Type Hierarchy Puns

So for example. There’s just lesser daemons that make up the hordes. Then Greater Daemons are obviously powerful. So I assume the actual named Greater Daemons are even stronger, maybe depending which chaos god they serve? Then daemon princes (daemon primarchs?) which are obviously way tougher. Then the top of the chain is the chaos gods themselves.

Does anyone else feel like the world views romantic love as "more" than platonic love, and sexual attraction even "more"? It drives me crazy whenever I start explaining to someone how passionately I love someone platonically and then they're like, "are you sure it's nothing more?" because I don't think romantic love is MORE than platonic love. They exist on equal terms and one isn't stronger than the other. I could love a person platonically with the same strength and passion you love someone romantically, it's just different types of attraction. It's like comparing the temperatures of tea and coffee. They could be both 100°c and people would still say that tea is clearly warmer. NO IT'S NOT, THEY'RE AT THE SAME TEMPERATURE. It obviously changes from person to person but I don't think that romantic love in general should be seen as "more" than platonic love and I hate that it is.

So I can introspect my own class hierarchy by doing something like this:

def all_subclasses(klass):
    subclasses = set()
    to_examine = [klass]
    while to_examine:
        parent = to_examine.pop()
        for child in parent.__subclasses__():
            if child not in subclasses:
                subclasses.add(child)
                to_examine.append(child)
    return subclasses

This lets me examine the hierarchy of classes I've defined, so if I have

class A(object): pass
class B(A): pass
class C(A): pass
class D(B, C): pass
class E(B): pass
class F(D, E): pass

then something like all_subclasses(A) gives me the expected result, listing F, E, D, C, B. I can also do this with many (most?) built-in types, though the results have taught me new things about the Python type system and how it's implemented. Nevertheless, all_subclasses(int) and all_subclasses(str) do what I would expect them to do.

But all_subclasses(object) throws this error:

> TypeError: descriptor '__subclasses__' of 'type' object needs an argument

Is there a way to walk through the hierarchy of all object types, seeing all descendants of object and, recursively, all of their descendants?

Hey guys, I'm currently in the process of sorting every file I've ever kept for the last 10-15 years. The main issue I find myself running into is if I want to root the structure based on file-type or file-source/purpose.

For example, let's say we have an image containing some old math class I took in college:

math-101-hw-1.png

Based on DataCurators structure, this would likely go into the images directory like so (or something similar):

images/school/college/math/101/homework/math-101-hw-1.png

Or, I could also choose to anchor the file based on source/purpose (i.e school). This would result in a file structure like so:

documents/school/college/math/101/homework/math-101-hw-1.png

The key difference between these two structures is the possibility of the latter containing multiple file types in the same directory. For example, the contents could look something like this:

documents/school/college/math/101/homework/math-101-hw-1.png
documents/school/college/math/101/lectures/math-101-lecture-1.mp4
documents/school/college/math/101/lectures/math-101-lecture-2.mp4

In contrast, using a file-type based hierarchy would look similar to:

images/school/college/math/101/homework/math-101-hw-1.png
videos/school/college/math/101/lectures/math-101-lecture-1.mp4
videos/school/college/math/101/lectures/math-101-lecture-2.mp4

In this scenario, I would generally prefer a source and purpose-based format. My reason being that if I were to want to find a file related to my schooling, then I would likely think of the class first before considering the file-type (possibly because I may not know the exact file-type). This would also result in every file related to my education being located in one directory tree which seems beneficial.

However, this idea doesn't necessarily hold true when I want to find another type of file (and presumably know the file-type). For example, I've played a lot of Rocket League over the past couple of years and have taken many screenshots to document my progress over time. In my mind, when I would think to look up a screenshot, my initial thought would be to move straight into the images directory and continue from there:

images/games/rocket-league/screenshots/2021/04/screenshot-20210421.png

This approach allows all game related screenshots to be located in the same directory tree which looks to be superior to segmenting screenshots across the heirachy:

games/video/computer/rocket-

SOLVED

Hardware

Ryzen 3600, Gigabyte B450i, Gigabyte 5500xt 8Gb, Kingstone HyperX 3200Mhz 2x16Gb, Seasonic Focus Plus 550 Gold

I just received my replacement CPU from AMD. The only component replaced is the CPU. I have never had hard restarts with previous CPU before. Now I get random restarts. I am not sure if this is RAM issue, BIOS, NordVPN, cables perhaps ?

The computer was running fine for days. now i started getting this problem. I do not think it is new CPU. Nothing is overheating.

>Error Type: Cache Hierarchy Error
>
>Processor APIC ID: 4

>The HP LaserJet Service service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 1 time(s).

>Initialization failed because the driver device could not be created. Use the string "000000000100320000000000D71000C013010000250200C000000000000000000000000000000000" to identify the interface for which initialization failed. It represents the MAC address of the failed interface or the Globally Unique Interface Identifier (GUID) if NetBT was unable to map from GUID to MAC address. If neither the MAC address nor the GUID were available, the string represents a cluster device name.
>
>Initialization failed because the driver device could not be created. Use the string "000000000100320000000000D71000C011010000250200C001000000000000000000000000000000" to identify the interface for which initialization failed. It represents the MAC address of the failed interface or the Globally Unique Interface Identifier (GUID) if NetBT was unable to map from GUID to MAC address. If neither the MAC address nor the GUID were available, the string represents a cluster device name.

I am not sure if this due to updated NordVPN. I have read somewhere that NordVPN can cause this kind of issues ?

I have the newest BIOS / Video card / Chipset drivers installed.

Another thing is my ram. For whatever reason CAS does not change with and without XMP. It stays the same. CAS18 even if XMP is turned off. I never was paying attention to this detail because i never had this problem before.

The crashes occur while browsing the internet.

SOLVED

Update 1:

adding extra PCIe cable solved Bluetooth issues but i still experience random crashes and error 18.

I read that HWinfo is causing WHEA-Logger Event ID and HWinfo is always on on my computer so I have turned it off and let see if this helps with crashes

[**Is HWiNFO causing the dreaded WHEA-Logger Event ID XX Cache Hierarchy Error

Im interested on the hierarchy of card types. This is what i have found:

Tier-1 Limit: 10,000 to 149,999 Classic Standard Personal Business

Tier-2 Limit: 50,000 to 299,999 Titanium Gold

Tier-3 Limit: 100,000 to more then 1M Platinum Signature Infinite

As an injury prone/low mileage runner I've thought about this concept a lot.

For someone training for say a 5k-half the "ideal" training week probably looks something like 4-5 easy runs, 1-2 workouts, and a long run.

But if you could only run once a week what would you do? A race effort? Long Tempo?

What about 2x/week? Long run and a workout? 3x/week? 5x/week? All easy?

Essentially, if you're experienced enough to do more than easy runs but on limited days/mileage what order would you add in different run types to get the most bang for your buck.

For context I'm 25M and have in the past gotten to ~20:00 5k shape off 20-30mpw for a couple months with lots of quality but have biomechanical issues that caused injuries regardless of if it was 20 super slow miles or mostly fast tempos. Coming back to running now post surgery (to help correct some of the issue) and still struggling to even manage 20 mpw.

Someone asked in another post what types would be the most insecure, I'm well aware every type has its own insecurities but I think some tend to feel/express them more than others, it was fun to write and I want to know if anyone shares these perceptions or not. Your own list is welcome.

Keep in mind that the list is based on my perception of stereotyped average/unhealthy types:

-------------

6 - they tend to be very conscious of their insecurities (counterphobic 6s may be the opposite but I think they are very aware of their insecurities and just refuse them)

4 - their constant negative interpretations tend to lead them towards insecurities

2 - they tend to have soft egos and they may get very insecure of what people think of them

5 - they tend to be insecure during social interactions, also their lucidity can make them very anxious/insecure about reality

1 - they tend to be the most balanced type even when they are average, their egos may be soft or strong, so I would say that some may be insecure some may not (50/50)

3 - they are deeply insecure, but their inconscious strategy tend to lead them to be oblivious about those insecurities, they may have "insecurity crisis", they often have strong "outside" egos

7 - pretty much the same as type 3 with a lesser focus on external opinion of them, they tend to run away from their inner insecurities and usually have strong egos

9 - the most oblivious type that tend to not be affected by much, even tho they don't have strong egos they are so resilient I've rarely seen them showing insecurities

8 - I may be biased as I am an 8: they always have strong egos that lead them to denial, they become oblivious of their insecurities and their fears

-------------

Of course this is just a list based on nothing but tendencies' observations and understanding of my readings, in reality insecurities may depend of many more factors than types.

The healthier the individual, the lesser the type has an impact, in the end we all reach a similar balance whatever our types.

EDIT: People's insights: 9s do feel insecurity but won't show it in order to avoid troubling others, which is an interesting possibility.

Hi there,

does anyone know if there is any addon for notetypes in hierachy? I've got too many different notes and the list is super long.

https://preview.redd.it/u3i0nx8zxhv61.png?width=1356&format=png&auto=webp&s=c2d0ef8bcf9c382e0c77eab556cca0fd38a6eb0c

Code: https://gitlab.com/atamariya/emacs/tree/dev

Command: java-type-hierarchy

Whenever I open the view hierarchy of my app to see which classes I should edit, there is no way for me to just tap in the name and go to the class that I want to edit. Is there a way to do this?

I have two structs like this:

   template<typename T>
   struct A {
        using TYPE T;
        T var;
   };

   struct B {
         A<float>a;
   };

Now I define struct B inside struct C, and I need to get A::TYPE inside C, so basically the type of A::var;

  struct C {
       //not correct - Any alternative way to do this?
       using TYPE = typename B::v::TYPE;
       B b;
  };

I could do it one of the ways below, but this would add too much clutter in my use case and I would like to avoid it if possible.

struct B {
    using TYPE float;
    A<float>a;
};

template<typename T=float>
struct B {
    using TYPE T;
    A<T>a;
};

Could I instead define the type correctly inside struct C with B as is, which I tried to do as using TYPE = typename B::v::TYPE;.

What is your friend circle like...are you the leader amongst your friends...what is you dynamic amongst your friends if that makes sense(like what role you play)....this question is also open to people who’s friend group consist of a ENTP.

A great MBTI-based society would have a hierarchical structure as well, yes. I'm suggesting that everybody take a four-question test at two years old and this defines their role in society for the rest of their lives. The NT will obviously be the greatest. Sensors will be subjected to slavery under their superior intellect and anyone who protests will be exiled. If they suspect they are mistyped they will be given the test again but if they are indeed typed correctly they will be executed. Any suggestions?