Currently studying and it specifies that unlawful damage to property or anything inside isn’t considered under Section 9 (1)(B).
From what I’ve read is that Section 9(1)(A) mostly covers intention where as S 9(1)(B) covers the act of the crime itself. So would you end up using both Sections when there is damage to property as shown in S9(1)(A) even after they committed the crime of burglary which comes under S9(1)(B)?
If I’m misunderstanding it a little please feel free to enlighten me as I need all the help I can get😉
Does a drug have to be a licensed medication in the UK to be classed as a "medical product" rather than NPS?
For example Phenibut is a prescription medicine in some countries but not the UK so last year I heard some people had it seized by customs under Psychoactive Substances Act.
Drugs like Modafinil are unscheduled but POM (prescription only medicine) so it can be imported without issue. I had a package opened and resealed by customs with no issue here.
The law seems incredibly vague and confusing now with the 2016 act.
Longtime player (2012-current)/ Baby-DM (about 3 small oneshots)
I'm about to start my own D&D campaign using the Tal'Dorei setting as a guide, where the campaign takes place a few centuries past the time period of VM & the M9, set a ywar or two after the death Tal'Dorei's first Sovereign, Zan Tal'Dorei.
Most of the players (very good friends, with whom trust and cameraderie is very strong together) have characters from the continent, while one PC I wish to talk about, decided they wanted to play a human Echo-fighter whom deserted from the the Krynn military under the tense of "I'm not sticking around in a human minority" and promptly went AWOL into Tal'Dorei for a new life. (Which is all and fine by me; I want my players to play what they want.)
After some thinking I realised this takes place during a time where the Dynasty hasn't explicitly revealed themselves to the wider-world, and Dunamancy is extremely closeguarded to the point of psudo-myth. And according to EK Player, their character would never be returning because they stole secret written knowledge of the Echo-knights to keep learning their practice, and figured they might be innhuge trouble if discovered.
I've been looking in the EGtW, and noticed that under Krynn law, punishment for treason is straight up death-penalty/execution. Would the theft of knowledge of EK's count as treason under Krynn law, if not, would desertion count? I'm not planning on the Krynn trying to hunt him down, especially if they're on a seperate continent altogether.
Edit #1: I feel like I should preface in addition that EK character would have been a fresh, newly joined recruit at best within the Krynn military.
Introduced: Sponsor: Sen. Jon Ossoff [D-GA]
This bill was referred to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary which will consider it before sending it to the Senate floor for consideration.
Sen. Jon Ossoff [D-GA] is a member of the committee.
they are so going to be surprised
The Gun Control Act of 1968 was amended in 1993 by the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act which introduced a background check requirement of prospective gun purchasers by licensed sellers, and created a list of categories of individuals to whom the sale of firearms is prohibited:[13]
>It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that such person—
(1) is under indictment for, or has been convicted in any court of, a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
(2) is a fugitive from justice;
(3) is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));
(4) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or has been committed to any mental institution;
The song details the story of a Cadillac assembly line worker who, fed up with seeing Cadillacs every day knowing he'll never have one of his own, elects to get one outside the law. His plan is to, over the course of two decades, steal one car part every day to ultimately assemble an entire vehicle. He'll get it one piece at a time, and it won't cost him a dime.
So-as far as the law is concerned, were Cash arrested after his scheme came to fruition, would he have committed a single act of stealing a vehicle or many thousands of acts of stealing individual pieces? Would he be judged based on the whole of his crime, or the literal sum of its parts?
