Like the title says, for Black Friday this year I invested into a bmpcc4k with a couple of mft lenses from Sirui, vmount, cage, Samsung t5 ssd. Whenever Iβve shot the images have been incredible and shooting in braw, especially on a static shot (ie. Tripod ) have been amazing. I just recently took the dip into videography over the last couple of months, mostly doing free work for friends to build up a reel as well as a few passion projects like short films and spec ads. As much as I love the camera Iβm beginning to feel a little worried handling it. Although Iβve got several years editing experience I only just started my videography career so I donβt even know if my rig is well done (which may affect the following issues I have with it) - the biggest being is that with the rig, the rods, the battery mount, left side handle etc Iβm finding it really difficult to a) stabilize my shots when doing hand held stuff which I assume a lot of my future work with be and b) I often lose focus, especially with the Sirui lenses when wide open because the focusing field is so small (not sure if thereβs a more appropriate technical term so bear with me here). Iβll find myself getting perfect focus but then for example in a spec ad for a fitness thing I wanted to keep my subject in focus while I ran towards him and it just ended up looking like shit. I do have the ronin s but would hate to rely on gimbal work especially when thereβs something awesome from well taken handheld shots.
Hereβs my situation: all the items were purchased on Amazon and are returnable for a full refund until about the end of January, altogether Iβve probably spend a couple of grand easily and Iβm wondering if it may be worth returning each and every piece of equipment and go another route, but even writing that out gives me nightmares of the logistics of making all those returns. Regardless, I do in theory have a chance to change my mind here, and without any image stabilization and Auto focus I feel like I might struggle in my first year or two as a videographer.
My ultimate goal is to eventually work my way up to being a full time filmmaker and possibly cinematography, and from what I understand AF and image stabilization is less important at that level because you have far better setups where other people (ie. Focus pullers) take care of that sort of thing.
Just having a bit of a dilemma here and not sure if I should stick it out and change my methodology when shooting (or buy a lens with
... keep reading on reddit β‘My kid will be starting her freshman year when I arrive to my next duty station in the fall. So the plan should be to send a high school stabilization request to HRC to stay at my next place for four years. After talking to some senior people about this. I've heard that there is a slight chance that HRC will try to fuck me and send me to Korea that last year. High school stabilization is for the family, not the SM, from what I'm being told. I can see this happening. Just want to see if this is more/less common than Im hearing.
If there's anything that should changed based on meta level of module, cloak stabilization should be a key talking point. 15 minutes should be saved for t2 cloaks, with lower meta levels being less, and faction/storyline being 30min dread guristas/smokescreen - 2 hr concord, with officer ranging from 1 hr kaikka - 4hr estamel
Blingy ships will stay blingy, with little effect on making changes to cloaky camping.
I take a daily dose of Rexulti, but I'm considering taking it only when I feel mania coming on (with my psychs blessings of course). Anyone have any experience taking mood stabilizers/anti-psychotics on an as need basis?
We learned last year in TFATWS that during the blip, countries all around the world had opened up their borders and allowed in immigrants to fill in the job positions and houses that were abandoned by the blipped individuals.
That helped the world stay semi-stable and for the economy not to completely crash leading to mass poverty and death, which would be the more realistic scenario, as seen in today's world with the recent pandemic.
It was actually a better world, as Thanos had envisioned, since the poor, unemployed and homeless got second chances and the world's resources seem to have been shared more equally across the population.
Many people have criticized this as Marvel taking the easy way out and using the absolute best case scenario of how this situation could have developed in order to not have to exert real-world logic that would realistically create many, many socioeconomic problems in the MCU world going forward that would need to constantly be addressed.
Well, first of all, I do agree with this sentiment, but I also want to bring up 2 huge differences between the blip and the pandemic:
- The blip affected EVERYBODY. There are very low chances that a person didn't lose at least one loved one with the chances being 50-50. And it hit them HARD and UNEXPECTEDLY. COVID (as a disease, not as a pandemic) has affected a very small fraction of the world and it has affected even less of them in a very serious way. Especially when compared to something like the blip. I don't think there has been any disease or natural disaster in history that has killed 50% of the Earth's population, so this was definitely something unprecedented and would most likely result to people banding together instead of uniting.
Like I can't see 2 people caring as much about their differences in politics or personal beliefs after both having lost half of their family members for example. But if a person loses a family a member due to COVID, another person who hasn't been through that tragedy will never understand it.
- The MCU has the Avengers. We don't.
I think this is a pretty huge difference right off the bat, and the reason I made this post.
I think the Avengers are ones who took care of the chaos during the early years of the blip and helped the governments coordinate and form the plans they did in order to create the, kinda utopian, society that they ended up creating.
If it was left up to the governments alone to take control of this situation, I agree t
... keep reading on reddit β‘I was finally was able to stabilize 1900 fclk on my zen2 CPU after months of random whea 19s. I tested each individual timing change and recorded performance increase/regression to find my most optimal timings. Benchmarking and short stress tests were mainly done using occt and longer stress tests were done via tm5 extreme preset for at minimum 3 hours. I swear I had to gator wrestle this CPU to reach 1900 fclk. Any questions or recommendations?
https://preview.redd.it/nytm1vf8njc81.png?width=387&format=png&auto=webp&s=0d5b98d50b100664792698091c7580a73bd00058
https://preview.redd.it/jmfskr2vmjc81.png?width=1205&format=png&auto=webp&s=4d1ddcaf9f990aef2b455caea60ffaff38dda821
https://preview.redd.it/cus7xoixmjc81.png?width=1262&format=png&auto=webp&s=8463aece3a710bacc7daf614f3f41df05bdb4941
https://preview.redd.it/g196uq2zmjc81.png?width=704&format=png&auto=webp&s=7ec0c787580a46e0db4e72f4c2c2cbc4255544d7
I started out at 3733 straight 16's at 1.5v, working my way down pretty much in the order shown in zentimings. However, I skipped tRAS, tRC, tCWL, tRDWR, and tWRRD because they are dependent or related to other timings and saved them for last.
tRAS: tRAS = tRCD(RD) + tRTP
tRC: tRC = tRP + tRAS
The timings below are all directly related:
tCWL, tRDWR, tWRRD a low tWRRD requires a higher tRDWR, and a higher tRDWR allows for a lower tCWL.
After all my timings were done I set my clocks to 1900, but this resulted in errors in tm5, but this was easily fixed by increasing dimm voltage to 1.53v. The final tests were an hour of occt CPU test small avx and 3 hours of tm5. After normal use testing, I've yet to receive any whea 19 the past 2 weeks.
Yes, I know my trfc isn't optimal. Just haven't wanted to play around with it at the moment. Additionally isn't it extremely temperature-dependent, so cold weather is a no-go?
Also, I noticed a slight performance regression when decreasing tRAS and TRC. Will fix it later...
Voltages:
Soc: 1.125
Soc LLC: MSI level 2 no droop.
- instability resulted if soc LLC was left on auto
Vddp: 1.00
- instability resulted if lower than 1
Vddg CCD: 1.00
Vddg iod 1.05
Ram: Patriot viper steel 4400 cl19
CPU: 3700x
MB: Tomahawk x570
Side question: Should I get a bigger 120mm fan or is this 80mm fan okay for cooling my ram?
https://preview.redd.it/w4jq5m7cnjc81.png?width=2622&format=png&auto=webp&s=64125d95e0d0c5cb
... keep reading on reddit β‘Update:
Out months are slightly positive, near months are stable with good volume. Good breadth across all of '22
Trend continues today:
https://preview.redd.it/2mvvs5qd3q881.png?width=1358&format=png&auto=webp&s=9384a4fe13ab9c1573e75fec97d53f80523aa0a6
Do you all have any tips for stabilizing FNV? It's not terrible for me, but are there certain mods or other things that would make sure I don't have the freezes or corrupted saves I still sometimes get?
The only things I have are the Script Extender and the Yukichigai Unofficial Patch. I don't know how well they work either.
Hey biochem peeps,
I have been looking at the in-vitro stability of a protein in the presence of small-molecule inhibitors that I've designed. I'm doing some pretty basic studies on the melting temperature via CD spectroscopy, and I'm running into a spot where I don't know enough about these kinds of systems to come up with an Occam's razor rationale.
The issue is that I have two compounds with very closely related structures (geometric isomers of one another.) One isomer is completely inactive up to the solubility limit in a cellular activity assay (IC50 > 10 uM) and the other is active in the nanomolar range. Interesting, right?
The problem is that both compounds cause the same increase in the Tm of the target protein, about 5 deg C. And the melting curves show a two-state unfolding system with no intermediates in either case. I am struggling with the simplest explanation for that behavior. What would potentially cause this? I keep harping on allosteric binding sites, but I'm not sure how I'd test for any of that.
Thanks in advance for any advice!
I'm a complete layman in this field, but my naive impression is that MIM's stabilization mechanics are somewhat simpler than Terra's, as they don't require a separate volatility-absorbing token like Luna, and yet MIM seems to be maintaining its peg slightly tighter than UST in recent crashes. Is my impression valid? What are the advantages of Terra's mechanics over those of MIM? Thanks.
So I recently started muay thai and it's going great. It's very fun and addictive. Yet I'm in a predicament where I can't use my power leg as an option because a former knee injury in my lead leg(specifically MCL tear). When I try to throw full power into my kick off my lead leg, my body unconsciously stops itself before I can make the full pivot. It also makes it hard to throw the rear teep as well. It's interferes with my flow sparring, drilling, and pads. It feels like a shock going through the inner part of my knee on my lead leg that freezes me from doing so.
In response, I tried PT, emergency care, and my physician for help but the advice/treatment they gave me hasn't really showed any results. Currently I train with a brace to somewhat ease the pain, yet I want to get to the point where it's not needed as it reduces my mobility somewhat. And after practice I ice my knee as well in hopes that it will help long term.
I was wondering if there's anyone else who has dealt with this issue, or is currently dealing with issue that any tips and exercises to do to help reduce this problem.
Thank you in advice to anyone who replies!
I'm trying to remove sensor dust on a stabilized clip in the color page. Because the clip was stabilized the dust moves around based on the tracking data stored when stabilizing. I want to copy the stabilizing data to a power window so I can tack the dust and remove it.
I expected to be able to go to the stabilizing data in 'tracker-stabilizer', click on 'copy track data', then go to the tracker window and paste the tracking data into that window which will in turn allow my power window to track the dust but this doesn't work. Any idea how to do it?
I tried tracking the dust but its too faint to be tracked and moves out of the shot and back in.
Studio 17.4.3 build 10
)
