As every other job. Pension is a portion of your salary and should not be able to be touched. You can demand that an officer payes for damages yes, but not take his/her pension.
The worst are the fucking SJWs that want damages done by police officers being payed by the police pension fund. Like what-the-fuck are you on about. Why punish everyone for the actions of a few. It's so fucking stupid.
They suspect the hijackers are a gang of hardened criminals.
They’re sometimes stuck between a rock and a hard place
I'm guessing quite a few here are LEO.
Are you quiet about the line of work you do or are you pretty open about it?
I train at quite a small gym, averages about 6 people a session, everyone knows each other and we're all good friends so I'm fairly open about my line of work.
One dude comes along for a session, seems quite a friendly guy until he finds out my line of work and his whole attitude towards me changes.
Next minute I'm getting dump tackled (or speared for you Americans out there) head first into the ground followed by very subtle 'shoulder strikes' to the jaw in his attempt at doing a Von Flue choke. I could tell this dude was just out to deliver pain, safe to say I got my ass kicked.
Anyone else had any experiences that made them think twice about being open with their line of work?
Think about it, they have guns, body armor, are trained to win in a combat situation, and are usually relatively young and fit men. Some of them also practice home break ins.
They have every tool, skill, and resource needed to become raiders. Although most will not raid, enough will choose to do so that they will become a terrifying force. Even the ones that possess high moral standards could eventually succumb to desperation and turn on those they swore to protect.
All the more reason to buy a firearm and practice with it.
EDIT: I am talking about a severe SHTF scenario, just clarifying.
>If you steal property, you must report its fair market value in your income in the year you steal it unless you return it to its rightful owner in the same year,"' read the provision for stolen property
What if you're dealing drugs or caught up in other crimes?
>In that case, the IRS publication says jot your earnings on line 8z, Schedule 1 of your 1040 form, "or on schedule C ... if from your self-employment activity And don't forget to report any bribes or kickbacks you took in the course of doing business.
The kickbacks also go on Schedule 1 or Schedule C, while the IRS says bribes should simply be included in your income.
At first, I thought its a joke but it's real.
Basically, IRS wouldn't share the identity of the criminal to any other law enforcement agency. In other words, as long as criminal is paying tax it's all good.The main aim is to just get more and more in tax revenue without being bothered by the crime committed.This is just extreme level of double standards,the same authorities would cry "Crypto only used by Criminals" then this tax provision.
Then why complain about Crypto being used by criminals?
Link to the article : https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2021/12/28/irs-says-stolen-property-must-reported-and-twitter-goes-wild/9035694002/
In a March 8, 2017 article by Alexis McAdams she asked some poignant questions to Doug Carter.
Indiana State Police Superintendent Dour Carter says they have several pieces and parts but that they are looking for the one piece of "evidence" that will crack the case. "I know, we have the human element and we have a very solid science element" he said. "We are using every capable process that we have from a scientific perspective as everyone would expect us to and we will continue to do that until there is nothing left to do. He is asked by the reporter, "does that include DNA?" he answers "It does". We have not ruled out that it is a local person. Every time we clear someone it gets us closer. We are confident that somewhere in the tips, we have valuable information and every time we can eliminate one, we can move on to the next.
Because of the new information we have learned over the past two weeks, we can look at these answers differently in my opinion. Notice how he says they have the human element and a very solid science element, this was only 23 days after Abby and Libby were murdered. Is he telling us here they are confident in who may have done this crime? Because he only mentions, they need one piece of evidence to crack the case. He does not say we need a suspect. We know that in 2019, he also tells us they were on to something in the very beginning, and that the killer did not think they would go back to it, but that they have. He speaks very clearly in the 2019 press conference to the killer.
So what would the solid science element that they have? I think it could be many things, but given recent events, I might say, fibers, hair possibly dog, fingerprints, and DNA.
I highly suggest everyone go back and watch the 2-22-17 press conference. There are some very telling questions that were asked by the media to Law Enforcement that day. Captain Berston with the Indiana State Police answers most with the FBI Agent in charge answers one. When you watch the press conference pay close attention to Sgt. Jerry Holeman's body language and Sean Evens during these question and answers. It is obvious that they both are uncomfortable and nervous with some of the answers that Berston is giving. I have broken down the questions and answers for you here, but it is worth watching just to see the dynamic from everyone on stage.
Question 1: Was the suspect local or just passing through?
Answer: No um yes it could be a stranger or it could be
... keep reading on reddit ➡)