The Indian Sepoy, his experiences, recruitment and role in the armies of the EEIC and the Rebellion of 1857

(Taken from my answer in r/ AskHistorians)

BACKGROUND

The Armies of the English East India Company were the precursor to the British Indian Army, which was itself the precursor to the Army of Independent India. The armies of the EEIC were divided into three Presidential Armies, these were the Bengal, Madras and Bombay Presidencies. These Presidencies themselves were the result of the establishment and expansion of "factories" (which were fortified settlements within which English traders stored their goods and used them as a selling station) by the EEIC between 1612 to 1757. These were established by acquisition of firmans which means edicts or grants from local rulers such as the Mughal Emperors, Mughal Governors or Marathas. By the middle of the 18th century, three factory towns, namely Madras, Bombay and Calcutta came into prominence as they grew in size and strength.

Eventually, the EEIC, began acquiring land and power in and around these fortified settlements, via a policy of supporting competing Indian princes in their wars for acquiring power. This was the experience of the Carnatic wars. The EEIC adopted a policy of helping native Nawabs and princes acquire power and promised to keep them secure while in return the Nawabs and princes gave them trade concessions. The EEIC also waged war against other companies and by 1757, had managed to kick out most of their competition. However, the watershed moment for the EEIC would come after their victory at the Battle of Plassey which assured them territorial rights in the Bengal province of the Mughal Empire. The conflict was the result of an Imperial Mughal firman being granted to the EEIC by then Mughal Emperor Farrukhsiyar, in 1717 giving the British East India Company the right to reside and trade in the Mughal Empire. They were allowed to trade freely, except for a yearly payment of 3,000 rupees. The company was given the right to issue dastak (passes) for the movement of goods, which was misused by company officials for personal gain. The transgressions of the company brought them into conflict with the Nawabs of Bengal, and the defeat of the Nawab at Plassey allowed the British to place their own candidate on the Throne, to acquire all the land within the Maratha Ditch and 600 yards (550 m) beyond it and the zamindari of all the land between Calcutta and the sea.

RECRUITMENT

Now, we return to the Indian sepoy. The British had begun employing Indian sepoys to protect their "factories"

... keep reading on reddit ➑

πŸ‘︎ 168
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ May 07 2021
🚨︎ report
The ruins of Sikandar Bagh palace showing the skeletal remains of rebels in the foreground following the 1857 Indian Rebellion, possibly one of the first-ever photographic images of corpses, Lucknow, India, 1858 [1400x1208]
πŸ‘︎ 138
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/henchandpeng
πŸ“…︎ Dec 19 2020
🚨︎ report
On this day in 1857, the capture of Delhi was carried out by mutinying soldiers, in the First Indian War of Independence. On this occasion, I invite my comrades to read Marx and Engels's reports on the rebellion and their analyses of its fundamental characteristics in the New-York Daily Tribune. marxists.org/archive/marx…
πŸ‘︎ 56
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/the_nerd_1474
πŸ“…︎ May 11 2021
🚨︎ report
TIL in 1857 India, the British rulers panicked when they found a network of Indians passing Chapatis (fleatbread) from village to village for no reason. When rebellion broke out later that year, the 'chapati movement' was credited. Historians now say that the events were completely unrelated. smithsonianmag.com/histor…
πŸ‘︎ 223
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/AkashicRecorder
πŸ“…︎ Oct 17 2020
🚨︎ report
Mars out of limits meets Neptune in hard aspect at degrees it has never walked since 1857, the start of Indian uprising against British empire. That challenged invincibility & colonially enforced racial superiority of the British which encouraged further rebellion (Full post below) youtu.be/mPW-HC2yeZQ
πŸ‘︎ 18
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Emailabuddy
πŸ“…︎ Apr 06 2021
🚨︎ report
Indian Rebellion of 1857 reddit.com/gallery/l9kllp
πŸ‘︎ 34
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/BB8_Productions
πŸ“…︎ Jan 31 2021
🚨︎ report
Picture of the last Moghul Emperor of India, who died in exile in Burma after the Indian Rebellion of 1857
πŸ‘︎ 25
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/comtedemirabeau
πŸ“…︎ Jan 11 2021
🚨︎ report
Why didn't Britain give India it's independence after the Indian Rebellion of 1857 / sepoy rebellion? reddit.com/r/AskHistorian…
πŸ‘︎ 2
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/HistAnsweredBot
πŸ“…︎ Apr 26 2021
🚨︎ report
Indian Rebellion of 1857 reddit.com/gallery/l9kn4i
πŸ‘︎ 22
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/BB8_Productions
πŸ“…︎ Jan 31 2021
🚨︎ report
Great General : Rani-Laxmi Bai, Died in battle fighting against the British Empire at the age of 29. One of the most feared Calvary warrior in the Indian rebellion of 1857. reddit.com/gallery/iwu9op
πŸ‘︎ 93
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/amitsunkool24
πŸ“…︎ Sep 21 2020
🚨︎ report
Bahadur Shah Zafar was the last Mughal Emperor. A gentle scholar and poet, his role as the last vestige of Indian imperial splendour made him the figurehead of the Indian Rebellion of 1857. He was forced to watch his children killed by the East India Company before his exile. Death to the EIC!
πŸ‘︎ 55
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/The_Persian_Cat
πŸ“…︎ Sep 28 2020
🚨︎ report
Why didn't Britain give India it's independence after the Indian Rebellion of 1857 / sepoy rebellion?

From what I understand, Britain first went to India to monopolise the spice and tea trade; with no intention of colonising it. This was largely bolstered by the fact that Britain; as with most European powers; were mercantilist-protectionist command economies in search for wealth. Then through pure happen-stance and random chance; a favourable position presented itself to the East India Company after the battle of Plassey; they gained the right to tax the population and disperse law/justice. But if it's true that by the 1850's the world was moving into a free-trade economy; then why hold onto India? was it purely for the tax base?

πŸ‘︎ 5
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/TropicalTopicz
πŸ“…︎ Jan 05 2021
🚨︎ report
The ruins of Sikandar Bagh palace showing the skeletal remains of rebels in the foreground following the 1857 Indian Rebellion, possibly one of the first-ever photographic images of corpses, Lucknow, India, 1858 [1400x1208]
πŸ‘︎ 17
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/del_snafu
πŸ“…︎ Dec 19 2020
🚨︎ report
The ruins of Sikandar Bagh palace showing the skeletal remains of rebels in the foreground following the 1857 Indian Rebellion, possibly one of the first-ever photographic images of corpses, Lucknow, India, 1858 [1400x1208]
πŸ‘︎ 24
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/del_snafu
πŸ“…︎ Dec 19 2020
🚨︎ report
TIL that after the Indian Rebellion of 1857, British forces massacred hundreds of thousands civilians and carried out torture en masse, such as searing with hot iron, putting chillies into the private parts of men and women and forcing rebels to lick buildings freshly stained with blood of the dead. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ind…
πŸ‘︎ 108
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Housenkai
πŸ“…︎ Apr 01 2019
🚨︎ report
Ep 16 - The Indian "Sepoy" Rebellion of 1857, Ft. Steve Conti (Steve from the booth) by History Homos anchor.fm/historyhomos/ep…
πŸ‘︎ 2
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/HistoryHomos
πŸ“…︎ Sep 25 2020
🚨︎ report
The British Raj: A Captivating Guide to the British in India, Starting from the Indian Rebellion of 1857 to the Indian Independence Act of 1947 amazon.com/British-Raj-Ca…
πŸ‘︎ 4
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ Jul 12 2020
🚨︎ report
TDIH: July 27, 1857 Indian Rebellion, Siege of Arrah: sixty-eight men hold out for eight days against a force of 2,500 to 3,000 mutinying sepoys and 8,000 irregular forces. Illustration: "Defence of the Arrah House, 1857" by William Tayler.
πŸ‘︎ 9
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Paul-Belgium
πŸ“…︎ Jul 27 2020
🚨︎ report
Why did the Sikhs generally side with the British during the Indian Rebellion of 1857?

(Third time's the charm :D)

I'll admit I'm not very familiar with this region/period, but I know that the British had just finished destroying the Sikh Empire, so what was the Sikh's motivation for siding with them?

πŸ‘︎ 295
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ Oct 24 2018
🚨︎ report
The Ross Island Penal Colony: Opened for prisoners after the Indian Rebellion of 1857, most inmates had died by 1860 due to illness and torture. Inmates were later used for medical tests and for various experimental torture methods. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ros…
πŸ‘︎ 125
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/egomouse
πŸ“…︎ Nov 21 2018
🚨︎ report
TDIH: March 29, 1857, Sepoy Mangal Pandey of the 34th Regiment, Bengal Native Infantry mutinies against the East India Company's rule in India and inspires the protracted Indian Rebellion of 1857, also known as the Sepoy Mutiny. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man…
πŸ‘︎ 13
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Paul-Belgium
πŸ“…︎ Mar 29 2020
🚨︎ report
Wikipedia Page of the Day: Indian Rebellion of 1857

Indian Rebellion of 1857

The Indian Rebellion of 1857 was a major, but ultimately unsuccessful, uprising in India in 1857–58 against the rule of the British East India Company, which functioned as a sovereign power on behalf of the British Crown. The rebellion began on 10 May 1857 in the form of a mutiny of sepoys of the Company's army in the garrison town of Meerut, 40 mi (64 km) northeast of Delhi (now Old Delhi). It then erupted into other mutinies and civilian rebellions chiefly in the upper Gangetic plain and central India, though incidents of revolt also occurred farther north and east. The rebellion posed a considerable threat to British power in that region, and was contained only with the rebels' defeat in Gwalior on 20 June 1858. On 1 November 1858, the British granted amnesty to all rebels not involved in murder, though they did not declare the hostilities to have formally ended until 8 July 1859. Its name is contested, and it is variously described as the Sepoy Mutiny, the Indian Mutiny, the Great Rebellion, the Revolt of 1857, the Indian Insurrection, and the First War of Independence.

The Indian rebellion was fed by resentments born of diverse perceptions, including invasive British-style social reforms, harsh land taxes, summary treatment of some rich landowners and princes, as well as scepticism about the improvements brought about by British rule. Many Indians rose against the British; however, many also fought for the British, and the majority remained seemingly compliant to British rule. Violence, which sometimes betrayed exceptional cruelty, was inflicted on both sides, on British officers, and civilians, including women and children, by the rebels, and on the rebels, and their supporters, including sometimes entire villages, by British reprisals; the cities of Delhi and Lucknow were laid waste in the fighting and the British retaliation.

**After the outbreak of the mutiny in Meerut, the rebels quickly reached Delhi, whose 81-year-old Mughal ruler, Bahadur Shah Zafar, was declared the Emperor of Hindustan. Soon, the rebels had captured large tracts of the North-Western Provinces and Awadh (Oudh). The East India Company's response came rapidly as well. With help from reinforcements, Kanpur was retaken by mid-July 1857, and Delhi by the end of September. However, it then took the remainder of 1857 and the better part of 1858 for the rebellion to be suppressed in Jha

... keep reading on reddit ➑

πŸ‘︎ 4
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/soonwar
πŸ“…︎ May 10 2020
🚨︎ report
TIL the Indian rebellion of 1857 started because the East India Trading Company was asking its soldiers to bite the seal off their ammo cartridges, which were sealed with pork and beef animal fats (against Muslim and Hindu beliefs). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sep…
πŸ‘︎ 453
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/pattacular
πŸ“…︎ Jan 27 2014
🚨︎ report
How have historians interpreted the Indian Rebellion of 1857?

The historiography interests me in general, but I'm particularly curious about differences between the colonial era and post-independence. I imagine that given the colonialism involved, subaltern studies might also have interesting things to say.

πŸ‘︎ 18
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/freedmenspatrol
πŸ“…︎ Aug 24 2018
🚨︎ report
TIL After the Indian rebellion against British rule in 1857, Charles Dickens wrote: β€œI wish I were Commander in Chief in India… I should do my utmost to exterminate the Race upon the stain of the late cruelties rested…to blot it out of mankind and raze it off the face of the Earth.” pambazuka.net/en/category…
πŸ‘︎ 147
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Brownhops
πŸ“…︎ Dec 29 2014
🚨︎ report
TIL that the Indian Rebellion of 1857, which left 100,000 dead, was largely sparked by a rumor that new ammunition was greased with pig and beef fat, angering the Sepoy soldiers of the British East India Company en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ind…
πŸ‘︎ 50
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/sir_nigel_loring
πŸ“…︎ Jan 18 2017
🚨︎ report
Indian Rebellion of 1857. First Post, Hope its Original
πŸ‘︎ 39
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/00bearclawzz
πŸ“…︎ Apr 12 2019
🚨︎ report
Why did the Sikhs generally side with the British during the Indian Rebellion of 1857? reddit.com/r/AskHistorian…
πŸ‘︎ 10
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/ILikeMultis
πŸ“…︎ Jul 20 2018
🚨︎ report
The Last Photograph of the Last Mughal Emperor Bahadur Shah II during his Exile in Burma After the failed Indian Rebellion of 1857. Rangoon 1860 [841 x 960]
πŸ‘︎ 76
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/TheShowaDaily
πŸ“…︎ Sep 08 2017
🚨︎ report
After the Indian Rebellion of 1857 over the use of animal fat in cartridges occurred, the result was the British overall ignoring the pleas to change the cartridges.

My question is, did Indians just go back to being complacent about it? I haven’t been able to find any additional resistance to the use of animal fat in cartridges.

πŸ‘︎ 11
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/King_Louis_X
πŸ“…︎ Sep 24 2018
🚨︎ report
The battle scarred Kashmiri gate after the Siege of Delhi by the British during the Indian rebellion of 1857. Delhi, 1858 [630x527]
πŸ‘︎ 365
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/twogunsalute
πŸ“…︎ Feb 21 2015
🚨︎ report
Why did the Sikhs generally side with the British during the Indian Rebellion of 1857? reddit.com/r/AskHistorian…
πŸ‘︎ 3
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/ILikeMultisToo
πŸ“…︎ Oct 25 2018
🚨︎ report
The hanging of two participants in the Indian Rebellion, Sepoys of the 31st Native Infantry. 1857 [800x629]
πŸ‘︎ 35
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Timfromct
πŸ“…︎ Apr 12 2016
🚨︎ report
Brown Sepoys hanging two Indian participants in the Rebellion of 1857. If given a chance I bet they would do that even today. imgur.com/y5PoEFq
πŸ‘︎ 14
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/voatreddit
πŸ“…︎ Aug 08 2015
🚨︎ report
After the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857, and the subsequent shift in British-Indian relations, what happened to Indians who had already been educated, had jobs, and were considered to be β€œBritish”? Were they forced out of the workplace subtlety, actually fired, or left to their own devices?
πŸ‘︎ 6
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Le_Omlette
πŸ“…︎ Feb 10 2018
🚨︎ report
How far did the British suppression of Sati and Thugee lead to the Indian Rebellion of 1857?
πŸ‘︎ 6
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Mackteague
πŸ“…︎ Oct 22 2018
🚨︎ report
The Indian Sepoy, his experiences, recruitment and role in the armies of the EEIC and the Rebellion of 1857

BACKGROUND

The Armies of the English East India Company were the precursor to the British Indian Army, which was itself the precursor to the Army of Independent India. The armies of the EEIC were divided into three Presidential Armies, these were the Bengal, Madras and Bombay Presidencies. These Presidencies themselves were the result of the establishment and expansion of "factories" (which were fortified settlements within which English traders stored their goods and used them as a selling station) by the EEIC between 1612 to 1757. These were established by acquisition of firmans which means edicts or grants from local rulers such as the Mughal Emperors, Mughal Governors or Marathas. By the middle of the 18th century, three factory towns, namely Madras, Bombay and Calcutta came into prominence as they grew in size and strength.

Eventually, the EEIC, began acquiring land and power in and around these fortified settlements, via a policy of supporting competing Indian princes in their wars for acquiring power. This was the experience of the Carnatic wars. The EEIC adopted a policy of helping native Nawabs and princes acquire power and promised to keep them secure while in return the Nawabs and princes gave them trade concessions. The EEIC also waged war against other companies and by 1757, had managed to kick out most of their competition. However, the watershed moment for the EEIC would come after their victory at the Battle of Plassey which assured them territorial rights in the Bengal province of the Mughal Empire. The conflict was the result of an Imperial Mughal firman being granted to the EEIC by then Mughal Emperor Farrukhsiyar, in 1717 giving the British East India Company the right to reside and trade in the Mughal Empire. They were allowed to trade freely, except for a yearly payment of 3,000 rupees. The company was given the right to issue dastak (passes) for the movement of goods, which was misused by company officials for personal gain. The transgressions of the company brought them into conflict with the Nawabs of Bengal, and the defeat of the Nawab at Plassey allowed the British to place their own candidate on the Throne, to acquire all the land within the Maratha Ditch and 600 yards (550 m) beyond it and the zamindari of all the land between Calcutta and the sea.

RECRUITMENT

Now, we return to the Indian sepoy. The British had begun employing Indian sepoys to protect their "factories" as early as 1612 itself when the very first f

... keep reading on reddit ➑

πŸ‘︎ 15
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ May 22 2021
🚨︎ report
The Indian Sepoy, his experiences, recruitment and role in the armies of the EEIC and during the Rebellion of 1857

(Taken from my answer in r/ AskHistorians)

BACKGROUND

The Armies of the English East India Company were the precursor to the British Indian Army, which was itself the precursor to the Army of Independent India. The armies of the EEIC were divided into three Presidential Armies, these were the Bengal, Madras and Bombay Presidencies. These Presidencies themselves were the result of the establishment and expansion of "factories" (which were fortified settlements within which English traders stored their goods and used them as a selling station) by the EEIC between 1612 to 1757. These were established by acquisition of firmans which means edicts or grants from local rulers such as the Mughal Emperors, Mughal Governors or Marathas. By the middle of the 18th century, three factory towns, namely Madras, Bombay and Calcutta came into prominence as they grew in size and strength.

Eventually, the EEIC, began acquiring land and power in and around these fortified settlements, via a policy of supporting competing Indian princes in their wars for acquiring power. This was the experience of the Carnatic wars. The EEIC adopted a policy of helping native Nawabs and princes acquire power and promised to keep them secure while in return the Nawabs and princes gave them trade concessions. The EEIC also waged war against other companies and by 1757, had managed to kick out most of their competition. However, the watershed moment for the EEIC would come after their victory at the Battle of Plassey which assured them territorial rights in the Bengal province of the Mughal Empire. The conflict was the result of an Imperial Mughal firman being granted to the EEIC by then Mughal Emperor Farrukhsiyar, in 1717 giving the British East India Company the right to reside and trade in the Mughal Empire. They were allowed to trade freely, except for a yearly payment of 3,000 rupees. The company was given the right to issue dastak (passes) for the movement of goods, which was misused by company officials for personal gain. The transgressions of the company brought them into conflict with the Nawabs of Bengal, and the defeat of the Nawab at Plassey allowed the British to place their own candidate on the Throne, to acquire all the land within the Maratha Ditch and 600 yards (550 m) beyond it and the zamindari of all the land between Calcutta and the sea.

RECRUITMENT

Now, we return to the Indian sepoy. The British had begun employing Indian sepoys to protect their "factories"

... keep reading on reddit ➑

πŸ‘︎ 6
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ Apr 22 2021
🚨︎ report
Why did the Sikhs generally side with the British during the Indian Rebellion of 1857?

I'll admit I'm not very familiar with this region/period, but I know that the British had just finished destroying the Sikh Empire, so what was the Sikh's motivation for siding with them?

πŸ‘︎ 54
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ Jul 19 2018
🚨︎ report
Wikipedia Page of the Day: Indian Rebellion of 1857

Indian Rebellion of 1857

The Indian Rebellion of 1857 was a major, but ultimately unsuccessful, uprising in India in 1857–58 against the rule of the British East India Company, which functioned as a sovereign power on behalf of the British Crown. The rebellion began on 10 May 1857 in the form of a mutiny of sepoys of the Company's army in the garrison town of Meerut, 40 miles northeast of Delhi (now Old Delhi). It then erupted into other mutinies and civilian rebellions chiefly in the upper Gangetic plain and central India, though incidents of revolt also occurred farther north and east. The rebellion posed a considerable threat to British power in that region, and was contained only with the rebels' defeat in Gwalior on 20 June 1858. On 1 November 1858, the British granted amnesty to all rebels not involved in murder, though they did not declare the hostilities formally to have ended until 8 July 1859. The rebellion is known by many names, including the Sepoy Mutiny, the Indian Mutiny, the Great Rebellion, the Revolt of 1857, the Indian Insurrection, and the First War of Independence.

**The Indian rebellion was fed by resentments born of diverse perceptions, including invasive British-style social reforms, harsh land taxes, summary treatment of some rich landowners and princes, as well as scepticism about the improvements brought about by British rule. Many Indians rose against the British; however, very many also fought for the British, and the majority remained seemingly compliant to British rule. Violence, which sometimes betrayed exceptional cruelty, was inflicted on both sides, on British officers, and civilians, including women and children, by the rebels, and on the rebels, and their supporters, including sometimes entire villages, by British reprisals; the cities of Delhi and Lucknow were laid waste in the fighting and the British retaliation. After the outbreak of the mutiny in Meerut, the rebels very quickly reached Delhi, whose 81-year-old Mughal ruler, Bahadur Shah Zafar, they declared the Emperor of Hindustan. Soon, the rebels had also captured large tracts of the North-Western Provinces and Awadh (Oudh). The East India Company's response came rapidly as well. With help from reinforcements, Kanpur was retaken by mid-July 1857, and Delhi by the end of September. However, it then took the remainder of 1857 and the better part of 1858 for the rebellion to be suppressed in Jhans

... keep reading on reddit ➑

πŸ‘︎ 12
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/soonwar
πŸ“…︎ May 10 2019
🚨︎ report
Wikipedia Page of the Day: Indian Rebellion of 1857

Indian Rebellion of 1857

The Indian Rebellion of 1857 was a major, but ultimately unsuccessful, uprising in India in 1857–58 against the rule of the British East India Company, which functioned as a sovereign power on behalf of the British Crown. The rebellion began on 10 May 1857 in the form of a mutiny of sepoys of the Company's army in the garrison town of Meerut, 40 miles northeast of Delhi (now Old Delhi). It then erupted into other mutinies and civilian rebellions chiefly in the upper Gangetic plain and central India, though incidents of revolt also occurred farther north and east. The rebellion posed a considerable threat to British power in that region, and was contained only with the rebels' defeat in Gwalior on 20 June 1858. On 1 November 1858, the British granted amnesty to all rebels not involved in murder, though they did not declare the hostilities formally to have ended until 8 July 1859. The rebellion is known by many names, including the Sepoy Mutiny, the Indian Mutiny, the Great Rebellion, the Revolt of 1857, the Indian Insurrection, and the First War of Independence.

The Indian rebellion was fed by resentments born of diverse perceptions, including invasive British-style social reforms, harsh land taxes, summary treatment of some rich landowners and princes, as well as scepticism about the improvements brought about by British rule. Many Indians did rise against the British, however, very many also fought for the British, and the majority remained seemingly compliant to British rule. Violence, which sometimes betrayed exceptional cruelty, was inflicted on both sides, on British officers, and civilians, including women and children, by the rebels, and on the rebels, and their supporters, including sometimes entire villages, by British reprisals; the cities of Delhi and Lucknow were laid waste in the fighting and the British retaliation.

**After the outbreak of the mutiny in Meerut, the rebels very quickly reached Delhi, whose 81-year-old Mughal ruler, Bahadur Shah Zafar, they declared the Emperor of Hindustan. Soon, the rebels had also captured large tracts of the North-Western Provinces and Awadh (Oudh). The East India Company's response came rapidly as well. With help from reinforcements, Kanpur was retaken by mid-July 1857, and Delhi by the end of September. However, it then took the remainder of 1857 and the better part of 1858 for the rebellion to be suppresse

... keep reading on reddit ➑

πŸ‘︎ 6
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/soonwar
πŸ“…︎ Mar 29 2019
🚨︎ report
Why did the Sikhs generally side with the British during the Indian Rebellion of 1857? (second attempt)

I'll admit I'm not very familiar with this region/period, but I know that the British had just finished destroying the Sikh Empire, so what was the Sikh's motivation for siding with them?

πŸ‘︎ 13
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ“…︎ Aug 03 2018
🚨︎ report

Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.