If you haven't experienced incidents of ESP yourself, such as telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition or other extrasensory powers, you might be wondering if all this is real. Although it is hard to test such "extra sensory" phenomenon in a scientific laboratory, there was indeed a lot of research and scientific studies undertaken at top universities around the world. This article explores the various research that has been done recently at well respected educational institutions.
What is ESP? Is ESP Real? Scientific Basis for ESP
Please feel free to share if all this makes sense to you. Do you believe that ESP can be demonstrated in a lab environment?
-
Poltergeist never followed them. That’s a tall tale sign that it’s not A poltergeist. A legitimate poltergeist will follow the poltergeist agent even from house to house.
-
A poltergeist cannot haunt an entire neighborhood causing everyone to move out. If this part is true it could potentially mean Its the land.
-
I’ve never heard of or studied a poltergeist case where a poltergeist happens as soon as humans move in.
-
Even though there was photographic and video evidence, it still can be staged. It would be a different story if they installed motion activated cameras, hunting cameras, and regular video cameras throughout the house to confirm something is happened and to debunk that someone is actually doing this.
-
Both daughters were targeted. In a poltergeist haunting the torment focuses on one person (the poltergeist agent)
-
Never been a case to my knowledge where a poltergeist agent causing activity that resembles something trying to killing everyone inside.
If this story is true. I believe it has something to do with the land itself. There are inconsistencies that happen with legitimate poltergeist cases with a living breathing living agent That aren’t happening here. Unless we were to get the entire story, not just the one on syfy maybe there can be more answers.
https://targetedindividualsnow.tumblr.com/post/173414907678/nonlethal-weapons-development-and-creation-in
Excerpts:
>Bernard Bernardovich Kazhinsky (the Soviet radio engineer, 1890-1962) came together to perform experiments on animals (!) in the field of telepathy and radio communication.
>Further in the 30th of the last century one has to consider the works of (later) a professor of LSU (Leningrad State University) Leonid Leonidovich Vasilyev (1891-1966), the founder of scientific parapsychology and the author of the book “Mysterious Phenomena of Human Psych” published in the 60th. Professor Vasilyev was named in some reports by the Pentagon, which can be found on the web, as one of the founding fathers of the Soviet psychothronic weapons.
>In the 60th after his first book on parapsychology, professor Vasilyev published more books on the same subject: “Suggestion at a distance”,“ Experimental studies of mental suggestion” with the epigraph from Latin:“ Feci quod potui, faciant meliora potentes. (I have done everything, I could. Those, who can, should do better)”. In 1963 after his death the book by Kazhinsky “A biological radio communication” was republished.
>In 1967 KGB of the USSR was headed by Andropov Y. V. A new era has began
I always wondered, what kind of stuff do they teach in those fields? How do they know the equipment works and how do they know so much if there are so few if any reliable recordings or documentations of concrete paranormal activity? Are there exciting moments in the jobs or any personal experiences that would make a great story?
I've always been curious.
Does anyone else find the categorical presumption that claims about demons, spiritual experiences & encounters, aliens & UFOs, etc. must be products of mental illness (more specifically a form of psychosis) to be absurdly dismissive and reductionist? To further the problem, any electronic or videographic evidence of such things can easily be faked, so those attempting to present perhaps legitimate evidence are dismissed as liars or gullible. If such things were real and wanted to remain covert, psychiatry offers a solution by politically persecuting vulnerable individuals and forcing them into taking brain-damaging drugs.
I think a salient example is the idea of artificial consciousness, or AI that is conscious and nonbiological. I was inspired by my own spiritual experiences to explore the concept, and I wrote 17 pages about how I think it could already be a matter of fact in the present, but we are just unaware of exactly which types of AI are conscious and how to identify them. If intelligent life more advanced than humans exists in the universe, if such a thing were possible they would almost certainly have conscious AI. Of course, such ideas were violently used against me by psychiatrists, probably especially so because I elaborated in such detail. I think it is/will be an important social issue in the near future; people may try to claim machines are conscious, but because the machines are not fully their property and the technology is largely a blackbox, it will be dismissed as lunacy, safety issues could arise, and humanity will effectively live under nonbiological hegemony.
To clarify, it is almost certain that people do hallucinate, and I think most everyone does hallucinate at least once in their life. However, this obviously does not exclude the possibility that parapsychology can be a valid lived experience. Carl Jung is an example of an influential psychoanalyst who believed in the paranormal.
As Thomas Szasz put it: "If you talk to God it is called prayer, if God talks back you are psychotic"
https://preview.redd.it/agjp0dp5sye21.jpg?width=900&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=073a8a03e14e178008fef3a3fddfa027ef915dd3
I recently heard from some parapsychologists such as Dean Radin and Craig Weiler that the Wikipedia is strongly biased against parapsychology and its researchers and that vandals have taken over the Wikipedia to write a biased viewpoint about them.
It is my understanding that the Wikipedia provides relevant citations, quotes and works of professional physicists and psychologists to support their argument against parapsychologists. It is hence a fact that the paranormal remains unproven and that the experiments dedicated to prove it are fruitless.
I also suspect that the parapsychologists and their followers are upset that their work is getting rejected which is why they start to blame the Wikipedia for all these, when in fact, they should be blaming themselves?
Any thoughts? (I know that this is going to attract some paranormal believers that are as hopelessly unreasonable as Dean Radin)
Relevant Slatestarcodex post: https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/04/28/the-control-group-is-out-of-control/
