Implementation maturity model assessment Puns

Soo this maybe such a basic question but apologies in advance. I've started getting interested in ML and recently got a chance to work on a side project helping a manager create a framework for assessing MLE maturity in an organisation. Some of the criteria I was told to look at was software engineering. Having read several articles on ML ops I'm finding it hard to isolate which parts of the process would be considered software engineering. Are there any articles or videos you'd recommend that could explain how software engineering ties into ML?

Hey Agilists. I am looking for recommendations of an agile maturity assessment that we could “buy” on the market and quickly apply to a large organization. Ideally an assessment that has been proven valuable in other organizations.

We want to assess around 250 teams which all have vastly different levels of agile maturity. So viability is a topic. We are actually interested in agility maturity with regards of agile principles. It’s not so important to us if a team uses a specific framework or fulfills rules that are pure output.

Anything on the market that you can recommend or you have been successfully applying? We have done our own - but with room for improvements when it comes to how meaningful the results are and how easy it is to be applied on large scale.

Would be great if I can get advice here and then test it in our environment on a smaller scale. We are curious about the insights such a test will actually generate.

i went to google to ask if hydrogen peroxide is compostable, and i mean i already figured it was perfectly fine but questioning everything helps ease my anxiety. i stumbled upon an article on the triggering effect of hydrogen peroxide on compost and i thought it was pretty interesting. does anyone know more about this subject??? is it outdated?? linky link

I'm looking for anyone that has undergone an external (to your company) assessment of your company's adoption of cloud technologies. Processes, techniques, technologies, security, things like that.

I'm interested in knowing who did the assessment and how you felt like it went (was it objective, thorough, and useful) because we're looking to get something done along those lines. Thanks for any help you could provide!

Is there a maturity assessment for a small organization (~100 employees) that is embarking on maturing it's cyber posture? that would translate into a prioritized roadmap?

Hey everyone. New to the community but have scrum leadership experience. Quick question for you all: Are there any recommendations for team health assessments? There are a handful of teams in my organization and I want to try and determine where they are in their team development and where their strengths and weaknesses lie. Are there any assessments or templates you've used to help determine the health and maturity of a team? I just want to make sure I don't end up down the old-school rabbit hole of output metrics and time utilization.

I work in a highly regulated industry and we have extensive requirements for software development and supply chain governance. Unfortunately there isn't a lot of granularity with which these rules are applied, leading to extended delivery times ever for MVP/low risk applications.

As you might imagine, switching to an agile model in sucn an environment takes time and the company is making good progress. I definitely don't want to push us backwards in that regard, so I'm looking for something that allows me to articulate some readiness/maturity levels in a way that's consistent (which i think is natural) with the agile philosophy and will still meet the obligations and expectations of an unflinching regulator.

Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Hello. I introduce an open source project, which released the checkpoint of the text-to-image generation model, DALL-E.Link: https://github.com/kakaobrain/minDALL-E

Example 1: text-to-image generation of minDALL-E

Example 2: text-to-image generation of minDALL-E

The naming of this project is "minDALL-E", which is originated from the "minGPT".minDALL-E is the transformer with 1.3B params and trained on CC-15M.In addition, larger model (4B?) will be released soon.

To the best of my knowledge, it's the first model that supports english.Check the project and enjoy to generate various images conditioned on your own texts.

Hello, trying to get a gut check on a work project.

We have a maturity model used to evaluate the strength of IT controls in different categories (e.g. source code management, security, agile processes, etc.). We're trying to find a good way to allow comparing assessments over time and determine whether the organization's maturity is improving or not. This is complicated by the fact that the model changes over time (as new tools/processes become more important, best practices change, etc.).

One of my coworkers has suggested we use z-scores to do this. I think there may be some validity in using z-scores but not the specifics of what is being recommended. Basically he's suggested we can use the for each assessment as a population (i.e. the population would include the assessment's score for source code management, security, agile processes, etc.), calculate the z-scores for each category, and then compare the z-scores from the second assessment to the first. If the z-score has gone up this would represent progress, down would be the organization has gotten worse.

This doesn't seem like a valid interpretation to me. If we had scores available for many different teams or different organizations, then I think this could work. But simply using the scores from one assessment to the next seems like it would not result in the same utility. As a simple example, if the organization improved in all categories (i.e. the mean moves up, the std dev stays the same) year over year, the z-scores could stay exactly the same, even though the organization has improved in all dimensions.

Am I missing something here or does the proposed approach seem problematic? Any recommendations on alternatives or tweaks to end up with something more useful?