Canadian Government - Care Now: An Action Plan to Improve Care for People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Fibromyalgia (FM) and Environmental Sensitivities/Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (ES/MCS).

Final Report of the Task Force on Environmental Health

December 2018

The Task Force on Environmental Health's final report, Care Now, proposes a system of care for people living with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), Fibromyalgia (FM) and Environmental Sensitivities/Multiple Chemical Sensitivity (ES/MCS), including ten recommendations to improve care, integrate care, and evaluate care.

The full report is available for download in PDF format at the link

https://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/common/ministry/publications/reports/environmental_health_2018/task_force_on_environmental_health_report_2018.pdf

Summary of Recommendations Recommendation

1 Develop a one-to-three year awareness campaign that targets the general public, health care facilities and providers and primary care settings. Recommendation 1.1 – Develop awareness materials that target the general public and specifically engage priority groups, starting with employers and landlords. Recommendation 1.2 – Create materials and tools designed to promote awareness of ME/CFS, FM and ES/MCS and explain how to accommodate patients with these chronic conditions in priority health care settings, starting with hospitals, long-term care homes and key home care providers. Recommendation 1.3 – Increase awareness of ME/CFS, FM and ES/MCS, clinical tools and information, and the need for accommodation, in all primary care settings in Ontario.

Recommendation 2 Develop and disseminate clinical tools and information that support evidence-informed treatment and management.

Recommendation 3 Establish a system to develop and support a cadre of primary health care and specialized providers skilled in managing ME/CFS, FM and ES/MCS. Recommendation 3.1 – Establish a community of practice to provide training and support the network of primary care clinics that will provide chronic disease management for people with ME/CFS, FM and ES/MCS across the province. Recommendation 3.2 – Fund a comprehensive strategy to increase the pool of skilled, specialized providers to reflect the high demand

Here is all of the sensitivity information for you friend, and welcome!!! <3 90/90 | 400 DPI | ADS - 58 | 90 | 114 | 117 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 162 | Multiplier - 0.002 | Opacity 100% | Turquoise

I am currently learning a new ADS sensitivity (60, Standard) and was wondering if using standard is something that might hold me back. I just figured I'd want the same sensitivity value across all of my sights, so I used standard instead of advanced. I really know very little about the sensitivity system etc. so any tips or corrections will be greatly appreciated.

I use 400 dpi for anybody wondering :P

Howdy folks,

&nbsp;

We mentioned in the v5.30 Patch Notes we’d made adjustments to gamepad options by tuning controller inputs and accelerations to allow for more fine tuning when aiming. Based on player feedback we went a bit too far here. We’re going to revert this change to how it functioned prior to the update. As of now, we’ve reverted what we can via hotfixes but will need to release a client update to solve for the rest. We’ll get this out to you as soon as we’re able to but don’t currently have a time frame.

&nbsp;

We also lowered the dead-zone used for aiming on Xbox One controllers, which we are leaving implemented in-game as we believe this is a healthy adjustment in the long term. In doing this we discovered and fixed a bug that slightly changed Aim Sensitivity for controllers. This means you may need to adjust your sensitivity to get that “just right” feeling back, but you’ll no longer experience the change in aim acceleration.

We thank all of you for the feedback around this, please continue to let us know your thoughts.

So I have basic electrical knowledge, and i'm very new to some of the technical details regarding audio. I have some 6 ohm 50W speakers, i'd assume and 8 ohm 50W speaker would be quieter as it has more resistance but apparently an 8 ohm speaker is more sensitive and therefore louder.

Can anyone explain why?

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&volume=112&publication_year=2002&pages=119-146&author=W.+G.+Roll&author=M.+A.+Persinger&author=D.+L.+Webster&author=S.+G.+Tiller&author=C.+M.+Cook&title=Neurobehavioral+and+neurometabolic+%28SPECT%29+correlates+of+paranormal+information%3A+involvement+of+the+right+hemisphere+and+its+sensitivity+to+weak+complex+magnetic+fields#d=gs_qabs&u=%23p%3Dr6DP7_dWDTAJ

Co-author Dr. Michael Persinger was a CIA PROJECT MK-ULTRA doctor.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TargetedEnergyWeapons/comments/lzs7bl/wiki_mind_control_cia_doctors_michael_persinger/

Hi everyone, bob here.

I posted this same data yesterday (with less detail) and have gotten a tidal wave of requests from fellow apes to repost for visibility, so here I am reposting an update to the update on FTDs because:

https://preview.redd.it/93f8misf0q981.jpg?width=622&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dc513ba7e06e516766e895303a7b9974e6b123e1

Original post (with some juicy updates) follows.

I'm bringing you another update on the FTDs and how they might play with the cycles upcoming I'm tracking.

The FTDs

C35 from options fuckery leads to ups a few days later, and we have large incoming FTD pile from abusive ETF shorting in our most recent delicious ass dip

Also in Crayon

Same basic date range. Things are stacking up.

And Crayons of a different flavor:

u/bobsmith808 ftd data projections, overlaid with u/gherkinit's futures theory & u/leenixus' SLD cycles theory.

I'm pretty jacked for January. At this point, I'll not be a broken record on what this may mean - have a look at my other DD on that subject.

1. DD Cycles
2. Intraday price suppressions/manipulation
3. Older cycles and exploration of interactions
4. All My Data (and other wrinkly ape's contributions) on the markets, GME, and popcorn, for comparison
5. Check out Gherk's DD on the futures theory here to understand

I will run a private match to mess with settings and test but am hoping for some sort of guideline or benchmark to go off of

1-Does mouse sensitivity setting in game multiply native mouse dpi? Or how does that work

If my mouse program is 800 dpi and in game mouse sensitivity is 12.0 what is my effective dpi? What DPI settings do you guys run?

2- Also i hear 0, 1.33, and 1.77 are ideal display monitor coefficients. I hear 0 is best for muscle memory

I’m interested in whatever setting helps build muscle memory the most or reduces differences across weapons

3- should i adjust my mouse x and y axis dpi separately or do that in game? Current my in game y axis is 1 more than x to help with horizontal movement. Curious if my mouse program dpi should follow suit or if the in game setting takes care of that

Any help appreciated

Sensitivity values have been changing, it isn’t 1:1 anymore and sometimes your set sensitivity will change between games, if you check your values will look the same but they will not feel the same as you play. Aim assist is also being extremely wacky, sometimes just not working, or being much weaker. This can be caused by your specific Attachments, or just randomly.
These bugs are game breaking and have been happening with slight changes to since the start di season two it feels like and it’s not getting better. For more information check these posts. Please spread this so we can get things fixed.

https://www.reddit.com/r/CoDCompetitive/comments/f5cmpx/has_sensitivity_been_broken_for_you_since_the/?utm_source=share&amp;utm_medium=ios_app&amp;utm_name=iossmf

https://www.reddit.com/r/CoDCompetitive/comments/fezucb/psa_theres_currently_a_new_bug_with_the_grips/?utm_source=share&amp;amp;amp;utm_medium=ios_app&amp;amp;amp;utm_name=iossmf

https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/announcing-microsoft-information-protection-sensitivity-labels-in-power-bi-desktop-public-preview/

As far as where to get more information, some sites I can recommend are….Ciin.org has large amount of information and resources and some of the most important medical research including a book for sale written by Dr. Robert Mayer called "Strategies for Surviving Chemical Sensitivity" that I edited. Alison Johnson’s site http://www.chemicalsensitivityfoundation.org/index.html is very good. It has a great list of info and videos and book recommendations. The site https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/ has hundreds of papers on mcs if you search mcs there. This free site contains environmental health research and news published with support from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. If you need to validate that toxic chemicals are in fragranced products, even some so-called “fragrance free” including “natural” products or essential oils, Anne Steinemann has researched and published extensively on product contents, examining what they contain and what is not on the label, https://www.drsteinemann.com/.

longer read but worthwhile insights...some identical and very applicable to cfs situations

Pamela Reed Gibson has published much compassionate factual research on the social, financial and medical impacts of chemical sensitivity. I don’t see many of her papers online free, so I will post an excerpt I wrote as a profile of one of her many research papers for Our Toxic Times. Among her many works, she has published an informational paper for sensitive people to share with their therapist.

“People who have sensitivities to chemicals in everyday environments, such as public buildings, parks and homes, describe limitations to accessing those places. In this paper, the researcher examines and describes the lack of community integration for this population. Studies using volunteer samples are highly skewed towards women who make up 70% to 80% of the subjects.

Persons with CS list many chemicals as problematic, with the most problematic being pesticides, formaldehyde, fresh paint, new carpet, diesel exhaust, perfumes and air fresheners cites as the most problematic. Other highly problematic exposures include asphalt, mothballs, nail polish, fabric softener and cigarette smoke. Life impacts include unemployment, financial devastation, social isolation, and even homelessness.

Avoidance remains the only

Hi Reddit,

My name is Mike Snyder, and I am the director of the Stanford Center for Genomics and Personalized Medicine. I recently published an article titled: Digital Health: Tracking Physiomes and Activity Using Wearable Biosensors Reveals Useful Health-Related Information in PLOS Biology. The study explored the use of wearables device to help manage health. We found that heart rate, skin temperature and blood oxygen measured by portable devices can be used to identify inflammatory disease such as colds and Lyme disease and also distinguish insulin resistance (associated with progression to Type 2 diabetes) from insulin sensitivity. Portable device also revealed reduced oxygen on airline flights is associated with fatigue.

I will be answering your questions at 1pm ET -- Ask Me Anything!

Don’t forget to follow me on Twitter @SnyderShot.

Recently got my results from both of these and it was a huge eye opener.

On the genome side of things, it turns out I have a few genetic mutations that I was not supplementing for already. There was also a very specific warning to not take excess Vitamin E because of something gene specific, which I had previously been taking in high doses. Here alone it feels like I dodged a bullet.

On the food sensitivity side of things, there were some foods that I was surprised to learn are really bad for me to consume, and which I was having all the time before. There were also a few foods that I was relieved to see don't bother me at all, and which I had always moderated in the past due to suspected issues.

Long story short, it seems like using these tools is pretty helpful and I'm really hopeful that I'll notice some physical and cognitive improvements in the coming weeks, now that I'm making the recommended changes to my diet and supplement regimen.

Anyone else have any "aha" moments after getting test results? Make any changes that really turned things around for you? Curious to know how helpful the insights from tests like like these have been for you.

It seems that the majority of malware that makes the news due to a serious cyber breach targets either Windows OS or some OT technology such as Cisco (e.g. at an industrial plant / SCADA system, like Stuxnet).

As a Linux user, I was always under the impression that this was the most secure OS because of its small footprint on the desktop (hence less incentive to target) and the fact that the OS itself is open source.

If that is indeed the case, why wouldn't your average government department / organization with some credible likelihood of being targeted by malware become a Linux shop? It would do nothing but to prevent them from being targeted by more resourced/focused attackers, but wouldn't it mitigate the risk they face due to more general malware?

Even assuming that they required some application(s) only available on Windows, wouldn't the imperative to remain safe justify even developing equivalents on Linux rather than continuing to use a riskier OS? Is this even done in practice?