Please comment below which one is best, and why you think that. Iβm curious. Thanks!
Has anyone put out a strategy guide for this settlement? I just started and it seems very slow to progress as houses appear to be the only source of income and paths cost money.
Thanks!
So I live in Los Angeles, and I have one cousin who is in the acting businessβ¦
He apparently is writing up a screenplay about the historical period from Emperor Aurangzebβs ascension to the throne to the Sepoy Mutinyβ¦.
He says it will include a lot of sex, political intrigue, assassinations, battles, and will catalog how the British Raj began. Basically, he called it βGame of Thrones with muskets and elephantsβ, he wants the actors to speak English so that it is more accessible to Western audiences.
I donβt really see it working for a Western audience thoughβ¦
As title says.
Basically, most in the community agree that the Mughals are a very strong tag and Rome is pretty bad and basically only formed because Rome itself is cool / as an achievement. Another common issue brought up with Rome is that Roman culture is in the lost cultures group so you loose all the other cultures in your group from before you formed Rome.
Giving Rome cultural assimilation mechanics would for the most part remedy that issue as well as make Rome more interesting and might even make players try to form it earlier on, add a couple more features to the special government type or reform they would be given, slap a mission tree on, maybe rework some of their national ideas and there you go, the Roman Empire is now more of a viable option.
Also, I'm no historian in any way, shape or form but I think it makes at least some historical sense as, at least in Italy for sure (as well as many other parts of the Empire), the Romans did assimilate / Latinise the people there at least to an extent over time and maybe you could factor in the Pax Deorum in some way but that's sort of a different thing at the same time.
Anyway, what do you think? Would this solve some of the Roman tag's problems or does it just detract from the uniqueness of the Mughals?
I have no idea if anyone's suggested this before, I came up with the idea randomly but its totally possible someone (or many someones) have suggested this before and I apologise if that is the case. Thanks once again :)
I ask because I can't seem to find any maps that show all cities and ports. Rather, they only show country ownership, and since each coastal colony is part of a different country, it shows up, but any native Indian ports are simply counted as part of the larger domain without a marker.
I've heard it's the most tedious one yet, and the main building doesn't look that great.
