SFW

Ray Harrington is a comedian and filmmaker from New England and this is his legally mandated podcast as a [Content Creator™®℠©].

Bob Gale makes Content™ with Ray as they discuss all things Back To The Future! The writing process, the small details and easter eggs, making half the movie with a different actor, and a public apology for the Back To The Future Nintendo game! All this and more in a very special episode of Ray Harrington Must Content.

Spotify Apple Podcasts Amazon Simplecast

Ray Harrington homepage

Since drafting a QB is the hot topic I complied a list of every first run quarterback drafted by team in the Super Bowl era. What team do you think has done the best & worst in picking franchise QB’s?

Bears (five): Mitchell Trubisky (2017); Rex Grossman (2003); Cade McNown (1999); Jim Harbaugh (1987); Jim McMahon (1982).

Bengals (six): Joe Burrow (2020); Carson Palmer (2003); Akili Smith (1999); David Klinger (1992); Jack Thompson (1979); Greg Cook (1969).

Bills (four): Josh Allen (2018); EJ Manuel (2013); J.P. Losman (2004); Jim Kelly (1983).

Broncos (four): Paxton Lynch (2016); Tim Tebow (2010); Jay Cutler (2006); Tommy Maddox (1992).

Browns (seven): Baker Mayfield (2018); Johnny Manziel (2014); Brandon Weeden (2012); Brady Quinn (2007); Tim Couch (1999); Bernie Kosar (1985 supplemental); Mike Phipps (1970).

Buccaneers (five): Jameis Winston (2015); Josh Freeman (2009); Trent Dilfer (1994); Vinny Testaverde (1987); Doug Williams (1978).

Colts (six): Andrew Luck (2012); Peyton Manning (1998); Jeff George (1990); John Elway (1983); Art Schlicter (1982); Bert Jones (1973).

Cardinals (six): Kyler Murray (2019); Josh Rosen (2018); Matt Leinart (2006); Timm Rosenbach (1989 supplemental); Kelly Stouffer (1987); Steve Pisarkiewicz (1977).

Chargers (four): Justin Herbert (2020); Eli Manning (2004); Ryan Leaf (1998); Marty Domres (1969).

Chiefs (three): Patrick Mahomes (2017); Todd Blackledge (1983); Steve Fuller (1979).

Cowboys (two): Troy Aikman (1989); Steve Walsh (1989 supplemental).

Dolphins (five): Tua Tagovailoa (2020); Ryan Tannehill (2012); Dan Marino (1983); Bob Griese (1967); Rick Norton (1966).

Eagles (three): Carson Wentz (2016); Donovan McNabb (1999); John Reaves (1972);

Falcons (five): Matt Ryan (2008); Michael Vick (2001); Chris Miller (1987); Steve Bartowski (1975); Randy Johnson (1966).

49ers (three): Alex Smith (2005); Jim Druckenmiller (1997); Steve Spurrier (1967).

Giants (four): Daniel Jones (2019); Philip Rivers (2004); Dave Brown (1992 supplemental); Phil Simms (1979).

Jaguars (three): Blake Bortles (2013); Blaine Gabbert (2011); Byron Leftwich (2003).

Jets (five): Sam Darnold (2018); Mark Sanchez (2009); Chad Pennington (2000); Ken O’Brien (1983); Richard Todd (1976).

Lions (five): Matthew Stafford (2009); Joey Harrington (2002); Andre Ware (1990); Chuck Long (1986); Greg Landry (1968).

Packers (five): Jordan Love (2020); Aaron Rodgers (2005); Rich Campbell (1981); Jerry Tagge (1972); Don Horn (1967).

Panthers (t

So in May 2018, I wrote a big post that was in effect a short guide to (what I thought to be) the most essential commentary or commentaries for every book in the Hebrew Bible. If you want the full breakdown on how exactly I assessed* "essential," you can read more in the original post; but it pretty much all boiled down to which commentaries were most philologically and analytically comprehensive, and the most recent.

The business of high–level commentary writing is for the most part pretty slow, for obvious reasons. However, in 2022 there are now a ton of different commentary series out there; and so really, there are multiple commentaries coming out every month. Of course, though, there's pretty wide variance in terms of the quality and intended audience of these.

So this is just a short update to what's new in the world of top-tier commentaries since early 2018. Note, though, that in later 2018, I already made some edits to my original post: to the entry for Isaiah, and some to Zechariah; and I also added new commentaries and details to the section on Amos, Ezekiel, Nahum and Habakkuk.

Finally, please let me know if you know of a post-2017 commentary that I've missed out on. I'd love to be able to add it to this list.

The Anchor series has been quiet since 2018. At the time of my original post, Williamson's massive commentary on Isaiah 6-12 had just been released; and I had mentioned the forthcoming publication of Stephen Cook's commentary on Ezekiel 38-48, released in November 2018.

In what's to me is a rather strange choice, the next slated Anchor release is David Brakke's commentary on the Gospel of Judas, coming out next month. After that, in April, it will release Daniel Schwartz's commentary on 1 Maccabees, replacing the older Anchor commentary by Goldstein from 1976. There's a lot to live up to there, as Goldstein's was definitely one of the best older entries; though Schwartz has already written a fantastic commentary on 2 Maccabees for the Commentaries on Early Jewish Literature series. (On that note, nothing has been released by CEJL since Allison's 2018 commentary on 4 Baruch.)

Hermeneia has been a bit more active than Anchor since 2018. Outside of the canon entirely, VanderKam has continued his es

Previous projects have had to be archived due to character limit, which can now be found here!

#Please Note: This post has been updated, new version can be found here

Additions since posting

• Cast added to Loki (Season 2)
• Old Projects Archived
• Secret Invasion Filming Status Updated
• Hawkeye Cast List Updated
• 2022 & 2023 Film Slate Dates Pushed Back
• Production Statuses Updated for Guardians of the Galaxy: Holiday Special and Vol. 3
• Armor Wars Working Title Added
• Thor: Love and Thunder Cast List Updated
• Eternals and Spider-Man: No Way Home Length Added
• Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness Filming Status Updated
• Legends Episodes Updated
• Spider-Man: No Way Home Cast List & Runtime Updated

#Legends - 8th January 2021

###Status: Currently Streaming; Intermittent Releases

Platform: Disney+

##Synopsis

Post-Investors' Day, Marvel announced a new series focused on iconic moments and characters of the MCU, premiering before their relevant shows and movies to catch-up on the important moments.

The series began streaming on 8th January 2021, and episodes will be released indefinitely ahead of future Marvel projects.

##Episodes

• Wanda Maximoff
• Vision
• Falcon
• The Winter Soldier
• Sharon Carter
• Baron Zemo
• Loki
• The Tesseract/Space Stone
• Black Widow
• Peggy Carter
• The Avengers Initiative
• The Ravagers
• The Ten Rings
• Hawkeye (12th November)

#Assembled

###Status: Currently Streaming; Intermittent Releases

Platform: Disney+

An in-depth look at MCU movies and T.V shows, a comprehensive documentary series streaming on Disney+ that chronicles the creation of Marvel Studios' thrilling new shows and theatrical releases.

This series began streaming on 12th March 2021, a week after WandaVision's final episode was released, and episodes will be released indefinitely after select Marvel Studios properties release.

##Episodes

• The Making of WandaVision (12th March 2021)
• The Making of The Falcon and the Winter Soldier (30th April 2021)

I don't want to step on anybody's toes here, but the amount of non-dad jokes here in this subreddit really annoys me. First of all, dad jokes CAN be NSFW, it clearly says so in the sub rules. Secondly, it doesn't automatically make it a dad joke if it's from a conversation between you and your child. Most importantly, the jokes that your CHILDREN tell YOU are not dad jokes. The point of a dad joke is that it's so cheesy only a dad who's trying to be funny would make such a joke. That's it. They are stupid plays on words, lame puns and so on. There has to be a clever pun or wordplay for it to be considered a dad joke.

Again, to all the fellow dads, I apologise if I'm sounding too harsh. But I just needed to get it off my chest.

Hey /r/printsf!

I enjoy book series where the main characters and/or their civilizations progressively gets stronger in response to some outside threat. This seems like more of a fantasy gimmick than a Sci Fi one, but usually the progression mechanism in those stories is LitRPG based. I'm not the biggest fan of RPG elements in real life. Sci Fi has the ability to do the same thing using gene mods and the discovery of new technology. I usually don't enjoy series that come across as overly right wing, which can be somewhat limiting to my enjoyment of military SF. Please see below for some series I have enjoyed as an example:

Koban by Stephen W. Bennet:

My personal favorite example of this subgenre of Sci Fi. It's not without it's flaws, Bennet writes absolutely everything that happens when more experienced authors would probably cut to the next scene far earlier. Still, I enjoy how their improvement of gene mods makes the characters progressively more of a threat to the hostile alien species. I also enjoy their continuous discovery of new technology and the fact that the aliens are genuinely alien.

Silver Ships by SH Jucha:

The progression here is entirely technology based. I enjoy this series, however the women characters' lack of agency in the series is sort of troubling. Also the early books make heavy use of individual fighter ships, which is a personal pet peeve of mine in military sci-fi. Acceleration in space is determined by mass to thrust ratios, so missiles are always going to be a better option than tiny tin cans that can get easily blasted away the moment they reach engagement range of something that has actual armor.

Odyssey one by Evan Curie:

One of the only series that actually has a reasonable reason for still having fighter ships. The reasoning is thin (the counter mass fields work better the smaller the object is), but at least I can live with it. I also enjoyed the idea that space is basically full of humans of alien origin.

Frontiers saga by Ryk Brown:

This is almost the exact same series as Odyssey one. I enjoyed the first series, but it eventually lost me about halfway through part 2 since it pretty much just felt like more of the same and events always considered to return the situation to the status quo.

Duchy of Terra by Glynn Stewart:

This is my favorite series by Stewart, followed by Starship's Mage. I only read the first three books, however. The main character changes in book 4 and I didn't p

Chaos in Arkansas! The GOP has failed to nominate a candidate and a former President has tossed his hat into the ring! Who will win?

Bill Clinton (D)-- Bill Clinton has a name that speaks for itself, especially in Arkansas. As Governor and as President, Clinton received nearly unconditional support from the state. But it isn't the nineties anymore--things have soured in Arkansas. The state has gotten exponentially redder, and Clinton's legacy has become much more complicated. Whether it is his affairs of the past, the questionable actions of the Clinton Foundation, or his ties to Jefferey Epstein, some are more hesitant to vote for him than they were back in the day.

Mike Beebe (D)-- Beebe was the Governor of Arkansas from 2007 to 2015, and a man who has been known for his bipartisan appeal. Even in his time in the Arkansas state senate, Beebe was well-known his pragmatic deal-making. Despite Clinton's entry into the race, Beebe decided to remain, citing the lack of a Republican nominee as proof that he will not operate as a spoiler candidate. Can his pragmatic, moderate appeal win him the election? That's for you to decide!

Rodger Bumpass (I)-- In a huge surprise to many in the know, voice actor Rodger Bumpass--famous for voicing "Squidward" in the cartoon show SpongeBob SquarePants-- has announced his candidacy in his home state of Arkansas. Bumpass has framed himself as the candidate of the "disaffected millennials," citing his most famous role as an example of that. He claims that he will bring change to the country if elected, though he has not been very clear about what that "change" will be. He has received criticism for being arrested for DUI back in 2016. Despite initially denying it, it was found that, according to the police, his blood alcohol levels were well over twice the legal limit at the time of his arrest. Bumpass claims this past incident has no sway over his skills as a potential legislator.

Ricky Dale Harrington Jr. (L)-- Harrington's giving it another go after a failed Senate campaign back in 2020, as the only candidate really representing the right wing of this race, some have called him the favorite, though most reserve that title for Clinton. As a Christian missionary and prison chaplain, Harrington has made great use of his perceived "upright character" as opposed to Bumpass and Clinton's chaotic pasts. Harrington's single most important issue is criminal justice reform, specifically criticizing the high incarcerated popula

Do your worst!

I'm surprised it hasn't decade.

For context I'm a Refuse Driver (Garbage man) & today I was on food waste. After I'd tipped I was checking the wagon for any defects when I spotted a lone pea balanced on the lifts.

I said "hey look, an escaPEA"

No one near me but it didn't half make me laugh for a good hour or so!

Edit: I can't believe how much this has blown up. Thank you everyone I've had a blast reading through the replies 😂

It really does, I swear!

Because she wanted to see the task manager.

I have seen on many occasions, on this and other boards, people making lists of the best SF titles. They usually tend to be very selective, because of their personal reading habits and types of SF they like. So I decided to make my own list, using as impartial selection methods as I could.

I decided to rely on Goodreads for its huge number of raters. However, you cannot simply look at the average rating, because many authors have grossly high ratings because their fans give all their titles the maximum rating. So you have to be a little more clever to get an accurate rating of a given title.

I looked at the number of times a title has been shelved as science fiction on Goodread, compared to how many ratings it got. People tend not to shelve a title unless they actually think it's good, regardless of what rating they give it. I also included the average rating as part of my formula, because this does still have some value . Because my formula relies on ratios rater than absolute numbers, it works on less well-known titles as well.

I also only included titles that have been shelved as science fiction at least 100 times, otherwise I would be faced with many thousands or tens of thousand of titles, which would be completely unworkable to process by hand.

I ended up creating two lists, one for titles with publication dates up to 2010, and the other for publication dates after 2010. The post-2010 titles had ratings that were all inflated about two points, no doubt due to recency bias. My theory is that the majority of ratings in more recent titles were given by people who were not familiar with the older SF, and hence had no external standard of reference to grade the titles. So they end up giving the title a higher rating that it deserves, compared to older but equal-quality titles. And since the number of their ratings make up the majority of the totals for recent titles, the average ratings are inflated.

I also made a general rule of only one title per series, with a very small number of exceptions, otherwise this list would be much longer. That single title is usually the first book in the series, unless a later title is both greatly superior, and does not need the first book to be read first for understanding. If you like a given book, you are of course welcome to read more titles in that series.

A combined list of 200 "must-read" titles (basically, the top 200 titles according to the formula, that are eligible under the above rule)

They’re on standbi

• If you find your book in the thread below, send the number of the book via reddit chat or via telegram .
• Almost all the books are in their latest editions and some of them are available in multiple editions too
• Books (pdf) are delivered through Google-Drive link
• You can also send requests via reddit chat or by telegram .
• Also, upvote the post if you found it useful

Please find the list below:

11201. US: A Narrative History Volume 1: To 1877, 8th Edition: James West Davidson

11202. Starting Out with Python, 5th Edition: Tony Gaddis

11203. Sanders' Paramedic Textbook Includes Navigate 2 Essentials Access, 5th Edition: Mick J. Sanders & AAOS & Kim McKenna

11204. Sanders' Paramedic Student Workbook, 5th Edition: Mick J. Sanders & American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS)

11205. Philosophical, Ideological, and Theoretical Perspectives on Education, 2nd Edition: Gerald L. Gutek

11206. Metaphysics, Meaning, and Modality: Themes from Kit Fine: Mircea Dumitru

11207. Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective, 8th Edition: Dale Schunk

11208. Investments, 9th Canadian Edition: Zvi Bodie & Alex Kane & Alan Marcus & Lorne Switzer

11209. Intelligence Analysis: A Target-Centric Approach, 6th Edition: Robert M. Clark

11210. HR3 with CourseMate, 1 term, 3rd Edition: Angelo DeNisi & Ricky Griffin

11211. Horngren's Accounting, Volume 2, 11th Canadian Edition: Tracie Miller-Nobles & Brenda Mattison & Ella Mae Matsumura

11212. Fundamentals of Business Organizations for Paralegals, 6th Edition: Deborah E. Bouchoux

11213. Financial Accounting, 15th Edition: Carl S. Warren & James M. Reeve & Jonathan Duchac

11214. Contemporary Business, 18th Edition: Louis E. Boone & David L. Kurtz & Susan Berston

11215. Auditing: Assurance and Risk, 4th Edition: W. Robert Knechel & Steven E. Salterio

11216. Beginner's Guide to SOLIDWORKS 2020, Level II: Alejandro Reyes

11217. CCNA 200-301 Official Cert Guide, Volume 1, 1st Edition: Odom Wendell

11218. CCNA 200-301 Official Cert Guide, Volume 2, 1st Edition: Odom Wendell

11219. The New One Minute Manager, 1st Edition: Ken Blanchard & Spencer Johnson

11220. Mosby's Guide to Nursing Diagnosis, 6th Edition: Gail B. Ladwig & Betty J. Ackley & Mary Beth Makic

11221. Your Research Project: Designing, Planning, and Getting Started, 4th Edit

BamBOO!

Pilot on me!!

Nothing, he was gladiator.

Dad jokes are supposed to be jokes you can tell a kid and they will understand it and find it funny.

This sub is mostly just NSFW puns now.

If it needs a NSFW tag it's not a dad joke. There should just be a NSFW puns subreddit for that.

Edit* I'm not replying any longer and turning off notifications but to all those that say "no one cares", there sure are a lot of you arguing about it. Maybe I'm wrong but you people don't need to be rude about it. If you really don't care, don't comment.

Heard they've been doing some shady business.

Hunter Biden is a total fraud with a long record of financial corruption in Ukraine, China and around the world. He used access to his Jesuit trained Roman Catholic daddy, current U.S. President Joe Biden, in order to secure millions of dollars in corrupt lobbying operations. Naturally, he is an incredibly easy target given his past, especially now with the embarrassing photos released from his laptop and Hunter's long record of drug abuse--Tucker Carlson hammers on these surface level issues of corruption almost every week on his program. Tucker will never ever take it to the Catholic question when talking about the Biden's, or any issue involving American politics for that matter. Tucker routinely calls the mass influx of immigrants over the Southern border a "invasion" without mentioning that the Catholic Church and the Jesuits in particular are the biggest sponsors of this invasion. U.S. President Joe Biden even wrote the forward to Jesuit priest Leo O'Donovan S.J.'s mass immigrant invasion tract Blessed are the Refugees : https://www.orbisbooks.com/blessed-are-the-refugees.html . This is the same Jesuit priest who gave the invocation at Biden's inauguration ceremony as U.S. President! (Jan. 20, 2021) : https://www.reddit.com/r/Jesuitworldorder/comments/p4c1ng/video_jesuit_priest_father_leo_odonovan_sj_gives/ Tucker is not an idiot, he knows he is a gatekeeper. Controlled opposition gatekeepers often tell lots of truths, the key is never revealing who are the forces behind the chaos we see in society today--or the man behind the curtain (The Pope). When one begins to analyze modern events and cross reference them with those in the past, all roads lead to Rome. Tucker knows of Dr. Anthony Fauci's overwhelming Jesuit and Vatican connections while criticizing him on his program--but he is silent on the Jesuit connections to Fauci. Tucker will call him "Saint Fauci", an obvious Catholic reference but wont go into any detail on Fauci's Jesuitical background. Examples of this are boundless, but back to the 'invasion' agenda Carlson gatekeeps for. The Jesuits mass invasion agenda has been publicly exposed by the 'right wing' press in America. Breitbart in 2019 wrote an article titled Jesuit Chief: No Country Has the Right to Turn Away Migrants : [https://www.reddit.com/r/Jesui

When I got home, they were still there.

What did 0 say to 8 ?

" Nice Belt "

So What did 3 say to 8 ?

" Hey, you two stop making out "

I won't be doing that today!

For this series, I wanted to look at and evaluate the quarterbacks that each team picked in the first round of the draft (not counting the supplemental draft). To simplify things, I am only counting quarterbacks from the common draft era. This began in 1970 when the AFL and NFL officially merged and stopped holding separate drafts. So I will only be looking at quarterbacks drafted from 1970 onwards.

I will assign one of three ratings to each quarterback: boom, bust, or meh. Before I begin, I want to make 2 things clear so people don't overreact to some of my ratings.

1. I am evaluating the value the team got out of their draft pick, not the player's career as a whole. So Steve Young would be a bust because the Buccaneers got nothing out of the pick they used on him, even though his career as a whole was definitely not a bust.

2. Since there's no "too soon to tell" rating, for recently drafted quarterbacks I will simply rate them based on what we've seen so far. So when I rate Zach Wilson a bust, it's not a prediction of how his career will turn out, it simply means he hasn't played well in the three games he's played so far.

Let's begin.

Green Bay Packers: 4

Since 1970, the Packers have selected a total of four quarterbacks in the first round.

Let's begin with Jerry Tagge, drafted 11th overall by the Pack in 1972. Tagge led Nebraska to a 13-0 season in 1971, and was the first quarterback taken in the 1972 draft. Tagge started just 12 games in 3 seasons with the Packers, throwing for just 1583 yards for 3 TDs and 17 interceptions. His poor play prompted coach Rick Devine to trade the farm for 34 year old QB John Hadl in 1974. Hadl was also a disaster, and prompted Devine to abandon to Packers to coach Notre Dame. The new coach, Bart Starr, had no attachment to Tagge and released him prior to the 1975 season. He never played in the NFL again, but did have some success in the CFL, being named a CFL All-Star in 1977. Only lasting three years with the Packers and putting up poor numbers to boot, Jerry Tagge is a bust.

The Packers would next draft a quarterback early in 1981, when they took Cal product Rich Campbell 6th overall. Campbell holds a special distinction on this list- he never started a single regular season game, which makes him unique among quarterbacks drafted in the top 30 since 1970. Every single other o

Where ever you left it 🤷‍♀️🤭

[Removed]

This morning, my 4 year old daughter.

Daughter: I'm hungry

Me: nerves building, smile widening

Me: Hi hungry, I'm dad.

She had no idea what was going on but I finally did it.

Thank you all for listening.

You take away their little brooms

It was about a weak back.

#Please Note: This post is no longer being updated. An update may be posted in 2022

Old Posts have been archived due to character limit. For interests' sake, they can be found here

###Updates since posting

• No Way Home Cast Updated
• Moon Knight Filming Status Updated
• Moon Knight Cast Updated
• I Am Groot Links and Crew Updated
• What If...? (Season 2) Crew Updated
• Echo Crew Updated
• The Marvels Cast Updated
• Hawkeye Cast Updated
• Untitled Scarlett Johansson Project added
• Blade Cast and Filming Status Updated
• Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania Filming Status Updated
• Spider-Man: Homecoming 4 Added
• Spider-Man: No Way Home Synopsis Updated
• Secret Invasion Cast Updated
• Shang-Chi Projects Added
• Untitled Shang-Chi Sequel Cast Updated
• Untitled Destin Daniel Cretton Series Updated

#Legends - 8th January 2021

###Status: Currently Streaming; Intermittent Releases

Platform: Disney+

##Synopsis

Post-Investors' Day, Marvel announced a new series focused on iconic moments and characters of the MCU, premiering before their relevant shows and movies to catch-up on the important moments.

The series began streaming on 8th January 2021, and episodes will be released indefinitely ahead of future Marvel projects.

##Episodes

• Wanda Maximoff
• Vision
• Falcon
• The Winter Soldier
• Sharon Carter
• Baron Zemo
• Loki
• The Tesseract/Space Stone
• Black Widow
• Peggy Carter
• The Avengers Initiative
• The Ravagers
• The Ten Rings
• Hawkeye (12th November)

#Assembled

###Status: Currently Streaming; Intermittent Releases

Platform: Disney+

An in-depth look at MCU movies and T.V shows, a comprehensive documentary series streaming on Disney+ that chronicles the creation of Marvel Studios' thrilling new shows and theatrical releases.

This series began streaming on 12th March 2021, a week after WandaVision's final episode was released, and episodes will be released indefinitely after select Marvel Studios properties release.

##Episodes

• The Making of WandaVision
• The Making of The Falcon and the Winter Soldier
• The Making of Loki
• The Making of Black Widow
• The Making of What If...?
• The Making of Shang-Chi and the Legend of The Ten Rings
• The Making of Hawkeye

#Hawkeye - November 24th 2021 (6 Episodes)

###Status - Wrapped; First 2 Episodes streaming on November 24th

Platform: Disney+

^(**Wo

There hasn't been a post all year!