I was looking at methods of propulsion in space and I was wondering if this was possible.
A $100M Fund Dedicated to Supporting Projects Building on the Crypto.org EVM Chain
Crypto.org today announced that the most requested Crypto.org chain feature - Ethereum Virtual Machine support - is launching on July 14th. EVM support allows for rapid porting of apps & smart contracts from other EVM-compatible chains like Ethereum, allowing for faster ecosystem build-out. EVM support will be implemented on the Crypto.org EVM Chain.
To further support the Crypto.org ecosystem, blockchain accelerator Particle B has announced the CRO EVM Fund. Particle B will grant up to USD $1M per project to at least 100 projects committing to building applications on Crypto.org Chain. Crypto startup founders are encouraged to apply here.
“EVM support will allow for simple porting of apps from other chains, driving exponential ecosystem growth for Crypto.org, a fully decentralized, open-source, public chain with high speed and extremely low fees” said Kris Marszalek, Co-founder and CEO of Crypto.com “We offer crypto startups three key ingredients: an easy-to-use platform to rapidly launch their projects, access to our rapidly growing, global user base of over 10 million, and up to $1M in funding per project from Particle B.”
Gary Or, founder of Particle B added: “EVM support makes it super easy to launch. Projects can count on us for much more than the initial funding. As a founder and CTO, I have a deep understanding of the ongoing support startups need. We will collaborate closely with our portfolio companies as we connect and build the Crypto.org Chain ecosystem together.”
To apply for funding, please visit here.
About Crypto.com
Founded in 2016, Crypto.com today serves over 10 million customers with the world’s fastest growing crypto app, along with the Crypto.com Visa Card — the world’s largest crypto card program — the Crypto.com Exchange and Crypto.com DeFi Wallet. Recently launched, Crypto.com NFT is the premier platform for collecting and trading NFTs, carefully curated from the worlds of art, design, entertainment and sports.
Crypto.com is built on a solid foundation of security, privacy and compliance and is the first cryptocurrency company in the world to have ISO/IEC 27701:2019, CCSS Level 3, ISO27001:2013 and PCI:DSS 3.2.1, Level
... keep reading on reddit ➡First question is in reference to man-made elements specifically super heavy ones. Why do they decay so quickly after being created?
Second question is what would happen if you collided 2 super heavy elements? (I am aware that they are not stable enough to do so rn but humor me with a “what if?”)
I remember Sean Carroll (I believe in his talk at Google) either suggesting himself or referencing someone else who had suggested that with a large enough particle accelerator one might be able to make an Everett Phone. Does anyone have specs on what counts as large enough?
At the fog gate for Claviger, can anyone help me out with getting the Particle Accelerator?
I'd like to create some GPU-Accelerated particle simulations. However, I don't know where to get started in terms of displaying my particles to a window.
To be clear: I want my GPU to do parallel computing, e.g. for all pixels on screen or to apply some math to all particles in an array.
I experimented a bit with Unity and its Compute Shaders and got it to render a Texture to a camera. However, I think using a complex 3D game engine is a bit overkill to display an array of RGBA values on a screen.
I don't really need an engine like Processing 3 (Java) where you have fancy functions to draw circles or rectangles onto the screen. That said, it would also be OK to use such an engine.
- What C# engines are there to display very basic images (basically a 2D array of rgb values)?
- What can I use as a replacement for Unity's Compute Shaders? (or can I use them outside of Unity?)
Thank you for any recommendations!
Because of COVID, the practical part of my electromagnetism exam has been replaced by some homework exercises. The first one is about a linear particle accelerator.
So on the picture we see a linear particle accelerator, with parallell electrical conductors (in grey) separated by diëlectrica (blue). Asked is to determine the electrostatic field and potential within this accelerator, and to eventually determine the energy gain of a particle at y=0. Given is that the accelerator continues indefinitely in the x direction, and that the potential increases linearly in between the corners of the conductors.
So I know that there's translation invariance in the z direction, which gives us a potential V = X(x)*Y(y). We can solve this by separation by variables in cartesian coördinates.
- One of the questions asks to determine the potential profile at the edges of the accelerator, i.e. at y = +- W/2, and to draw this. This sounds easy but I don't know how to make the linear relation in between the conductors. Any advice on what the potential profile looks like?
- Another tip is that you can separate the potential in two parts, i.e. V = f1 + f2, where f1 is a monotonically function of x, while f2 is a periodic function of x at the edges of the accelerator, so at the values y = +- W/2. Can anyone help me with the formulae for this decomposition?
Next up is to calculate the field and potential within, using this decomposition and some followup questions, but I think I can manage if I get help for these questions.
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Also microwaves, forgot about that.
the event chain popped up recently, and the the research confirmed it was possible, I just want to know if this could cause a crisis I am completely unprepared for or not, or if the event just has consequences in terms of stability
I remember Sean Carroll (I believe in his talk at Google) either suggesting himself or referencing someone else who suggested that with a large enough particle accelerator one might be able to make an Everett Phone. Does anyone have specs on what counts as large enough?
I remember Sean Carroll (I believe in his talk at Google) either suggesting himself or referencing someone else who suggested that with a large enough particle accelerator one might be able to make an Everett Phone. Does anyone have specs on what counts as large enough?
)
