https://preview.redd.it/rbnqhiey71881.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dacfa48129a5d37b6642bf81eae078f2cb345b96
https://preview.redd.it/2qj4qjaz71881.jpg?width=600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f4f2f861fdd2c3487c9dc923a4791cc332592e29
He won 65 battles more than Napoleon, Julius Caesar and Alexander The Great.
He is the greatest and terriful General of all time.
I think he should be selected to be candidate of Ragnarok.
I want to see him show Mongol's Horse Archer style.
I am Jeff Hawkins, scientist and co-founder at Numenta, an independent research company focused on neocortical theory. I'm here with Subutai Ahmad, VP of Research at Numenta, as well as our Open Source Community Manager, Matt Taylor. We are on a mission to figure out how the brain works and enable machine intelligence technology based on brain principles. We've made significant progress in understanding the brain, and we believe our research offers opportunities to advance the state of AI and machine learning.
Despite the fact that scientists have amassed an enormous amount of detailed factual knowledge about the brain, how it works is still a profound mystery. We recently published a paper titled A Framework for Intelligence and Cortical Function Based on Grid Cells in the Neocortex that lays out a theoretical framework for understanding what the neocortex does and how it does it. It is commonly believed that the brain recognizes objects by extracting sensory features in a series of processing steps, which is also how today's deep learning networks work. Our new theory suggests that instead of learning one big model of the world, the neocortex learns thousands of models that operate in parallel. We call this the Thousand Brains Theory of Intelligence.
The Thousand Brains Theory is rich with novel ideas and concepts that can be applied to practical machine learning systems and provides a roadmap for building intelligent systems inspired by the brain. See our links below to resources where you can learn more.
We're excited to talk with you about our work! Ask us anything about our theory, its impact on AI and machine learning, and more.
Resources
- A Framework for Intelligence and Cortical Function Based on Grid Cells in the Neocortex
- Companion paper that describes the theory in non-scientific terms: Companion to A Framework for Intelligence and Cortical Function
- A paper that shows how sparse representations can be more robust to noise and interference than standard deep learning systems: [How Can We Be So Dense? The Benefits of Using Highly Sparse Representations](https
Hi at the end of the famed Mongol (or Uriankhai for the pedantic ones here ;) General there is a claim that does not have a citation and conflicts which what I have heard in other (equally unreliable) sources
The claim(s):
>After subduing a Cuman revolt in what is now Russia, Subutai turned towards Mongolia. Subutai insisted that Batu attend the kurultai to elect the successor of Ogedei in Mongolian heartland. Batu declined to come and Gรผyรผk was elected after three years, with Subutai's support. Gรผyรผk had no love for Batu and wanted the best of the Mongol generals unavailable to Batu if the feud between them came to open war. The new Khagan placed Subutai in charge at the age of 71 of the campaign against the Song dynasty for 1246โ1247. The Papal envoy Plano Carpini saw him when he was in Karakorum, Mongolia. He said Subutai was well respected among the Mongols and called Knight/Valiant/Hero (translation of Baghatur). Subutai returned to Mongolia from the Song campaign in 1248 and spent the rest of his life at his home in the vicinity of the Tuul River (near modern Ulaanbaatar), dying there at the age of 72.
Can anyone link me to or recommend me a good source for the claims in bold? Also what besides "the secret history of the Mongols" is a good source to learn more about them, especially about the four dogs of war and the later days of the Khanates?
Rules: Subutai starts with 1 half-strength tumen consisting of 5,000 Mongol Horsemen. If he loses a round he can come back with another army twice the size. He can do this a total of 5 times, for a maximum army size of 160,000. For reference this is larger than the largest pure Mongol force the empire ever fielded (about 10 tumens, for invading Khwarezmian Persia), and quite a bit smaller than their largest mixed force they ever assembled (90 tumens, presumably not full strength, for invading Song China). He also gets an appropriate sized cohort of Chinese siege engineers and all their gear, and auxilliary/support troops, particularly the excellent Mongol reconnaissance units. They have 3 spare horses per Mongol.
Now I'm going to trust people to be familiar with the GoT TV universe, but since Mongol history is less well known and I don't want to have to argue in the comments with people saying "mOnGoLs aRe jUsT DoThRaKi CaN'T SiEgE Or cOuNtEr aRmOr LuL" let me just drop some facts and feats so you know what Planetos is dealing with here.
Mongol horse archers, loadouts from here: 60+% of the Mongol force. Typically mounted on a Mongolian steppe horse, lightly armored with a heavy cloth deel (robe), maybe leather, and possibly a silk undershirt (which allows arrows to be easily removed). Standard loadout is two bows (a lighter cavalry and heavier infantry bow), javelins, some sort of light melee weapon, a lasso for unhorsing opponents and wrangling animals, and 3 quivers containing about 20 arrows each. The Mongol composite bow is harder to maintain (especially when wet) and make than an English longbow, but much more powerful and longer ranged. Skilled Mongol marksmen are recorded hitting man-sized targets from distances of over 500 m The draw weight of a medieval Mongol bow is estimated to be anywhere from 100 lbs to a terrifying 166 lbs. A draw weight of 100 lbs is enough to kill an elk or black bear from almost 120 m. A draw weight of 160 lbs can kill a grizzly bear or elephant at 500 m.
Mongol heavy cavalry: As much as 40% of the Mongol force. Horses and men in lamellar armor plus silk undershirt. Most resilient non-plate armor available, especially against arrow fire, and lightweight. Does not offer full body coverage
... keep reading on reddit โก100,000 men each
No technological advantage
Standard gear
3 days prep
As someone who is interested in history, I've been reading about into history and I am fascinated by some of the past generals who commanded armies, in particular with the three generals mentioned in the title above.
Anyways, I wanted opinions, because I know you fellow historians must know more on the subject.
Between these three generals, who was the best strategist when it came to battle tactics?
Who would you bet your money if these three went head to head, 10,000 men each?
What qualities did you see in these individual leaders that gave them an edge and allowed them to be so successful?
Looking to add Th12s and 13s for CwL. Iโm not gonna spam an advertisement. Click the link and see if you are interested. Mention Reddit in join request.
Subutai'sDevils https://link.clashofclans.com/en?action=OpenClanProfile&tag=PYY2U20R
Are there many men named after the men of the mongol empire (Temujin, Genghis, Ogodeii, ect) or are those names reserved for the legends?
Subutai was a Mongolian general and the primary military strategist of Genghis Khan and รgedei Khan. He directed more than 20 campaigns and won 65 pitched battles, during which he conquered or overran more territory than any other commander in history as part of the expansion of the Mongol Empire. He often gained victory by means of imaginative and sophisticated strategies and routinely coordinated movements of armies that operated hundreds of kilometers apart from each other. Subutai is well known for the geographical diversity and success of his expeditions, which took him from central Asia to the Russian steppe and into Europe.
https://preview.redd.it/838nc5z7p8y51.jpg?width=450&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4c9c09885e89adfdcdee0959e1cfe96aca1ec9e3
For Further Reading
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subutai
Video About: Subutai
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS9MgymLtxQ
