Cross-reactive memory T cells associate with protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in COVID-19 contacts nature.com/articles/s4146…
πŸ‘︎ 49
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/joeco316
πŸ“…︎ Jan 10 2022
🚨︎ report
Cross-reactive memory T cells associate with protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in COVID-19 contacts - Nature Communications nature.com/articles/s4146…
πŸ‘︎ 34
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/InfiniteModel
πŸ“…︎ Jan 17 2022
🚨︎ report
DDR4 memory protections are broken wide open by new Rowhammer technique arstechnica.com/gadgets/2…
πŸ‘︎ 356
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/braincrowd
πŸ“…︎ Nov 15 2021
🚨︎ report
If you lock yourself up somewhere out of fear then lose your memory, you would do everything you can to get out, and undo every protection you have put up yourself
πŸ‘︎ 5
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/jadams2345
πŸ“…︎ Jan 29 2022
🚨︎ report
Cross-reactive memory T cells associate with protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in COVID-19 contacts nature.com/articles/s4146…
πŸ‘︎ 19
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/marcginla
πŸ“…︎ Jan 10 2022
🚨︎ report
Memory protection perks

Hey everyone do you know which abilities I should get for those jumps where the origin has you lose your memory of that world and you don’t want to deal with that?

Also does anyone know how to keep the new false memories from messing with your actual ones so you don’t get an identity crisis? (I just want instinctual know how not cramming knowledge into my brain, if I’m not careful that would probably overload my mind and kill me)

I don’t like going in blind and there’s not much point if you don’t know what you’re doing let alone happens, it’s one of the main reasons why you pick the jumps, knowing the future is the ultimate advantage to screwing over your enemies and your best insurance policy for keeping you alive or at least preventing a chain failure

πŸ‘︎ 6
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/01-hay
πŸ“…︎ Jan 23 2022
🚨︎ report
Cross-reactive memory T cells associate with protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection in COVID-19 contacts nature.com/articles/s4146…
πŸ‘︎ 37
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Sorin61
πŸ“…︎ Jan 10 2022
🚨︎ report
Newbie need help setting Physical memory protection and switch from m mode to user Mode ?

As the title says, can someone point me to some examples doing that on bare metal ?

I'm the one asking this too : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70667440/how-to-set-up-a-physical-memory-protection-in-riscv?noredirect=1#comment124926892_70667440

Thanks in advance

πŸ‘︎ 3
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/molvm
πŸ“…︎ Jan 12 2022
🚨︎ report
DDR4 memory protections are broken wide open by new Rowhammer technique arstechnica.com/gadgets/2…
πŸ‘︎ 61
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/COMPUTER1313
πŸ“…︎ Nov 15 2021
🚨︎ report
HP - DMA Protection - A Device attempted to access memory that it was not allowed to access

We recently enabled both Credential Guard and BitLocker on all our laptops (which seems to have worked fine and not caused any problems). Every once in a while (maybe once a month) somebody will see a warning appear during HP's power cycle. The subject is "DMA Protection" and the message is "A Device attempted to access memory that it was not allowed to access". There is an HP logo in the corner and the option to click OK. I think it only occurs after a BIOS/Firmware update. I thought in some cases it might be due to a USB drive being connected to the laptop but I looked around at each device and in every case there is only USB connected input devices like keyboards, mice, wireless dongles, and occassionally a docking station. Any ideas what triggers this message? (NOTE: We do not have BitLocker's DMA Protection enabeld as we know that can conflict with Credential Guard's Kernel DMA Protection). Thanks in advance!

πŸ‘︎ 3
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/jwckauman
πŸ“…︎ Jan 06 2022
🚨︎ report
Protection from good memories (splitting pt. II)

I recently wrote about my splitting part, Veronica, who I felt was getting bored. Well, I was right. Since I wrote about that I have discovered another splitting part and also witnessed Veronica's immense power within the system.

In that post there were some parts at odds with each other: Veronica's twin part (which I've discovered is named Angelica) who she's protected forever, and a young part, a little girl, who is terrified of Veronica. Last week I could feel Angelica's desire for attention so I went in and checked on her and after validating her she flooded me with a bunch of really terrible memories. She was showing them to the little girl too, to show how much Veronica had protected her from. The little girl understood and they embraced and I felt like things were at peace.

The next day I began splitting. I was shocked and upset by this so checked on the situation and discovered the whole thing had been orchestrated by Veronica to get the little girl to trust her (and thus back off) so she could do her thing. I feel both awed and sickened by this.

Anyone who's split knows that part of it is not being able to access good memories and feelings about a person. If you come out of it you usually can find them again, but sometimes you just lose access to them altogether. I imagine it works more or less like any memory repression where the function is to protect you, except in a splitting brain the good memories are what cause pain (or at least cognitive dissonance) and make it too hard to leave a situation that a part of you (like Veronica) has declared dangerous. Lack of access to these memories and feelings causes an overwhelming sense of unsafety because you suddenly only have the bad memories and feelings. It feels like they are the only thing that has ever been true and you are just finally seeing it. It is so so horrible.

So when I was checking in on parts last night, I was dismayed but not surprised to discover a memory incinerating part. A huge gorilla made of fire who burns positive memories I have of people and scares the other parts into not creating them in the first place because they will ultimately be forced to watch their destruction. I don't know how many parts blended with me at that point, but there were a lot of them and they were extremely upset. It really feels like the two splitting parts have had a prolonged and c

... keep reading on reddit ➑

πŸ‘︎ 24
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/polkadotaardvark
πŸ“…︎ Nov 28 2021
🚨︎ report
more shitposts about memory protection and food
πŸ‘︎ 14
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ Dec 01 2021
🚨︎ report
Blumentals Surfblocker protection bypass using memory loader github.com/revengsmK/cilo…
πŸ‘︎ 8
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/revengsmK
πŸ“…︎ Dec 23 2021
🚨︎ report
Trivalent nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccine yields durable memory B cell protection against genital herpes in preclinical models - Docwire News docwirenews.com/abstracts…
πŸ‘︎ 57
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Iamatruckk
πŸ“…︎ Oct 08 2021
🚨︎ report
DDR4 memory protections are broken wide open by new Rowhammer technique arstechnica.com/gadgets/2…
πŸ‘︎ 23
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/speckz
πŸ“…︎ Nov 15 2021
🚨︎ report
Encryphant is an offline password security system that saves your data on your computer. With this school project i focused on a line art symbolism logo; the shield represents the security/protection and the elephant is wellknown for it's memory. Let me know what you'll think! reddit.com/gallery/qbykpb
πŸ‘︎ 8
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Fr0kk00
πŸ“…︎ Oct 20 2021
🚨︎ report
Memory Read Protection.

Hi guys!

I am going to ship some samples of a product I work on to our competitors. The device uses a stm32 controller. Does anyone know how I can easily lock the entire flash from being accessible? Is it enough to set the readout protection (RDP) to level 1?

Are there any other things that I should think about when it comes to embedded code security?

I don't want them to read our flash and then use Ghidra and have the time of their life.

πŸ‘︎ 2
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Steve4467
πŸ“…︎ Sep 13 2021
🚨︎ report
What kind of protection do memory T cell stored in bone marrow provide, compared to neutralizing/sterilizing immunity?

There’s lots of discussion around the vaccines providing the best source of sterilizing immunity, but what protection could be provided from these memory T cells from natural infection and the following convalescent immunity? And do vaccines also provide this same type of immunity, or only sterilizing immunity?

πŸ‘︎ 9
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/GlossyEyed
πŸ“…︎ Sep 01 2021
🚨︎ report
ShellcodeFluctuation: An in-memory evasion technique fluctuating shellcode memory protection between RW & RX and encrypting/decrypting contents github.com/mgeeky/Shellco…
πŸ‘︎ 4
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/digicat
πŸ“…︎ Sep 29 2021
🚨︎ report
Reverse Engineering, Memory Hacking and Software Protection impodays.com/courses/reve…
πŸ‘︎ 3
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/TronicBoy
πŸ“…︎ Sep 29 2021
🚨︎ report
ShellcodeFluctuation: An in-memory evasion technique fluctuating shellcode memory protection between RW & RX and encrypting/decrypting contents github.com/mgeeky/Shellco…
πŸ‘︎ 3
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/netbiosX
πŸ“…︎ Sep 29 2021
🚨︎ report
1 October – Reverse Engineering, Memory Hacking and Software Protection(19$ to Free) dailycourse.top/1-october…
πŸ‘︎ 2
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/jpntr
πŸ“…︎ Sep 30 2021
🚨︎ report
1 October - Reverse Engineering, Memory Hacking and Software Protection dailycourse.top/1-october…
πŸ‘︎ 2
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/jpntr
πŸ“…︎ Sep 30 2021
🚨︎ report
Reverse Engineering, Memory Hacking and Software Protection idownloadcoupon.com/coupo…
πŸ‘︎ 2
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/smartybrome
πŸ“…︎ Sep 29 2021
🚨︎ report
[SELinux] "Memory protection checking: requested (insecure)" Why?

Hello!

I recently enabled selinux with default targeted policy on a fresh installation and when I check the status I see this:

# sestatus
SELinux status: enabled
SELinuxfs mount: /sys/fs/selinux
SELinux root directory: /etc/selinux
Loaded policy name: targeted
Current mode: enforcing
Mode from config file: enforcing
Policy MLS status: enabled
Policy deny_unknown status: allowed
Memory protection checking: requested (insecure)
Max kernel policy version: 33

However if I look at the tutorials and how-tos online (example) everything is more or less the same except the second-to-last line which is instead:

Memory protection checking: Β Β  Β actual (secure)

My question is why is it different for me? What does it mean and how do I change it?

I looked through the booleans of selinux but the only one I found relatable by name is deny_execmem which doesn't change the output above (but does crash firefox in an instant).

Any ideas or suggestions are highly appreciated! :) Thanks!

πŸ‘︎ 5
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/gebmozko
πŸ“…︎ Aug 21 2021
🚨︎ report

Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.