seen either so I was wondering which to show her first? The original or the newer? I know it's very subjective, but just wanted to get some fellow horror fans thoughts?
I've just finished chapter 39 of Pet Sematary on my fourth or fifth read through (this time listening to Michael C. Hall's excellent narration on Audible -- highly recommended, btw). This edition includes a foreword by Stephen King wherein he states that Pet Sematary is, in his opinion, the scariest and most disturbing thing he's ever written. I agree, having read a lot of King's work. It's my favorite work of his, with The Shining and The Dark Tower saga coming close behind.
There are plenty of deeply scary and disturbing elements to this story. I grew up watching the 1989 film, and while it's far from perfect, the Zelda scenes terrified my brother and I when we were kids, and Victor Pascow's portrayal was plenty unsettling as well. Fred Gwynne is fantastic as always, and he's pitch perfect as Jud Crandall (and the reason I'll always love this movie). Unfortunately, the film doesn't do justice to the Timmy Baderman story.
Chapter 39 of Pet Sematary is a master class in horror, and it might be the scariest piece of an extremely disturbing novel. If you haven't read it, I encourage you to do so. The book is excellent.
So you can imagine my bafflement when the only acknowledgement that the 2019 film offers of Timmy Baderman is a headline on a piece of newspaper that Louis Creed passes over. While it fails in some departments (the aggressive portrayal of Pascow has nothing on 1989's creepy but sympathetic take on him), the new film did a couple things really well (the actress who played Rachel relating her story of Zelda stands out), and I would have loved to see this material covered. Overall I think this is a poor adaptation as it really falls apart with logistical impossibilities toward the end.
Did they just cut the Baderman story for time? I genuinely don't understand how they could've omitted this piece of the story. It's a crucial element in Jud's doomed attempt to dissuade Louis from returning to the Micmac burying ground, and it's a hell of a compelling argument. Anyone with any sense would steer clear of the place after hearing this account, and the fact that Louis proceeds regardless really hammers home how devastated and affected he is by Gage's death.
I'm astonished by this omission. Does anyone else have oversights like this to share regarding horror adaptations? Spoiler warnings, please!
Does it repair the dead who are buried there?
I ask primarily because of Gage and the manner of his death. The kiddo was hit by a semi and then dragged for 100ft. Realistically he'd be nothing but meat and a streak of gore, yet he comes back whole when buried.
I know the book mentions "There was nothing that could have been done for Gage even if Louis and Rachel did believe in dressing up their dead like mannequins and caking them in powder and makeup," and his casket is closed.
But realistically he'd be destroyed, as much a terrible death as that is for the little guy, I'd imagine he was mostly...meat...sealed in a leak proof bag (I've studied mortuary stuff in my spare time).
King doesn't shy away from Louis knowing what death does when he fears Pascow came back again, fearing he'd see an even more rotted and distorted corpse, so why would he think Gage would be whole enough to revive?
Did the Wendigo plant the idea and then repair Gage's body to use as a vessel?
Imo, Ari Aster should've directed the Pet Sematary remake. After seeing "Hereditary" I think he would've done the movie justice and gave us a movie adaptation so much closer to the novels' tone and subject matter.
I had a huge reading block for years before I picked up Pet Sematary and read it in one day without being able to put it down. It was the first Stephen King book I had read so I figured I’d read another of his after. I started IT but I wasn’t a fan. I actually really don’t like horror, and IT was too scary for me. I don’t know why Pet Sematary didn’t scare me. But I would like something similar in terms of writing style and how well it flowed that I got so sucked in. My all time favourite author is Haruki Murakami. I quite liked the often mundaneness of Pet Sematary. Maybe there’s another King novel similar to Pet Sematary in terms of style and lowkey horror? I’m currently reading The Power of the Dog and enjoying it, but not anywhere near how much I enjoyed Pet Sematary. I am welcome to any authors!
Does anyone have a pet sematary fanedit? someone posted an extended version of the movie here on this subreditt but deleted the account and now the link is no longer available.
)