A list of puns related to "Edith Frank"
Abagael Abagail Abbe Abbey Abbi Abbie Abby Abigael Abigail Abigale Abra Acacia Ada Adah Adaline Adara Addie Addis Adel Adela Adelaide Adele Adelice Adelina Adelind Adeline Adella Adelle Adena Adey Adi Adiana Adina Adora Adore Adoree Adorne Adrea Adria Adriaens Adrian Adriana Adriane Adrianna Adrianne Adrien Adriena Adrienne Aeriel Aeriela Aeriell Ag Agace Agata Agatha Agathe Aggi Aggie Aggy Agna Agnella Agnes Agnese Agnesse Agneta Agnola Agretha Aida Aidan Aigneis Aila Aile Ailee Aileen Ailene Ailey Aili Ailina Ailyn Aime Aimee Aimil Aina Aindrea Ainslee Ainsley Ainslie Ajay Alaine Alameda Alana Alanah Alane Alanna Alayne Alberta Albertina Albertine Albina Alecia Aleda Aleece Aleecia Aleen Alejandra Alejandrina Alena Alene Alessandra Aleta Alethea Alex Alexa Alexandra Alexandrina Alexi Alexia Alexina Alexine Alexis Alfie Alfreda Ali Alia Alica Alice Alicea Alicia Alida Alidia Alina Aline Alis Alisa Alisha Alison Alissa Alisun Alix Aliza Alla Alleen Allegra Allene Alli Allianora Allie Allina Allis Allison Allissa Allsun Ally Allyce Allyn Allys Allyson Alma Almeda Almeria Almeta Almira Almire Aloise Aloisia Aloysia Alpa Alta Althea Alvera Alvina Alvinia Alvira Alyce Alyda Alys Alysa Alyse Alysia Alyson Alyss Alyssa Amabel Amabelle Amalea Amalee Amaleta Amalia Amalie Amalita Amalle Amanda Amandi Amandie Amandy Amara Amargo Amata Amber Amberly Ambrosia Ambur Ame Amelia Amelie Amelina Ameline Amelita Ami Amie Amity Ammamaria Amy Ana Anabel Anabella Anabelle Anais Analiese Analise Anallese Anallise Anastasia Anastasie Anastassia Anatola Andee Andi Andie Andra Andrea Andreana Andree Andrei Andria Andriana Andriette Andromache Andromeda Andy Anestassia Anet Anett Anetta Anette Ange Angel Angela Angele Angelia Angelica Angelika Angelina Angeline Angelique Angelita Angelle Angie Angil Angy Ania Anica Anissa Anita Anitra Anja Anjanette Anjela Ann Ann-Mari Ann-Marie Anna Anna-Diana Anna-Diane Anna-Maria Annabal Annabel Annabela Annabell Annabella Annabelle Annadiana Annadiane Annalee Annalena Annaliese Annalisa Annalise Annalyse Annamari Annamaria Annamarie Anne Anne-Corinne Anne-Mar Anne-Marie Annecorinne Anneliese Annelise Annemarie Annetta Annette Anni Annice Annie Annissa Annmaria Annmarie Annnora Annora Anny Anselma Ansley Anstice Anthe Anthea Anthia Antoinette Antonella Antonetta Antonia Antonie Antonietta Antonina Anya Aphrodite Appolonia April Aprilette Ara Arabel Arabela Arabele Arabella Arabelle Arda Ardath Ardeen Ardelia Ardelis Ardella Ardelle Arden Ardene
... keep reading on reddit β‘President Thomas Woodrow Wilson
[Insert Paragraph talking about how everyone hates Wilson, but I like him and I ask that you at least read this before downvoting.]
Supreme Court -
Wilson gets credit for appointing two good Supreme Court Justices - Louis Brandeis and John H. Clarke. They were both stalwart defenders of protecting the worker, civil liberties, and the fight against corruption. In my opinion, Wilson played a big role in fighting for his nomination and ensuring it passed despite the widespread opposition to him from the establishment. Now, on the other hand, he did nominate the awful reactionary James McClark Reynolds. However, when Wilson appointed him, Reynolds had a reputation (deservedly so) as a trustbuster and an opponent of Wall Street domination. That is why Wilson made him AG. But Wilson quickly realized Reynolds was an awful person to work with and was not going to be the AG Wilson needed. Thus, he shipped him to the Court where he assumed Reynolds would at least destroy trusts and do not much else. Sadly, he ended up ruining the life of Justice Clarke who resigned because of how poorly Reynolds treated him.
Domestic Policy -
Edit** for all those who called this a conspiracy theory and witch hunt.
look at the text in the middle of this picture.
https://preview.redd.it/fdwcozw3qgw71.png?width=3840&format=png&auto=webp&s=262656f215a269cfcd5e79ef3f00fe766a5aea6a
The owner of this site has temporarily banned you. HSTS protocols are set up and configurable in Cloudflare in the HSTS panel. You can throttle scale and even turn to throttling off.
They are at the control panel. I have so much shit ti say but this post is longer than most care for. This is screwed-up gang.
if you want to see the epic emotional cancer thats going on dig through r/kucoin no one ever mentions gains. ......
Report them to reddit! Help me save crypto noobs from being harvested like explosion for preproduction on a Michal Bay film
Here is a link to part 2. I responded to u/Johnny_KuCoinhttps://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/qf4ka4/followup_on_kucoin_cloudflare_and_more/
***Edit ***
TLDR summary
The crux is they don't spend money on It and make money in doing so.
Ask the exchange(s):
While they may say "we dont make money indirectly off insurance funds" they absolutely do.
its your right as an investor to have this detail You have every right to know the details of an insurance fund you are paying into.
Since everyone accepts that a lot of exchanges do this, other exchanges do it to. I literally have screenshots of conversations that say this much.
You are being throttled out. They can indeed scale up at a cost.
If for some reason they can not they have a fiduciary duty the moment they take your funds to tell you the risk of their incapable IT architecture and settings. Moreover, they could just install a kill switch that ends trades without penalty if the web servers go down or they exceed band width.
As cost-effective as it is to build in a kill switch as a solution its not profitable to exchanges that are having a liquidity crisis. Assets on exchanges are becoming more scarce. (reference IEP 1559 and many other facets)
If an exchange restricts your access they should still not be placing higher priority orders via the OTC desk while you are locked out. This should also be disclosed.
While they may say we dont make money indirectly off insurance funds they absolutely do.
Cloudflare is the brand of e
... keep reading on reddit β‘High school seniors in 1933, so born ~1915-16.
This yearbook is unusual in that it seems to only list nicknames that were actually used, rather than assigning almost everyone one.
#Boys
#Girls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-IDHABfB9V8&t=2s
Our main points in this video are that as tomorrow is the anniversary of Christopher Tolkien's death, this is something to be honoured by Tolkien fans the world over. The man dedicated his life to his father's dream and was an incredible fan of ME & the finest fantasy editor imaginable, as he edited and gave and gave to this incredible community without even a second's hesitation. Sure he was essentially his father's favourite child, but this was still a lot to ask of the man, and he fulfilled his duties as literary executor perfectly and with incredible dignity. If anyone deserves to stand shoulder to shoulder next to Howard & Tolkien, it would be Christopher for all he did/accomplished.
Christopher Tolkien is frankly a man who should have been knighted, should be a household name and deserves all the praise in the world. He could have been far more mercenary, less genuinely devoted to his father's work than what he was, and yet he never shirked from his duties as literary executor and even dedicated the remainder of his life to his father's dream/work. Rarely has a father had such a great son, and I truly think Tolkien loved Christopher and that this best-friend duo & father-son duo is an inspiration to us all. Hope you guys don't mind the sentimentality of this post, it's just I'm on a re-read of LOTR & Silmarillion (both in French (my native language), with Christopher & his own son Adam having aided in the translation of) and am so grateful to Christopher for giving so much to the world and his dad and this incredible fandom.
The Silmarillion (and all its attendant epics) are not only a testament to Tolkien's talents (and love for Edith, and bond with Lewis) but we should also consider it a testament of the love shared between JRRT & his 'dearest' son Christopher. May he rest in peace by his father's side (a father who is without a doubt proud and happy, with his son).
Okay, I know that the rather bland (and frankly old-fashioned) debate of Monarchy vs Republic has been talked to death at this point. Many I would say are just sick and tired of the debate whether or not Australia ought to be a Republic or stick with the Monarchy.
Many here would obviously say to stick with the Monarchy, and I am inclined to agree. And yet, with the recently failed Republicant model proposed in Australia has gotten me thinking.
Why is there only two options for Australia?
The Constitutional Monarchists side, whom argue - which is backed up by historical precedent - that Australia's Constitutional Monarchy system is an even more stable and effective form of government than a republican form; as the Monarchy offers another level of checks and balances, reducing the risk of totalitarianism and populism that plagues many republics. Whereas the Republicans argue that Australia is a "mature" country, acknowledging that we are an independent country, but would rather do away with the symbolic brotherhood Australia has with the United Kingdom and go it's own way, (along with those ideologues who actually see a republic as a means to change Australia into what they want, but I'm not going to debate this since it's not the topic at hand).
Until now, the so called "Debate" on whether or not we should become a Republic or Monarchy has more or less been limited to only these two options; retaining the Status Quo, with Queen Elizabeth II as Australia's Sovereign, represented in Australia by the Governor-General, or replacing it with (at this point) any number of Republican models. I mean, if you're going to throw shit at the wall, one is bound to stick?
Okay, you've managed to read this far, so I'll go straight to the point. I propose a third option to this "Debate". To keep it short; lets retain the present Constitutional Monarchical Westminister system of government which has served Australia so well, including it's cultural and historical significance, rather than imposing an artificial politicians republic, but replacing the current Monarch and Royal Family with an Australian Sovereign and Australian Royal Family, who has as much legitimacy as the Windsors do. This would be the ultimate minimalist change, it wouldn't threaten the constitutional and democratic make-up of the country and it would be the best middle ground approach.
But, there is a series of questions to be made here. Who can be this "Australian Sovereign"? Who has the legitimacy
... keep reading on reddit β‘Sort of. The public doesn't need to look at a preference matrix to be able to understand the results, but precincts will still report them publicly so us voting nerds can do our analysis.
Okay, so in a sentence, here's the method:
Among the candidates who tie for winning the most head-to-head matchups, elect the candidate with the best average rank.
Let me break that down a bit more by showing you the working ballot language I (and others) have come up with so far.
<candidates and rankings>
To clarify, "best average rank" (tournament-style Borda) is mathematically identical to the margins process described. βBest average rankβ is shorter and sweeter for sure, but hereβs what I fear:
An example ballot from a given voter:
1st: A
2nd: blank
3rd: blank
4th: blank
5th: B
6th: blank
.
.
.
Nth: blank
In the math, we treat that as:
1st: A
2nd: B
3rd: all other candidates tied
which is mathematically equivalent, but clearly not what the voter expressed. Even with the explicit instruction that βSkipped ranks are simply ignored and will neither hurt nor help your vote.β, the phrase "Best average rankβ will cause many voters to construe ranks as scores. The ballot language needs to clearly convey that the focus is simply on candidates being ranked higher or lower than each other and that the magnitude (greater than 0) of the distance between their ranks is irrelevant.
As you can see, there's quite the range of how descriptive the ballot language can get. I'm down to keep working on ballot language; I want to have several different version and do actual field testing with the different descriptions to find the best one
A family member brought home a 3 week old puppy. She has no clue how to care for it and frankly lacks the patience to get up with her round the clock for feeding, so I've assumed the responsibility of nursing and weaning her.
It's been a long time and most of my experience with infant animals comes from kittens or field mice, so while I have some sense regarding the situation, I don't know in what ways dogs differ and what I should look out for.
For example: The puppy (Edith) has just begun eliminating on her own this morning. Should she be pooping after every feeding?
How fat are puppies supposed to be? I think Edith is a blue heeler/possible mix. She's pretty stubby, but I'm not sure if her belly is a bit bloated or she just looks that way on account of being a dog. She's taking less of the milk mix* I made than I figure she ought to and she burps sometimes. She weighs about a pound and drinks a bit under 4oz per feeding.
At what age can I increase the time between feedings? I've currently got her schedule set to every 4 hours for my own sanity. I checked online before scheduling her this way and what I've read says it's alright. I also read that she should be able to begin weaning around 5 weeks. How do I go about that? Formula in some wet dog food to get her used to solids?
*I met a lady at a small store who said she breeds dogs and have me this recipe since I can't find any proper formula.
>1 part evaporated milk
>1 part water
>Three pinches of Gerber's rice cereal
Is it good? How can I improve it? We don't have vitamins drops or anything like that here, so I'm not sure what else to add to make it more nutritionally sound and I don't want to experiment in case something I try is unsafe.
What else should I know about all this?
Spider-Man: Far From Home is a pretty good movie. I understand that a lot of people really didn't like it and they all had valid criticisms. For the most part, though, I can overlook those faults.
Again, FFH is pretty good. Hell I'd even say it's a great movie ... if and only if you mercilessly excise anything that's even tangentially related to Brad.
Look, I get it. You want to add a teen melodrama subplot to a superhero movie so you used some common tropes. I get it. But even excluding my intense dislike of melodramatic tropes, that's not an excuse to write a horrible, horrible subplot.
Brad is the root cause of 90% of what's wrong with this movie. His presence is basically warping reality around him and making everything and everyone connected to him in any way lose like fifty IQ points.
Alright, let's give some background. So, Brad is this guy who exists in FFH to be a sitcom archnemesis to Peter. He's basically just a plot device to cause drama. Bread has zero personality, no character traits, and no substance besides being said plot device. Oh, and Breed also has the hots for MJ.
Sure, why not? I don't like circumstances like this - at all - but I can tolerate them. Until the single worst sequence of three scenes I have ever seen in recent memory.
1. Foreign lady pervs on a highschooler and is caught on camera
Let's skip past my other problems with this scene because those aren't relevant to this rant. Anyway, Peter has his pants down in front of this woman and Bad Boy somehow shows up and snaps a picture. Why the fuck weren't there SHIELD guards to prevent unauthorized access when the Night Monkey^TM suit is right there?! How the fuck did Brady Bunch just waltz past all of them if there were?
2. Bad Boy wants to be a Good Boy and threatens to tell on Peter.
I don't remember the specifics of this scene. The first time I watched it, I wanted to walk out of the theater. But because my disabled ass wouldn't make it past the aisle, and because I still wanted to see the rest of the movie, all I did was close my eyes. I skip this scene on rewatch because I can't handle it.
Putting aside the details of how the scene happened (aka the previous scene) and my personal hatred of contrived misunderstandings, I'm fine with the idea behind this scene. Except ... didn't we already cover this last movie? Homecoming (incidentally my favorite Spider Man movie) already dealt with the disadvantages of a double life, and did it better. Why fo
... keep reading on reddit β‘I don't want to step on anybody's toes here, but the amount of non-dad jokes here in this subreddit really annoys me. First of all, dad jokes CAN be NSFW, it clearly says so in the sub rules. Secondly, it doesn't automatically make it a dad joke if it's from a conversation between you and your child. Most importantly, the jokes that your CHILDREN tell YOU are not dad jokes. The point of a dad joke is that it's so cheesy only a dad who's trying to be funny would make such a joke. That's it. They are stupid plays on words, lame puns and so on. There has to be a clever pun or wordplay for it to be considered a dad joke.
Again, to all the fellow dads, I apologise if I'm sounding too harsh. But I just needed to get it off my chest.
Please find the list below:
US: A Narrative History Volume 1: To 1877, 8th Edition: James West Davidson
Starting Out with Python, 5th Edition: Tony Gaddis
Sanders' Paramedic Textbook Includes Navigate 2 Essentials Access, 5th Edition: Mick J. Sanders & AAOS & Kim McKenna
Sanders' Paramedic Student Workbook, 5th Edition: Mick J. Sanders & American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS)
Philosophical, Ideological, and Theoretical Perspectives on Education, 2nd Edition: Gerald L. Gutek
Metaphysics, Meaning, and Modality: Themes from Kit Fine: Mircea Dumitru
Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, 8th Edition: Dale Schunk
Investments, 9th Canadian Edition: Zvi Bodie & Alex Kane & Alan Marcus & Lorne Switzer
Intelligence Analysis: A Target-Centric Approach, 6th Edition: Robert M. Clark
HR3 with CourseMate, 1 term, 3rd Edition: Angelo DeNisi & Ricky Griffin
Horngren's Accounting, Volume 2, 11th Canadian Edition: Tracie Miller-Nobles & Brenda Mattison & Ella Mae Matsumura
Fundamentals of Business Organizations for Paralegals, 6th Edition: Deborah E. Bouchoux
Financial Accounting, 15th Edition: Carl S. Warren & James M. Reeve & Jonathan Duchac
Contemporary Business, 18th Edition: Louis E. Boone & David L. Kurtz & Susan Berston
Auditing: Assurance and Risk, 4th Edition: W. Robert Knechel & Steven E. Salterio
Beginner's Guide to SOLIDWORKS 2020, Level II: Alejandro Reyes
CCNA 200-301 Official Cert Guide, Volume 1, 1st Edition: Odom Wendell
CCNA 200-301 Official Cert Guide, Volume 2, 1st Edition: Odom Wendell
The New One Minute Manager, 1st Edition: Ken Blanchard & Spencer Johnson
Mosby's Guide to Nursing Diagnosis, 6th Edition: Gail B. Ladwig & Betty J. Ackley & Mary Beth Makic
Your Research Project: Designing, Planning, and Getting Started, 4th Edit
EDIT II: THE LIST IS DONE, COMPLETED AT THE BOTTOM
The nurse asked the rabbit, βwhat is your blood type?β
βI am probably a type Oβ said the rabbit.
I just put up a post about what I'd add and change about no way home and it made me think about what else I'd change about Spiderman in the MCU so that's what I'm doing now. Quick side note I know this is fixing/changing some of the MCU Spiderman moments and I know that that includes no way home but since I just made a post on it I'm not gonna motion anything changes I'd make to that movie in the post so if you want know what I'd change about no way home go read that post I'll link it at the end so you can read it after I've you've read this anyway onto the topic of this post.
Captain America Civil War: The thing I'm going to be changing most is Spiderman power level because his power level is all over the place one minute he can beat Falcon and Bucky the next he's getting a beatdown from Captain America. This never really sat right with me and this is the movie where I make the least amount changes to Spiderman so here's how I'd change Spiderman in Captain America Civil War. This time when Spiderman goes to the terminal to fight Falcon and Bucky after he kicks Falcon into a wall he goes to punch Bucky but Bucky catches it with his metal arm and easily starts to over power Spiderman just like in the original only it's Bucky who's over powering Spiderman then Spiderman says "You have a metal arm that is awesome dude." then Falcon tackles Spiderman out of the terminal and they have a really fun cool fight which will be about as long as the original with all the banter and it ends in the same way where Falcon uses Red Wing to catch one of Spiderman webs and throw him threw a window. Also we can have that "couldn't have done that earlier." "I hate you." moment later in the battle maybe they fight Black Panther and Falcon can fly into the air then fly down and kick black panther into some crates. Ok back to the main topic instead of Captain America and Spiderman fighting because A Captain America won't want to fight a teenager and B Spiderman won't want to fight one of his idols so instead of having them fight I'd have Captain America save Spiderman this way we still get there fun conversation without it being inter cut with them kicking each other into airport equipment. So like in the original they 2 team run at each other and fight but this time it's Hawkeye and Spiderman who break away from the main battle Hawkeye fires an arrow at Spiderman web causing him to fall but this time Spiderman falls underneath the the jet bridge then vison comes in and Hawkey
... keep reading on reddit β‘I rarely write reviews about anything, only when I'm really impressed or when I'm really annoyed at the difference between what is promised and what is delivered. In this case, it's actually neither of the two - Disco Elysium is an ok-ish game in my Encyclopedia, but at the same time it's being praised for something it clearly isn't.
I'm writing this to vent a little bit, but also as a warning for others who are hyped with all the good reviews as I was, especially since this game should be a very good match for me, based on my personal preferences. This isn't a 10/10 game, it lacks very serious qualities that other RPG/open world/indie games have.
But let's start with the great: your main character is a crazed drug-addict alcoholic "detective" who has some seriously hilarious inner monologue and dialogue options. The inner monologue especially grips you right from the start, and how you setup you character at the beginning will influence this and how you interact with the world the most. You really can go all the way and run around with no pants saying "I'm not really a detective that investigates things". You can put your one shoe on and have an argument with the mirror on where you got your facial expression from. And you can, and you most definitely should, play this game with a lot of cheating, maxing your stats or winning all checks, because it really opens up new alleys.
However, for me, this is where the great stuff ends. The rest of it I found either ok or just not to my taste at all.
First of all, this isn't an open world game. I've no idea how it can be marketed as such, have they ever seen open world games? NPCs do literally nothing but go to bed at night, and the "world" is one tiny and frankly useless map. It's static and dead and doesn't change one bit. It's barely a world, let alone an "open" one.
It's not really an RPG neither. Yes, you have stats and an inventory and dice rolls, but that is about it. And besides, those are just game mechanics (like Tomb Raider, it also has a skill tree and an inventory, but it's hardly an RPG, I hope), there is no real choice at all, since all the difference comes down to dialogue options (which you will click all of them anyway, destroying the "role playing" part even more), and for many things, choosing to do something will actually be a dice roll, and the mechanics on retrying the roll are overly complicated. No matter what you do, you will be railroaded to the game's one ending (which makes sens
... keep reading on reddit β‘The doctor says it terminal.
Alot of great jokes get posted here! However just because you have a joke, doesn't mean it's a dad joke.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT NSFW, THIS IS ABOUT LONG JOKES, BLONDE JOKES, SEXUAL JOKES, KNOCK KNOCK JOKES, POLITICAL JOKES, ETC BEING POSTED IN A DAD JOKE SUB
Try telling these sexual jokes that get posted here, to your kid and see how your spouse likes it.. if that goes well, Try telling one of your friends kid about your sex life being like Coca cola, first it was normal, than light and now zero , and see if the parents are OK with you telling their kid the "dad joke"
I'm not even referencing the NSFW, I'm saying Dad jokes are corny, and sometimes painful, not sexual
So check out r/jokes for all types of jokes
r/unclejokes for dirty jokes
r/3amjokes for real weird and alot of OC
r/cleandadjokes If your really sick of seeing not dad jokes in r/dadjokes
Punchline !
Edit: this is not a post about NSFW , This is about jokes, knock knock jokes, blonde jokes, political jokes etc being posted in a dad joke sub
Edit 2: don't touch the thermostat
Sorry for the delay in putting up a new request thread after the last one got archived. With this, the subreddit rule about only posting padoru requests here in this thread and not spamming the subreddit with separate posts for your requests is now back in effect.
Post requests for the padorus you'd like to be made. Remember to search on Google first to see if the padoru you want has already been done.
If you make one of the padorus, or if you find one that someone else has made, feel free to post it on the subreddit. But if you do, please also post a comment here saying that the padoru has been made/found.
Do your worst!
How the hell am I suppose to know when itβs raining in Sweden?
Mathematical puns makes me number
We told her she can lean on us for support. Although, we are going to have to change her driver's license, her height is going down by a foot. I don't want to go too far out on a limb here but it better not be a hack job.
Ants donβt even have the concept fathers, let alone a good dad joke. Keep r/ants out of my r/dadjokes.
But no, seriously. I understand rule 7 is great to have intelligent discussion, but sometimes it feels like 1 in 10 posts here is someone getting upset about the jokes on this sub. Let the mods deal with it, they regulate the sub.
I'm surprised it hasn't decade.
They were cooked in Greece.
So i have a dictionary where the values are in order like so:
{'Geni': 9, 'Dave': 8, 'Helen': 7, 'Edith': 6, 'Carol': 5, 'Bob': 4, 'Frank': 2, 'Alice': 1}
and basically I want to give copy the first three key value pairs and put them into another dictionary, this is what i have so far.
output_dict = {}
for r in my_dict.items():
for n in sorted_dict.values():
a = grab_key(my_dict, n)
output_dict.update({a:n})
print(output_dict)
i can't figure out how to only make the loop run a certain amount of times. lets say I only want the first 3 people in the dictionary, like geni, dave and Helen, in the output dict, but idk how to do it only three times. I would appreciate if anyone could help me out.
He lost May
High school juniors and seniors in 1904, so born ~1886-88
#Boys
#Girls
High school seniors in 1944, so born ~1926-27.
#Boys
#Girls
#Boys
#Girls
Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.