Paedophilia Puns

OP is a poster that declares "Minor Attracted Person (MAP)" as paedophiles, and "sex with minors" as rape. Some commenters wonder if this poster is as brave as it's trying to be, others get down to business analysing the intricate issues of what constitutes a sexuality, and whether the logic of excluding the so-called MAP from the LGBTQ is faulty, even if the goal is admirable. One user invokes 2nd amendment rights. Recent protests somehow make their way into the drama. Others dismiss the whole thing as a giant 4chan meme people fall for. Few propose killing all paedophiles.

Original Post.

Comments sorted by controversial.

Some Highlights:

Okay now I might get hate for this but the act of being a pedophile simply means you love children just because you are a pedophile doesn’t mean you rape edit:I used the term love because that is the definition.

Idc. Kill them all.

I'll play doubles advocate. If we agree that ALL persons on the LGBTQ+ spectrum have 0% agency over their sexuality and it's 100% congenital, why doesn't that also apply to MAP? Why is it ok to wish death and torture upon people over a trait they claim they have 0% control over?

And this is why the 2nd amendment should be protected so we can get rid of anyone who thinks child rape is a valid sexuality Sincerely a pansexual

"paedophilia is not classified as a sexuality wheras LGBTQ is", as if that's an argument in and of itself. It's circular logic. It's like saying "This is true because we consider it to be true" as if classifying something changes the nature of reality.

[That's because you don't understand the distinction between a sexuality and a paraphelia.](https://www.reddit.com/r/TIHI/comments/rkag5h/comment/hp9g3by/?utm_sou

By classical I mean the school of Freud and Lacan rather than Jung, Adler, Horney, etc.

TW: extremely concerning numbers regarding paedophilic preferences.

There has been a lot of tiptoeing around paedophilia, hebephilia and other sexual deviances because we currently live in a world where it's trendy to be all too liberal and all too understanding.

EDIT: to add, before you dwell further- help IS available for treating paedophilic preferences. If you fear these thoughts in your head, I highly suggest you focus strictly on dealing with that through professional help. Thoughts may be crazy and scary, but they do not define you. Please, get help.

Our society is stunting it's own progress by attempting to be PC about these very real and very concerning mental health disorders. By allowing paedophiles to exist in it freely and without consequences, we're subjecting our future generations to extreme levels of abuse that will need years of therapy to resolve. We as a society simply can't afford that. These men need to intense, professional help. And yes, I say men because isolated paedophilia is a disorder found exclusively in men.

"Concerning sexual offending against children, two groups can be distinguished: first, those who show no sexual preference disorder, but whom, for various reasons, sexually abuse children. Reasons include sexually inexperienced adolescents, mentally retarded persons, and those with antisocial personality disorders (ASPDs), or perpetrators within general traumatizing family constellations, which seek surrogate partners in children (Rice and Harris, 2002; Greenberg et al., 2005). These individuals are most likely diagnosed with various impulse-control disorders, accounting for their engaging in child sexual abuse (CSA) without a specific sexual preference for prepubescent children (Allnutt et al., 1996; Greenberg et al., 2005). Second, there are those who do display a sexual preference disorder, namely pedophilia (i.e., the sexual preference for prepubescent minors) and/or hebephilia (i.e., the sexual preference for pubescent minors) (Seto et al., 1999).

Interestingly, women that have committed CSA have all been found to suffer from at least one of the following: high lifetime prevalence of neglect and

I'm as horrified as you're my honoured critic from what came out of my pen.

I look for a general critique.

I look if you find the third part well-fitting with the first and second parts.

Did the references to statistical figures made sense to you?

Any and all critiques are welcomed. But I must warn you that the story may upset you, as you may guess from the title. The graphical content is kept to a minimum. But there is an occurrence of three rude words, so minors beware!

The link to The Future of Paedophilia:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AMxLOPgHRxgj4HYUeZynzXrLQMd-Bvpu1oHRk0SAHtc/edit?usp=sharing

The link to my critiques:

https://www.reddit.com/r/DestructiveReaders/comments/qxpsah/100_capturing_beauty_drabble/ [546]

https://www.reddit.com/r/DestructiveReaders/comments/qwbckp/ethical_necromancy_and_its_benefits_for_the/ [1329]

The Left's Problem with Paedophilia

Harry takes a trip down the rabbit hole and explores the left's consistent and reoccurring attempts to destigmatise and justify paedophilia.

https://www.lotuseaters.com/video-the-lefts-problem-with-paedophilia-24-11-21

https://preview.redd.it/hk7sogp2rp181.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=2c1eb5a7cee9ab309a97e0b8084c343ed6aadc95

Analysis by Thomas

www.lotuseaters.com/intersectionalisms-mysterious-paedophilia-problem-23-11-21