The chain of incompetence, surreal untruths, life ending, life changing events unfolding presently will require U.S. Congressional review and hearings. An independent panel will be commissioned and their report will lead to a chronological review and explanation of all the events, actions and actors that lead to the widespread COVID-19 pandemic outbreak that took place in the United States. The loss of life, treasures, jobs, businesses, lifestyle upheaval and general net negative shock to the American way of life will merit U.S. Congressional level review and hearings.
In an opinion column yesterday, Thomas Friedman envisioned a Democratic cabinet that included many of the 2020 candidates, from Sanders to Biden, that he believed would unite the party and ensure a Democratic landslide.
Although the piece itself reads somewhat like liberal Avengers fan fiction, the idea itself that progressives need moderate votes to win (and vice versa) has been repeated by many in the media. So is this kind of unity slate meant to bring together both wings of the party possible, and would it be likely to succeed?
The argument that everyone always gives for not being able to drink at 21 is that the brain isn't fully developed yet, etc. But we allow these same people, who can't even legally purchase a beer, to go and die for us? I understand that not every 18 year old that joins the military is gonna die obviously. But this isn't just some high risk job. The point of the military is defence and fighting. Yes I get that there are other positions that never see combat. But that doesn't change the fact that they CAN see combat. now, I'm not arguing that the drinking age should be lowered, or that the military age should be increased. Obviously one of those would have to happen if we made them the same age, but I'm not really for one of the other, as I am no expert. But I cannot fathom how people think it's okay to allow people to join the military, but they can't even have a beer. And soon they won't even be able to have a cigarette.
Im actually not sure what would change my view on this subject. I'm not really sure what could be said to me that wood convince me that it's okay to send somebody to potentially kill other people, but somehow drinking a beer is more detrimental to their health (or whatever other reason anybody can come up with for this law).
however, I am open to discussion, and I am certainly open to have in my view changed.
CMV
Edit: I keep seeing the same arguments over and over, just worded differently. Nobody has changed my view, and I have to go to work.
I just want to clarify that the entire point of my argument is that once the United States government views an individual as an adult, they should be able to make all of these decisions by themselves. If they consider 18 to be an adult, they should be able to make these decisions. the entire point of being considered an adult, is that the government recognizes that you are able to make your own decisions and take care of yourself and provide for yourself. But they don't trust you to have a drink or smoke. but of course they don't mind if you join the military, because that benefits them. and for everyone saying that drinking harms of the people, so does joining the military. Family sometimes don't get to see their children and loved ones for four or more years at a time. Not only that, but if that person dies in the military, the entire family is devastated. It may not be the same effects as drinking and driving and killing somebody on the road, but to say that the military and drinking aren't
... keep reading on reddit ➡Before you proceed, make sure you read Part1 here.
So what do we do next? What comes to mind when I say: 3,4,5? Yes, 2 and 6. And when the I-SEE-A-FROG Anons see a picture of a journalist, a 6 and a 2, they immediately scream: COVFEFE! Why? Because COVFEFE=62 and I told you in this post COVFEFE was referring to Trump’s promise to dismantle Mockingbird media.
Now you understand why Anderson, out of blue, brought in COVFEFE in his second video (wearing a red tie): he understood Kelly Ann’s additional clues and was able to clarify the decode he made the day before (when his tie was blue). I do not have the space to go through it in detail but here is a synthetic image Img7 You will see that by purposely mistaking the age of the 2 month old November tweet with 3 months in order to draw attention, then showing Michael Jordan’s 23, then saying ‘Elf on the Shelf’, he’s pointing at Gingerbread GITMO Q2595 and its timestamp structure. He then confirms GITMO through the insistence on Winter is Coming’. You know what or who Winter refers to right? It’s Damon Winter, the Pullitzer NY Times Photographer who made a beautiful collection of black and white photos of GITMO link. He then pulls in Acting Attorney General Whitaker by playing with the phonetics resemblance with Game of Throne’s White Walker and finally brings in the framing of black hats in the CIA=13 through the trolling Fake News Time Magazine cover dated 3.1.2009. Excellent decode AC! I see you have some knowledge of falconry and noticed the code bar of the trolling magazine was 25-2-7-4-1-3-5 which is Y B G D A C E and reads BY CADGE when re-arranged! Framing of all the actors and scams on the Time Magazine cover confirmed!
Let that sink in. This trolling fake cover was made in 2009. When do you think the Maestro started preparing for his carnage of the Deep State we are currently witnessing?!
Conclusion: with his blue tie, AC informed his network he was guessing the poster meant the legal framing of high level officials and rogue C_A operators and their transportation to GITMO.
The next day, wearing a red tie, he shared an interpretation with more confidence using Kelly Ann’s additional clues. Let’s listen to her until the end video. The clues are here: “I t
... keep reading on reddit ➡
