This market isn't running on randomness.
It's not a bunch of people randomly throwing darts to decide on trades.
In fact, for the most part, it's not even people.
It's estimated that 70-86% of the trading volume is actually done by bots.
https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2019/08/21/research-crypto-trading-bots/
How do bots work?
They do a lot more than set buy and sell limits, They actually do the analysis of the market data for you.
They do the job of a quantitative analyst. Those mathematicians on Wall Street who figure out how to analyze market data, use statistical analysis to evaluate risk/reward, and crunch that into a trading strategy.
There are also bots there just to influence the market. Sometimes created by traders. It's also suspected that many of the major exchanges use bots on their trading platform. And they are nudging the market and volume as well.
And yes, these bots all take into account support, moving averages, trends, and all that technical analysis that people assume is just astrology.
Call it self-fulfilling, but that's how the majority of the market is trading right now.
Who are these bots?
There's many popular bots for top exchanges like Pionex, Cryptohopper, Trality, Conirule, etc...
Anyone can create a bot. And if you have the money, you can get some really bright people to customize one for you. Whether you're a whale or an exchange.
But the important thing to understand is that there is a pecking order. People with money can potentially prey on the market and on weaker bots, with a more complex bot.
The Whales.
The whales have two advantages. Despite much higher market caps, the current trading volume still gives whales a big advantage at pushing the market.
On top of that, they likely trade with the better trading bots to begin with. And probably use a more Machiavellish approach. When you're at the top of the food chain, Machiavelism seems to be often the best approach to protect your power.
Keep in mind that since 2017, we've had CME futures, and a lot of different ways that traders can short the market.
Whales are no exception.
Why only wait to go up to make money, when you can make money in both directions? Cryp
... keep reading on reddit ➡Or does it give a vibe of a spazzy white belt thinking too far ahead?
I actually do not care much about stripes now, busier with the choke around my neck - but I see so many different ways here in different schools that it strikes me as a legit question.
Is it attendance, do I need to bring cookies, get dry cleaning? Pay for a private, get an online certification - so many things I have seen here...
https://twitter.com/gabriel_pogrund/status/1477578504380289024?s=21 Just absolutely despicable and dangerous, being trans is apparently "woke".
I ask this as it appears to me modern, American education has put more emphasis on the memory of facts, for an exam, than stoking dispositions to inquire about reality.
I’ve seen several posts asking how and if it’s okay to escape. Dear friends- your in a war that they call “love”. They are your enemy.
This little book saved me more than once from several narcs when I found out what they were. This is an ancient book on war strategy that applies to any enemy big or small. Follow this and it will improve your outcomes, I promise.
I’m sharing this because lots of posts on if you should tell nparent about your escape plan before leaving. No- they are your enemy that has infiltrated your mind, will and emotions to work against you. Keep your focus and deal with the uncomfortable built in impulses to do the opposite of this advice later.
You are fighting for your freedom. This is what I believe is necessary to do it successfully. I grabbed a summary from online. I encourage you to read the book.
Where he says “attack” switch that out for “escape” or appropriate action. Obviously I don’t mean physical harm.
I hope this helps at least one person. You can do this.
“All warfare is based on deception. Hence when able to attack we must seem unable. When using our forces we must seem inactive. When we are near we make the enemy believe we are far away. When far away we must make the enemy believe we are near.”
“Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak.”
“If he is superior in strength, evade him.”
“The general who loses a battle makes but few calculations beforehand.”
“There is no instance of a country having benefitted from prolonged warfare.”
“A wise general makes a point of foraging on the enemy. One cartload of the enemy's provisions is equivalent to twenty of one's own.”
“Supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting.”
“The worst strategy of all is to besiege walled cities.” Unmasking a narc is bad strategy. Play along.
“There are five essentials for victory: He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight. He will win who knows how to handle both superior and inferior forces. He will win who’s army is animated by the same spirit throughout all it’s ranks. He will win who, prepared himself, waits to take the enemy unprepared. He will win who has military capacity and is not interfered with by the sovereign.”
“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself, but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, y
... keep reading on reddit ➡Hi everyone 🙂
We have created a Design System which is already developed with plain HTML and CSS, without any dependency like Bootstrap, etc.
Now we realized we have some components that requires Javascript (like accordions, modals, etc), and we are wondering what is the best practice nowadays to achieve it.
10 years ago the solution would be a Jquery plugin, I guess. Maybe today the solution is not a library, but only a methodology in plain Javascript.
What's the solution in 2022? Thanks in advance.
Update: Web Components are not an option since our design system has 2 variants and one is made with Web Components.
This topic is about the second variant of our DS (plain HTML components).
Components are developed with plain html for those customers that need them to work even without JavaScript enabled. In public services it’s a requirement, and most of our customers are in this sector.
Mods, feel free to take this down if it's not appropriate.
Friend of mine doesn't have Reddit. It's a cute text based game that quizzes you on Scrum concepts and real Scrum situations. Let me know what you all think.
iOS: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/scrum-happens/id1572942251
Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ScrumFun
I make a point too people on both side of this debate that something that seems too be lacking is Empirical Evidence. Nothing stranger is seeing mainstream Economist admit things in economics 101 textbooks are wrong so casually. The head of the bank of England A few years said they the textbooks are wrong in regards too how money is printed. He said the Private Banks Create currency via EX NILLO and not the government themselves. I always find it strange on how confident and above it all "some people" talk about their chosen economic philosophy. I don't like hearing from Right wing Libertarians that they Admit the Austrian school is impossible too prove. And then I don't like hearing from Marxists that "Marxism in a methodology and not a science". I honestly haven no idea what stuff like that means. Marx called allot of his ideas "Theory's" we should be able too test these theories then. Yes I know much economics is more conceptual rather than quantitative, which makes it difficult too model and be a hard science. Let the hate come I don't mean no harm. Just an observation I commonly see from both sides.
Do you create a race/class/feat combo to do the thing you want to be good at and then create a character concept around that build? Do you come up with a concept for a character then try and make a build around the character?
What other strategies do you use for character creation!
I was watching Penguinz0's video on a Hobbit speedrun (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRYXf2OV3kA if you want to watch too) and in the video the runner up discovers a new trick called "Wiggle Clip" which inevitably allows the record holder to get even deeper in 1st place. Very cool and magnanimous, and basically expected of the community in my experience.
But it made me curious if there's ever been an instance where someone releases a record speedrun and the community behind it notices they do something weird or never-before-seen that changes other runners' approach. Either due to the original runner's ignorance or out of malice in wanting to keep the trick to themselves.
Sorry if this has been asked before, I tried searching but I may just be searching the wrong terms, etc.
This is a minimum list of references that you need to have and know. This is the basic reference list for a stress analyst.
"Strength of Materials, Vol I & II," Timoshenko
" Analysis and Design of Flight Vehicle Structures," Bruhn
"Strength of Materials," JP Den Hartog
"Advanced Strength of Materials," JP Den Hartog
"Aircraft Structures," Peery
"Airplane Structural Analysis," Sechler & Dunn
"Advanced Strength and Applied Elasticity," Ugural
"Theory of Elasticity," Timoshenko
"Theory of Plates and Shells," Timoshenko
"Theory of Elastic Stability," Timoshenko
Morning Everybody,
I spent the weekend digging for info on the fka lidar standards consortium. It doesn't seem like there is much out there at this time.
One thing that I did come across was an October paper titled Definition and Application of a Test Methodology for Lidar Sensors by Adrian Zlocki, the Head of Automated Driving at fka.
This paper is a very short work. It gives an overview of the state of the art, describes the need for coherent and unified testing to make valid comparisons of different technology, and then discusses what that testing would look like.
Much of what is included here could be gleaned from reading fka's website, though I can say that this paper reads somewhat like a project proposal or introduction to what the consortium will be focused on and how they may proceed.
The article does not name any names, and is certainly not a deep dive. It does mirror some of the language and tone that we have heard from Sumit with regard to testing and specs. I currently believe that Sumit's best in class and call outs for competitor specifications are about* to be validated.
*I'll leave about here in engineering time, as opposed to investor time, let alone trader time.
That said, given the announcements for new technology and vehicles coming from the auto makers, coupled with the length of their cycles, I would guess that the fka schedule here will not be leisurely, and that many of the OEMs and Tier 1s either involved or watching are already looking at who they think will emerge from this as viable candidates moving forward. Sumit mentioned 3-5 companies. I do not think that he's made very many sector predictions that have not later shown to be early sector insight. I see this consortium, perhaps naively, as a significant consolidation event.
Here are some extracts from the article:
>Due to their technical characteristics, lidar sensors offer high potential in the implementation of automated driving functions. fka is working on a general specification and a universal test methodology to ensure comparability of the different sensor approaches and to accelerate the market introduction of new lidar systems.
>Different technologies are available for automated driving following the main physical principles of optics, acoustics and wave propagation. These are implemented in automotive cameras, radar, ultrasonic and lidar sensors. Lidar (light detection and ranging) sensors use the reflection of transmitted laser beams (
... keep reading on reddit ➡
It may sound easy to build a portfolio, just pick a couple coins you like and think will do well right?
I'll show you a type of methodology (and there are more different methods that are valid too) , looking at the market and types of coins first, before looking at individual coins.
1-Know your objective
Before we start this methodology, first figure out in a little more detail, what your goal is, beyond just "more money".
It may sound obvious, but this is a crucial step that too many people skip.
What is your strategy gonna be?
Is it long term, short term, a hybrid?
Are you looking more for an investment or an income? Do you want to stake?
How much risk can you take? Do you want to play it more safe?
Really figure out what you want out of this, what you can realistically expect.
Then you will be halfway there.
2-Diversification
Some people may say that diversification is pointless, because everything follows Bitcoin.
But they are only half right.
First, not everything follows Bitcoin, and not to the same degree.
Second, diversification isn't just about price, it's also about utility.
Finally, the only reason everything follows Bitcoin, is because it's dominant. Do you know for sure that Bitcoin will remain dominant in 10 years?
3-The categories.
Before just jumping on coins your friend advised you to buy, think about what different type of coins are out there.
Your friend might just have given you only NFT related projects, or all layer 2s for Ethereum. Do you really want to be all in on one aspect of crypto?
A crypto may have amazing technology, but is there a demand for that utility?
Like starting a business, it's better to look at the market first.
This is what this methodology is about.
Different coins cater to different markets, and have their own special strength. Sometimes many strength, and overlap on different markets and multiple utilities.
-Store of value
-Governance token
-Payment
-Privacy
-Gen 3 chain
-Smart contract
-Interoperability
-Oracle
-Exchange token
-Layer 2
-Defi
-IOT
-Gamefi
-DAO
-Blockchain utility
-Business utility
-Database
-Computing power
-NFT
-Meme coin
-Stablecoin
You can condense those into payment, blockchain, store of value, privacy, and utility. And then split these into sub-categories you like.
4-Prioritize your categories.
By working through this methodology, you are doing something better than just going by "I heard this coin is pretty goo
... keep reading on reddit ➡Curious how this subreddit feels about this topic. What’s the best way to value a company and why do you feel that way?
Joe Biden Donald Trump Barack Obama
- Public Persuasion
40 40 50
- Crisis Leadership
60 20 60
- Economic Management
55 50 60
- Moral Authority
70 20 65
- International Relations
70 35 70
- Administrative Skills
65 40 40
- Relations with Congress
55 40 40
- Vision / Setting an Agenda
70 60 75
- Pursued Equal Justice For All
70 25 70
- Performance Within Context of Times
60 20 70
Total 615 350 600 *This is out of 1000
Total Amount of points in the survey N/A 312 664
My ranking 14 41 20
Original Ranking N/A 41 10
Final observations: While I think Biden's first term is a C tier, it is interesting that when I ranked him with this method I got him in 14 out of 44 presidents and was a head of former president such as James K. Polk who I think was a better president.
Link https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurvey2021/?page=overall
Working on my software PM resume and after viewing numerous samples on the internet, I'm a bit confused! I have a Scrum Master certificate and thought I have been operating under the Agile development methodology following Scrum framework.
I've seen resumes out there list:
- Agile/scrum methodology
- Agile/scrum framework
- Agile/waterfall methodology
- Agile development with scrum methodololgy
- Agile methodology with Scrum or Kanban framework
- Agile framework with Scrum principles
Which one is most accurate?
In dips, this subreddit often quotes the Fear & Greed Index. However, very few people actually comment on how it is constructed. Knowing how it is constructed can help in using it for investing/trading.
The fear and greed index is supposed to reflect the sentiment in the crypto market. Often, fear is considered a buy indicator, while greed is considered a sell indicator.
The index is constructed through an amalgamation of different factors:
- Volatility (25%) - Measures current volatility and compares it to recent average values. More volatility is often considered a sign of fear.
- Market Momentum/Volume (25%) - Consistently high volume shows that the market is volume (people want to trade/buy more)
- Social Media (15%) - Using sentiment analysis to judge how bullish/bearish the market is.
- Surveys (15%) - Using large polls to judge sentiment. Currently not in use.
- Dominance (10%) - Dominance is the % of market cap a coin has, normally measured by Bitcoin. As Bitcoin increases in market cap, it is often a bearish signal, as people flee from altcoins to a less volatile coin.
- Trends (10%) - Google trends data to see what people are searching and what sentiment this carries.
As you can see, the index is quite well thought out, but does have some subjective variables (social media/surveys) and some measures which only indirectly show fear/greed (volatility/volume). The indicator should be used in conjunction with other methods and research. It is definitely a useful tool to have, but please understand how it works!
In one district I know, the way the high school history teachers taught was, for years, almost all lectures. In fact, one teacher who DIDN'T lecture all the time told me that other teachers asked him, "When do you actually teach?" Projects, group collaborations, authentic assessment -- none of that was the norm. Almost all the lessons were lectures; almost all the assessments (really, all of them, apparently) were multiple choice questions and essays.
I'm curious: What are the dominant modes of teaching in your department? How is learning assessed?
What's your personal methodology for Windows PrivEsc? I don't seem to have a problem getting shells, and no problems with Linux PrivEsc, but Windows seems to be stumping me more often than not. Any good flowcharts/guides/etc you use?
Please listen to the radio interview excerpts below:
Please note: the sentence is repeated to make the video longer.
A second statement by David Paulides.
David Paulides tells his radio listeners he will not include cases where a person was attacked by an animal, but how accurate is this statement?
I will here deconstruct two Missing 411 cases where hunters (Carl Herrick and Sam Adams) were killed by bears.
Carl Herrick (1943)
Carl Herrick was a 37-year-old hunter who went missing in Vermont in November of 1943. Herrick was out hunting with his cousin, but he failed to return to their camp. Herrick's body was found three days later by searchers and forensic evidence plus an autopsy showed Herrick had been killed by a bear.
Evidence shows Carl Herrick shot a bear and then approached the bear (believing it was dead when it was not). A struggle ensued and Herrick bled to death.
How does David Paulides treat this case?
| Missing 411 Facts (EUS, p. 267-268) | Deconstruction |
|---|---|
| "After conducting thousands of hours of research and reading countless documents about a person's cause of death I have never read about a bear that squeezed an adult to death." | It is not really relevant how many cases David Paulides personally is aware of, it does not make the evidence pertaining to the Herrick case evidence any worse. The Boston Globe states (09 Dec, 1943) states: “None doubted the killer was a huge bear, believed to weigh between 300 and 400 pounds. Bits of bear fur were found on the front of Herrick’s jumper, where, Dr. Otis said, the animal’s forepaws had clasped the man in a mighty crushing embrace which squeezed up on his inner organs, ruptured his left lung and pressed the breath out of him. Hemorrhage of the lung caused him to bleed to death, the doctor said.”. Bear fur was found on Herrick's jumper which means no 21st century researcher is able to reject the idea a bear was involved (unless that researcher is able to collect new evidence that is stronger than the current pieces of evidence). |
| "Many of the articles surmised that Carl shot a bear, placed his rifle against a tree, and walked up to the body to find the bear still alive." | This is correct. The Barre Daily (27 Nov, 1943) states: *"Bear tracks on the ground nearby, the finding of an empty cartridge shell, and the position of Herrick's rifle against a t |
Hi guys,
Can anyone suggest a resource (video, article, book, anything) which helped them get better at delivering a properly structured methodology?
I'm a Food Historian/Scandinavian Studies PhD student (Early Career Researcher) and I just can't seem to get the methodology right without major revisions and ultimately limping across the finish line with it. Bonus points, obviously, if your suggestion is Humanities-based rather than hard science, but I'll take what I can get. I feel like such a damn potato here.
Yes, I have a supervisor which one is meant to ask these questions of, BUT he is the kind of high-quality, dedicated coach who says, "I will no longer be giving you feedback on any of your submissions to me, so just keep writing."
You know. The kind of mentor a young scholar dreams about. So I could really, really use any advice or suggestions here. Thank you.
Hello, I'm trying to understand the methodology or workflow of people more experienced than me.
What would you do in this scenario:
HOST: Port 445 open along with other ports, Windows 7 2016 RDC
You need to get inside this to delete some logs or something
how would you get inside like, what would you use (rdcclient + metasploit for example) what would you look for (ports, other stuff) and what would you do once you get a foothold
Thanks to whoever will reply
Edit:typos
Hi there,
I'm going to be studying at UNSW this year after HSC/ATAR results arrive in 1-2 weeks. I did pretty well in HS and was curious as to how current university students changed their study methods following high school. Do you study in a similar fashion to how you studied for the HSC/VCE etc. or did everything change? And if you don't study in a similar fashion, how/why did your study habits change and what advice would you give to me prior to starting uni?
Note: 'HS' = high school
Thank you!
EDITED: Is it considered good pratice to just name your CSS what you think is best fit and not use any CSS methodology? would it make it very hard to maintain and improve on projects?
