Pretty much that. I can literally never post anywhere that simply says I have her at 4 or 5 (so not even like top 3 lol) without several people shoving down my throat about how wrong I am for including her in my top 5. She's literally been picking up nearly as many critic nominations alongside Stewart, Gaga, Kidman, etc, and she currently has been more prevalent than Colman, Haim, and certainly Zegler and Cruz. I'm not calling her a lock or anything, but how am I the craziest person in the world just for including her in my top 5 lol.
https://twitter.com/GraceRandolph/status/1446646729672208386
No spoilers in this post BTW.
WTF
I mean, I'll have enough self control not to read any of the reviews, but still.
WHY is the embargo up tomorrow instead of nearer the release??? Why can't reviewers NOT spoil things???
Basically anyone can spoil the film now without repercussions.
Good luck to all of you! Time to be careful for the next month or so.
Sure, she got some things right before. But I’m starting to notice the scoops that get the most attention are the ones that are starting beef and not info about the films themselves.
Like when she said Pattinson was too weak to even throw a punch, Pedro Pascal being annoyed at Lucasfilm about his face not being shown, and now she says Pattinson and Matt Reeves despise one another. And don’t get me started about going her going head to head with Cathy Yan
Don’t know about you but this sounds like beef starting to me...
Welcome to our Source Accuracy Discussion series! Over the next week, we will discuss the accuracy of various sources and use this detail to adjust our accuracy tiers.
Today's discussion will be focus on Grace Randolph. Start by filling out the this poll to place Grace Randolph in a tier.
To participate further, you can leave a comment with evidence of accurate scoops / leaks / news provided by this source.
Discussion Guidelines:
- Provide respectful commentary only.
- Personal attacks, ad hominem arguments, toxic and otherwise unproductive commentary will be removed.
- Simping, fawning, gushing over a source is also frowned upon.
- Just stick to the facts and leave your personal opinion or editorializing of information out of it.
- Provide empirical evidence, not anecdotal evidence.
- This means your comments should focus on evidence that is verifiable
- (ex. Kevin Feige claimed that the weather would be rainy on Monday. The weather was sunny on Monday.).
- Anecdotal evidence is based on feeling or your own experiences - while it may be true, it does not help someone independently evaluate accuracy.
- This means your comments should focus on evidence that is verifiable
- Provide appropriate context.
- This means avoiding cherry picking, using a second hand source as evidence for / against accuracy, or misrepresenting a statement is frowned upon.
- (eg. Kevin Feige (When asked about Spider-Man appearing in Infinity War): "I would say, that is....(omitted)....the surprise"; Twitter user MyMarvelOnly283: "According to Kevin Feige, Toby Maguire will appear in Infinity War")
- This means avoiding cherry picking, using a second hand source as evidence for / against accuracy, or misrepresenting a statement is frowned upon.
- Focus on content related to the MCU above all else.
- This means that a source's accuracy with the MCU is most important, even if they are not accurate with other media (such as DCEU or Star Wars). Likewise, accuracy with other media (such as DCEU or Star Wars) should not be a focus instead of accuracy with the MCU.
Example comments:
- Kevin Feige - 10-27-16 claimed that Avengers: Infinity War would be released on May 4, 2018; this was verified on May 4, 2018 when I saw Infinity War in the movie theater. Link: https://collider.com/kevin-feige-avengers-infinity-war-spider-man-mcu-interview/
- Tom Holland - On December 9, 2016, provided specific details surrounding scenes in Spider-Man: Homecoming; however, since the release of Avengers: Endgame he has not accurately re
Jason Kilar is very happy with the current performance of the snydercut, and we should start to see how much it made for Warner Media sometime this week, or the next.
https://youtu.be/3Klz6kd4Gw4 - 9 minute non-spoiler review
I've tried to get through her "content", but she's about as genuine as a two dollar bill. I doubt she's as connected as she thinks she is. I put her on the level of Midnight's Edge, Doomschlong and the rest of the YouTube grift brigade. But yeah, she tweeted this.
That that last flash leak was a crock of shit. Anything that was correct was what we already knew.
