inconvertibility: not capable of being exchanged for, or converted into, something else

See tree for inconvertibility: https://treegledictionary.org/define/inconvertibility

TL/DR:  The opportunity to get rich quick by buying GME was January 2020. It was very fun.

One Paragraph TL/DR: The Between January 1 and February 12, 2020, some 1,680 million shares of $GME traded. Of these, around 55 million were shorts closing their positions. There are many interesting stores to tell about the stonk—e.g., why those other 1,525 million traded—but if you’re hodling in expectation of a MOASS, you need there to be some reasonable story of why there are still significant shorts in the stock today. And there isn’t—because there aren’t.

https://preview.redd.it/l5w6wujh45681.png?width=640&format=png&auto=webp&s=651883da88d28773ad5b64decbdc2a0a27cdcb3e

Here’s a joke I like:

>Two conspiracy theorists die and are standing before the throne of God. One falls to his knees: “Lord, I’ve spent my life trying to solve the JFK assassination. I’m begging for the truth: who really killed him?” A sigh comes from On High. “The Warren Report told you. It was Lee Harvey Oswald. He acted alone.”
>
>Shaken, the man turns to his companion. “Wow. The cover-up goes EVEN HIGHER than I thought!”

Returning to Reddit after much time away (sorry! Responsibilities to people who pay me actual money), this felt apropos, because, you know, on the will-there-be-a-MOSS-in-Gamestop question, we have a final answer from the SEC.

>There was a MOASS. It happened in January. There are no secret shorts.

****

Yet, on the GME bull subs, folks seem relentlessly committed to terminal unawareness of this basic point. All the excitement about DRS-ing, the tweet of the day, unrelated financial dooming—these only matter if you have a basis for believing that there’s some massive short interest in GME right now.

And there isn’t.

And, moreover, there isn’t any evidence that there might be. (No, hearsay and conjecture aren’t evidence). To the contrary, we have a specific explanation of why there used to be shorts, there aren’t shorts now, shorts covered and closed and went away.

In brief: the SEC has told you (as I’ve previously obliquely suggested) that January 2020 was a classic retail-driven mania. People got excited about stocks, way out of proportion to valuation, and eagerness to buy drove prices way way up. And the combination of prices-going-up and markets going-irrationally-unpredi

I don't want to step on anybody's toes here, but the amount of non-dad jokes here in this subreddit really annoys me. First of all, dad jokes CAN be NSFW, it clearly says so in the sub rules. Secondly, it doesn't automatically make it a dad joke if it's from a conversation between you and your child. Most importantly, the jokes that your CHILDREN tell YOU are not dad jokes. The point of a dad joke is that it's so cheesy only a dad who's trying to be funny would make such a joke. That's it. They are stupid plays on words, lame puns and so on. There has to be a clever pun or wordplay for it to be considered a dad joke.

Again, to all the fellow dads, I apologise if I'm sounding too harsh. But I just needed to get it off my chest.

Do your worst!

I'm surprised it hasn't decade.

For context I'm a Refuse Driver (Garbage man) & today I was on food waste. After I'd tipped I was checking the wagon for any defects when I spotted a lone pea balanced on the lifts.

I said "hey look, an escaPEA"

No one near me but it didn't half make me laugh for a good hour or so!

Edit: I can't believe how much this has blown up. Thank you everyone I've had a blast reading through the replies 😂

It really does, I swear!

They’re on standbi

Pilot on me!!

Nothing, he was gladiator.

Dad jokes are supposed to be jokes you can tell a kid and they will understand it and find it funny.

This sub is mostly just NSFW puns now.

If it needs a NSFW tag it's not a dad joke. There should just be a NSFW puns subreddit for that.

Edit* I'm not replying any longer and turning off notifications but to all those that say "no one cares", there sure are a lot of you arguing about it. Maybe I'm wrong but you people don't need to be rude about it. If you really don't care, don't comment.

Series Intro: (I am getting increasingly worried about the amount of warning signals that are flashing red for hyperinflation- I believe the process has already begun, as I will lay out in this paper. The first stages of hyperinflation begin slowly, and as this is an exponential process, most people will not grasp the true extent of it until it is too late. I know I’m going to gloss over a lot of stuff going over this, sorry about this but I need to fit it all into four posts without giving everyone a 400 page treatise on macro-economics to read. Counter-DDs and opinions welcome. This is going to be a lot longer than a normal DD, but I promise the pay-off is worth it, knowing the history is key to understanding where we are today.)

This is a continuation of Part 4.0- If you haven't already, PLEASE go back and read the prior sections before continuing.

I want to caveat the below by stating that I do not think a potential hyperinflation in the U.S. would look the exact same as Weimar Germany. We have had 100 years of technological and social advancement, and thus it would manifest very differently today. The 1920’s German hyperinflation is a worst-case scenario, but it is vital to understand the history to analyze the similar situation which our nation faces.

Hyperinflation Begins

As 1921 dragged on, the fiscal situation continued to worsen. The German Government faced an impossible situation: they could either choose to hike taxes to over double their current rates (which were already high due to tax hikes authorized during wartime), which would most certainly cause a political revolution in Germany and potential default; or they could continue to print their deficits, and hope that the Allies wouldn’t seize German assets or that the rising cost of living would cause food shortages and riots. They continued down the path of money printing, unaware that they were steering their country ever more rapidly into the abyss.

In March 1921, France occupied German ports, due to increasing frustration on the side of the Allies of the Germans’ inability to pay. The Rhine ports of Duisburg, Ruhrort, and Dusseld

First of all, this is a legit question.

I know hindi lahat but why most people hold SLP? Since alam nating lahat na mas maraming namimint na SLP kesa nabuburn so mababa chance ng value nya na tumaas.

Instead, bakit hindi na lang inconvert to established coins like ADA, XRP, ETH, etc. na mas may chance na tumaas?

Medyo curious lang kasi lahat ng nakikita ko inaantay tumaas SLP since they are holding the coin.

I won't be doing that today!

inconvertibility: not capable of being exchanged for, or converted into, something else

See tree for inconvertibility: http://treegle.xyz/define/inconvertibility

When I got home, they were still there.

What did 0 say to 8 ?

" Nice Belt "

So What did 3 say to 8 ?

" Hey, you two stop making out "