"...the reason we are not seeing more jobs is largely due to the supply side, with workers unwilling to work at jobs with low pay and bad conditions. However, the prime age (ages 25 to 54) employment-to-population ratio is still 1.5 percentage points below its pre-recession peak..." cepr.net/jobs-2022-01/
πŸ‘︎ 32
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/_m3r1u5_
πŸ“…︎ Jan 08 2022
🚨︎ report
Researchers found that extending the length of unemployment insurance had no significant impact on employment. In fact, expanding the maximum benefit duration from 26 to 99 weeks increased the employment-to-population ratio by 0.18 percentage points on average. aeaweb.org/research/unemp…
πŸ‘︎ 7k
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/rustoo
πŸ“…︎ Jun 01 2021
🚨︎ report
Researchers found that extending the length of unemployment insurance had no significant impact on employment. In fact, expanding the maximum benefit duration from 26 to 99 weeks increased the employment-to-population ratio by 0.18 percentage points on average. aeaweb.org/research/unemp…
πŸ‘︎ 1k
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Sumit316
πŸ“…︎ Jun 02 2021
🚨︎ report
US jobs β€œrecovery” is shithouse, especially if you account for the scale of the monetary and fiscal stimulus and the enormous upgrades to GDP estimates. 5.9% unemployment, 58% employment to population ratio and 61.6% labour force participation not remotely good. imgur.com/a/8jJwPyi
πŸ‘︎ 8
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/atayls4
πŸ“…︎ Jul 04 2021
🚨︎ report
Researchers found that extending the length of unemployment insurance had no significant impact on employment. In fact, expanding the maximum benefit duration from 26 to 99 weeks increased the employment-to-population ratio by 0.18 percentage points on average. aeaweb.org/research/unemp…
πŸ‘︎ 6
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Scientist34again
πŸ“…︎ Jun 01 2021
🚨︎ report
Researchers found that extending the length of unemployment insurance had no significant impact on employment. In fact, expanding the maximum benefit duration from 26 to 99 weeks increased the employment-to-population ratio by 0.18 percentage points on average. aeaweb.org/research/unemp…
πŸ‘︎ 3
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/worldnewsbot
πŸ“…︎ Jun 02 2021
🚨︎ report
Nearly half the U.S. population is without a job, showing how far the labor recovery has to go: The employment-population ratio β€” the number of employed people as a percentage of the U.S. adult population β€” plunged to 52.8% in May, meaning 47.2% of Americans are jobless cnbc.com/2020/06/29/nearl…
πŸ‘︎ 75
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/DoremusJessup
πŸ“…︎ Jun 29 2020
🚨︎ report
Nearly half the U.S. population is without a job, showing how far the labor recovery has to go: The employment-population ratio β€” the number of employed people as a percentage of the U.S. adult population β€” plunged to 52.8% in May, meaning 47.2% of Americans are jobless cnbc.com/2020/06/29/nearl…
πŸ‘︎ 85
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/DoremusJessup
πŸ“…︎ Jun 29 2020
🚨︎ report
Automation has substantial negative effects on employment and wages. "One more robot per thousand workers reduces the employment-to-population ratio by 0.2 percentage points and wages by 0.42%." journals.uchicago.edu/doi…
πŸ‘︎ 19
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/smurfyjenkins
πŸ“…︎ Apr 29 2020
🚨︎ report
JPE study: Automation has substantial negative effects on employment and wages. "One more robot per thousand workers reduces the employment-to-population ratio by 0.2 percentage points and wages by 0.42%." journals.uchicago.edu/doi…
πŸ‘︎ 21
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/smurfyjenkins
πŸ“…︎ Apr 29 2020
🚨︎ report
How many jobs do robots really replace? - "From 1990 to 2007, the study shows, adding one additional robot per 1,000 workers reduced the national employment-to-population ratio by about 0.2%, with some areas of the U.S. affected far more than others." news.mit.edu/2020/how-man…
πŸ‘︎ 20
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Lightfiend
πŸ“…︎ May 04 2020
🚨︎ report
How many jobs do robots really replace? - "From 1990 to 2007, the study shows, adding one additional robot per 1,000 workers reduced the national employment-to-population ratio by about 0.2%, with some areas of the U.S. affected far more than others." news.mit.edu/2020/how-man…
πŸ‘︎ 11
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Lightfiend
πŸ“…︎ May 04 2020
🚨︎ report
The Unemployment Rate Is Meaningless. Here’s What You Should Look at Instead. [Spoiler: the prime age employment to population ratio] slate.com/business/2018/0…
πŸ‘︎ 50
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/mao_intheshower
πŸ“…︎ May 07 2018
🚨︎ report
There Are Still a Lot of Men Without Jobs - Women’s employment-population ratio in the U.S. is back to the highs of the previous expansion. Men’s isn’t. bloomberg.com/view/articl…
πŸ‘︎ 45
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/RandomCollection
πŸ“…︎ Aug 05 2018
🚨︎ report
Nearly Half of Americans Are Out of Work as Employment-Population Ratio Crashes to Lowest Level Ever breitbart.com/economy/202…
πŸ‘︎ 2
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/HowardJDuck
πŸ“…︎ May 08 2020
🚨︎ report
BLS Report: Participation rate -0.2 to 62.8, Unemployment rate -0.3 to 6.7, Employment-population ratio unchanged at 58.6 bls.gov/news.release/emps…
πŸ‘︎ 197
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/econobot
πŸ“…︎ Jan 10 2014
🚨︎ report
Employment–population ratios decreased in all 50 states and the District in 2020 bls.gov/opub/ted/2021/emp…
πŸ‘︎ 31
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/Unl0ck3r
πŸ“…︎ Mar 06 2021
🚨︎ report
Why is the Employment-Population Ratio still far from catching up to pre-2008 recession levels given the high demand for workers?

Before the 2008 recession, the employment ratio peaked at about 63.3%. It dipped all the way down to 58.2% after the recession. It has now risen back to about 60.7%, which is only half way to 63.3%.

Given the current extremely low unemployment rate, why is the employment ratio still so low? We constantly hear about how hard it has become to find workers, as evidence by the low unemployment rate. But it seems like a lot of people are unwilling to rejoin the workforce. What are some of the underlying reasons for this? Are the jobs not attractive enough? Do they require skill sets that are in shortage?

The St Louis Fed website has a nice interactive plot of the employment ratio: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/EMRATIO

πŸ‘︎ 4
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/fretit
πŸ“…︎ Apr 17 2019
🚨︎ report
US employment to population ratio [OC]
πŸ‘︎ 47
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/atorch
πŸ“…︎ Jun 29 2014
🚨︎ report
"According to our estimates, one more robot per thousand workers reduces the employment to population ratio by about 0.18-0.34 percentage points and wages by 0.25-0.5 percent." economics.mit.edu/files/1…
πŸ‘︎ 11
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/throwaway44017
πŸ“…︎ Oct 29 2017
🚨︎ report
U.S. Labor Force Participation and Employment-Population Ratios trueeconomics.blogspot.co…
πŸ‘︎ 5
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/SuddenGlass
πŸ“…︎ Sep 29 2020
🚨︎ report
The Unemployment Rate Is Meaningless. Here’s What You Should Look at Instead. [Spoiler: the prime age employment to population ratio] slate.com/business/2018/0…
πŸ‘︎ 20
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/PostNationalism
πŸ“…︎ May 07 2018
🚨︎ report
[T]he 55-plussers are the only age category in the U.S. that has seen its employment-to-population ratio rise over the past two decades. [T]he growth of the gig economy is being driven not so much by struggling millennials lining up gigs online as by 60-year-olds working as independent contractors. bloomberg.com/view/articl…
πŸ‘︎ 32
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/KAU4862
πŸ“…︎ Dec 27 2016
🚨︎ report
Employment to population ratio drops to 58.3%. data.bls.gov/timeseries/L…
πŸ‘︎ 11
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/thedecal
πŸ“…︎ Sep 07 2012
🚨︎ report
The impact of robots is distinct from the impact of imports from China and Mexico, the decline of routine jobs, offshoring, other types of IT capital, and the total capital stock. One more robot per thousand workers reduces the employment to population ratio by about 0.24%, wages by 0.38%. nber.org/papers/w23285
πŸ‘︎ 10
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/neshalchanderman
πŸ“…︎ Mar 27 2017
🚨︎ report
Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets (Acemoglu & Restrepo estimate one more robot per thousand workers reduces the employment to population ratio by about 0.18-0.34 percentage points and wages by 0.25-0.5 percent.) nber.org/papers/w23285
πŸ‘︎ 3
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/RockyMcNuts
πŸ“…︎ Mar 27 2017
🚨︎ report
The employment to population ratio is nearly meaningless themoneyillusion.com/?p=1…
πŸ‘︎ 2
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/johnleemk
πŸ“…︎ Oct 10 2012
🚨︎ report
I made a previous post about how my server was dying, decided to log in today to being the only one in SW. Alliance Faerlina is official dead with a 1.5% population ratio. A once thriving equal pop server. Thank you Faerlina for memories but Blizzard had other plans.
πŸ‘︎ 2k
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/DwasTV
πŸ“…︎ Dec 24 2021
🚨︎ report
Prime-Age Employment-to-Population Ratios of Different Countries, 2006–2014 | Graphic Economics | Publications | The Center for Economic and Policy Research cepr.net/publications/gra…
πŸ‘︎ 10
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/jimrosenz
πŸ“…︎ May 09 2015
🚨︎ report
Employment-To-Population Ratio Back To October 1983 Levels: The Only Chart That Matters zerohedge.com/article/emp…
πŸ‘︎ 8
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/maxwellhill
πŸ“…︎ Aug 06 2010
🚨︎ report
Drop in Employment-Population Ratio and Labor Force Participation Rate in 2008

Good afternoon everyone,

Why did the Employment-Population Ratio drop so extensively in 2008, and to some extent the same with the Labor Force Participation Rate?

πŸ‘︎ 2
πŸ’¬︎
πŸ‘€︎ u/firedum
πŸ“…︎ Feb 15 2020
🚨︎ report

Please note that this site uses cookies to personalise content and adverts, to provide social media features, and to analyse web traffic. Click here for more information.